Regardless Digital trends is getting a bit too excited.Even by M3 a Max Quadro type chip in a laptop is unlikely. As efficient and small as N3 is, that’s asking a bit much. What is possible however is that the M3 Max itself will be 4 smaller interconnected dies.
N3 might let Apple collapse the "dual" into a single larger die. Then two of those would be "40 core worth". But yeah that still won't shrink something with a > 300W power budget down to something < 200W.
M1 has four targeted die configurations. Jade , Jade-chop , Jade2c , and Jade4c .
if M3 is down to three , then they may be looking at a different way to organize combos or collapse those last two into one.
The nice thing about doing it this way is that silicon fabrication is extremely expensive and slated to get worse. Producing smaller dies that can then be stitched together is often more economical than producing one massive die where if there’s a significant enough problem you have to throw the whole thing away.
the trade-off is that the chiplet/tile thing tends to consume more power than a monolithic. If first priority for Apple is chasing Perf/Watt they will mostly be looking for monolithic solutions where they can. And relatively expensive bleeding edge dense packaging where they had to go to tiles ( e.g., 2.5D-3D stacked on a custom interconnect tile with as smaller as possible microbumps. )
Also it gives the option for more variants of a single chip as you have the option to mix and match pieces like legos depending on the design. The downside is that on die is always the fastest most energy efficient way to communicate data. New packaging technology with new interconnects try to solve this problem and close the gap so it’s good enough that you don’t care anymore.
Good enough so that some vendors don't care anymore. I wouldn't be on Apple getting to point that they don't care. Folks in larger server product space don't care.
I suspect Intel cares too, but they are so far behind that is a deemed a secondary problem. They really don't have a choice to build at least some elsewhere due to capacity constraints.