M3 was never a consideration for me due to price and the 8GB ram base, however after the event the ~$1,400 14" M1 refurb Pros went out of stock ASAP. I have a $1,599 14" M2 Pro base model on the way because I didn't want to wait for M1 Pro stock
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
M3 Pro Chip Barely Faster Than M2 Pro in Unverified Benchmark Result
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Lmao that’s what people said about intel and the whole point of Apple making their own processors is to have better improvements.
This is called price gouging and it is cancer that eats through the AAPL product line. Instead of providing consumers with the best experience possible, AAPL will wring every dollar from those that don't want 2010s style configs.
I guess with this argument you could also question whether a yearly refresh is really necessary or required (other than it being a total money grab by Apple) …..and perhaps a refresh every other year with significant improvements make more sense.
This would mean more R&D time which may lead to better and more thought through innovative ideas.
Love these predictions from Mayan calendar.
I would be fine with a discounted M2 Pro 16”, but I need to order a customized keyboard (most of my writing is in Spanish) so I’m going with a M3 Pro 16” 18gb/1tb which is more than enough power for my needs, and if it’s more efficient than M2Pro then all the better. I’d be fine with a base M3 chip, but I want the big XDR display and the awesome speakers so… no regrets on my order. But yes, if I didn’t need a customized keyboard, I’d probably go with a discounted M2 Pro.
Well I’m glad they are focusing more on the high end than the Pro SoC. As someone that has both M1 and M2 Ultras, Apple needs to improve their top of the line chips. If M3 Max is the same as an M2 Ultra, that would mean the M3 Ultra would be equivalent to two M2 Ultras. I’m looking forward to it. And it will be nice in the Mac Pro as now the Mac Pro is useless.
Did you watch the presentation? Every slide they compared it to M2.
It's all relative. Relative to the base level/Pro chips? Maybe. Relative to an Intel laptop? No, not even close. Relative to an Intel + GPU laptop? Hahaha.
Because Apple’s top of the line is a complete joke. They made the Mac Pro ridiculous. And this is someone with M1 and M2 Ultras. They need something more at the high end.
So when somebody is complaining how unpractical dongles are you suggest starting to carry a cable that is many meters long?
Edit: Didn't quote the right post. Meant to quote the longevity and how most won’t upgrade frequently post.
Completely. I’m gonna give my 7.5 year old MBP to my kid and I expect it to be used for the next 3 odd years. I’m extremely careful with my stuff and my 2015 looks like it just left the store (not exaggerating, can provide photos) thanks to the laptop being in a stand or on my lap or in a sleeve. My kid is more careful than I am. The longevity and the hassle free experience, anecdotal as it is, had me ordering a Max and moving the entire family to the Apple ecosystem. And I’m a Linux/Windows dev/gamer.
Completely. I’m gonna give my 7.5 year old MBP to my kid and I expect it to be used for the next 3 odd years. I’m extremely careful with my stuff and my 2015 looks like it just left the store (not exaggerating, can provide photos) thanks to the laptop being in a stand or on my lap or in a sleeve. My kid is more careful than I am. The longevity and the hassle free experience, anecdotal as it is, had me ordering a Max and moving the entire family to the Apple ecosystem. And I’m a Linux/Windows dev/gamer.
Last edited:
Hardware raytracing and mesh shading. That's the big differentiator.
If you think you'd need those (Most likely because you're a 3D artist) then these features will probably be a must-buy once the software supports them, which should be fairly quick if Apple is providing sufficient developer support.
If you don't think you'll need those features then there's not really much reason to upgrade from previous Apple Silicon machines (though the Intel machines are definitely looking very long in the tooth at this point)
M2 pros seem like they were meant to release last fall but were delayed to earlier this year
Apple is just getting back to their annual release cycle
I don’t know why this comparison matters given most people interested in M3 series should not be coming from M2
Hopefully battery life is somewhat better but doesn’t seem to be. Looks like the efficiency cores are really where the improvements came from
It’s decent from M1 and very much improved from intel chips from a few years ago
Base M3 and M3 Max are decent upgrades from the M2 counterparts, it’s the M3 Pro which is flat
Apple is just getting back to their annual release cycle
I don’t know why this comparison matters given most people interested in M3 series should not be coming from M2
Hopefully battery life is somewhat better but doesn’t seem to be. Looks like the efficiency cores are really where the improvements came from
It’s decent from M1 and very much improved from intel chips from a few years ago
Base M3 and M3 Max are decent upgrades from the M2 counterparts, it’s the M3 Pro which is flat
Forgetting dongles doesn't make them unpractical. Wire is bigger, seems easier to NOT forget.
This article is actually good at detecting people who never read past the headline.
Fair enough; although I think most buyers just see “f aster, longer battery life” and don’t care about the details of teh specifications or how Apple gopt there.
Still matters in Illustrator. That app is still single core, partly because bezier transformations can't be spread out across multiple cores, or so I recall. it's just one math problem or something... can't break it up. Hence why even now, it's far from impossible to make that program stall out. A lot of designers are in Illustrator 90% of their day, so this metric really does matter to them.