Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,686
38,134


The new Mac Studio with the M4 Max and M3 Ultra chip launches tomorrow. Ahead of time, the first reviews of the device have been shared by select publications and YouTube channels.

Mac-Studio-Desk.jpg

This is the first Mac Studio refresh since the desktop computer was updated with M2 Max and M2 Ultra chip options in June 2023. The overall design of the machine has not changed. The front of the computer has two Thunderbolt 5 or USB-C ports depending on the configuration, and an SD card slot, while the rear side has four Thunderbolt 5 ports, an HDMI port, a 10-Gigabit Ethernet port, two USB-A ports, a headphone jack, a power cord connector, and a power button.

With the M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips, the Mac Studio catches up to other newer Macs by gaining hardware-accelerated ray tracing for the first time. It can also now be configured with up to 16TB of SSD storage, up from the previous model's 8TB maximum.

Highlights

M4 Max Chip

With Apple's latest chip technology, the M4 Max Mac Studio mode outpaces the M3 Ultra in single-core performance, despite being considerably cheaper. The Verge's Chris Welch:

It's important to note that there are objective benefits to choosing the M4 Max Mac Studio model. It outpaces the M3 Ultra in single-core performance, which is the most critical element in making most everyday apps feel "fast."

The M4 Max chip was already released last year in the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro. It can be configured with up to a 16-core CPU, up to a 40-core GPU, and up to 128GB of unified RAM. Geekbench 6 benchmark results indicate that the M4 Max is up to 75% faster than the M2 Max chip available in the previous-generation Mac Studio.

M3 Ultra Chip

The all-new M3 Ultra chip features up to a 32-core CPU, with 24 performance cores and eight efficiency cores, and up to an 80-core GPU. Apple says the M3 Ultra chip is up to 1.5x faster than the previous Mac Studio's M2 Ultra chip, which has up to a 24-core CPU. Graphics performance is up to 2x faster than the previous Mac Studio with the M2 Ultra chip, which was available with up to a 72-core GPU. The M3 Ultra chip supports up to 512GB of unified RAM, whereas the M2 Ultra maxed out at 192GB of unified RAM. The Verge's Chris Welch:

The M3 Ultra chip is overkill for many. If you need this level of power, you already know exactly how you'll get the most from it. It's for visual effects artists and animators. It's for professionals doing ambitious audio and video production work. Are you regularly crunching big medical datasets? Maybe you can use all those cores and memory to their fullest potential. And as AI development continues to flourish, the kitted out configurations with 256GB or 512GB of memory could prove appealing to anyone interested in running sophisticated LLM models locally on their machine.

arsTechnica's Andrew Cunningham:

It's the magnitude of Apple's generation-over-generation updates that makes this Studio refresh feel odd, though. The lower-end Studio gets an M4 Max processor like you'd expect—the same chip Apple sells in its high-end MacBook Pros but fit into a desktop enclosure instead of a laptop. But the top-end Studio gets an M3 Ultra instead of an M4 Ultra. That's still a huge increase in CPU and GPU cores (and there are other Ultra-specific benefits, too), but it makes the expensive Studio feel like less of a step up over the regular one.

Thunderbolt 5 and Improved External Display Support

Following in the footsteps of MacBook Pro and Mac mini models with M4 Pro and M4 Max chips, the Mac Studio now supports Thunderbolt 5. There are four Thunderbolt 5 ports on Mac Studio configurations with the M4 Max chip, and six Thunderbolt 5 ports on configurations with the M3 Ultra chip. Thunderbolt 5 provides up to 120 Gb/s data transfer speeds. Tom's Guide's Alex Wawro:

While the USB-C ports on our Mac Studio M4 Max are capable of transmitting up to 10 GBp/second, the Thunderbolt 5 ports are theoretically capable of achieving up to 120GBp/second in certain conditions. And in standard use Thunderbolt 5 is specced to offer double the bandwidth capacity of Thunderbolt 4 (80 Gbps vs. 40 Gbps), which means it can move more data faster than its predecessors.

The practical payoff is that you can use a higher number of more capable displays via Thunderbolt 5 than Thunderbolt 4, for example, our Mac Studio M4 Max is rated to support up to five external displays (4 @6K/60Hz via Thunderbolt 5, 1 @4K/144Hz via HDMI) while the upgraded M3 Ultra model can supposedly support up to eight (at 6K/60Hz or 4K/144Hz) at once.

Alternatively, our M4 Max review unit can support a single 8K/60Hz display while the M3 Ultra version can support up to four 8K/60Hz displays. So if you really want to be future-proofed against a potential 8K future, the new Mac Studio has you covered.

If I were considering buying one of these Macs in 2025, I'd be more excited about the potential to build the ultimate workstation by investing in a great Thunderbolt 5 dock, along with a good display (honestly, I can live without Thunderbolt 5 speeds for my display needs) and a great Thunderbolt 5 external SSD for moving big files around fast.

And frankly, Thunderbolt 5 gear is still pretty sparse on the market despite the fact that the standard debuted in 2023. While you can buy 8K displays and 8K TVs right now, the fact is that 8K content only started arriving in small doses in 2023, and it's still very rare in Mac apps and streaming services.

So while it's great to get Thunderbolt 5 ports on the most powerful Mac desktop for the first time, it's not a great reason to upgrade unless you're really excited about investing in a lot of Thunderbolt 5 accessories.

Reviews

Articles
... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: M4 Max and M3 Ultra Mac Studio Reviews: Apple's Most Powerful Mac Ever
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Michaelgtrusa
no, apple told us official that not every M generation will get ultra...so, reading between the lines ,probably the M4 will not get Ultra, so M4 max is the best.
Odd not to get from the most expensive and large SoC the best in everything...you have to compromise a little on the SC
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Sounds like the M4 Max Mac Studio will be right for just about everybody, except for those needing high end graphics or faster graphic rendering speeds, faster video editing and video encoding speeds, users of large LLM models, or anyone else who needs a lot of fast unified memory RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vetiver1 and Huck
Sounds like the M4 Max Mac Studio will be right for just about everybody, except for those needing high end graphics or faster graphic rendering speeds, faster video editing and video encoding speeds, users of large LLM models, or anyone else who needs a lot of fast unified memory RAM.

I don't think any Studio system is right for everybody except those needing a higher-end machine. The majority should be purchasing a Mac Mini, if going with a desktop.

I've never seen a Studio, or know anyone that has any interest in one.
 
Still surprising to me they didn't engineer an M4 Ultra chip. Seems like a really odd thing. Like you have to figure there will be an M4 BTO config soon, right?
I'm sure there's some rationalisation why they so belatedly made a M3 Ultra (so long after the M3 Max debuted) and skipped the M4 Ultra - whether it's deeply technical or some boring logistical thing like having spare manufacturing capacity for the M3-making process (now it's been dropped from all the other Macs) - but it's certainly not based on a desire to offer the best product. Yeah, the ultra is targeted at multi-core optimised workflows, but they benefit just as much from faster cores, so the performance will be less than aM4 Ultra would have been.

From the outside looking in it does feel like something went wrong with the M4 Ultra and the M3 Ultra was a kludge...

Still, it's good to see that the M4 Max Studio is here and the design hasn't been "improved" by removing ports or hiding the power button... I think it offers better value for money & a better design than the fully tricked-out M4 Pro Mini.
 
I'm sure there's some rationalisation why they so belatedly made a M3 Ultra (so long after the M3 Max debuted) and skipped the M4 Ultra - whether it's deeply technical or some boring logistical thing like having spare manufacturing capacity for the M3-making process (now it's been dropped from all the other Macs) - but it's certainly not based on a desire to offer the best product. Yeah, the ultra is targeted at multi-core optimised workflows, but they benefit just as much from faster cores, so the performance will be less than aM4 Ultra would have been.

From the outside looking in it does feel like something went wrong with the M4 Ultra and the M3 Ultra was a kludge...

Still, it's good to see that the M4 Max Studio is here and the design hasn't been "improved" by removing ports or hiding the power button... I think it offers better value for money & a better design than the fully tricked-out M4 Pro Mini.
This is also my sentiment. A discounted M4 Max Studio entry model is a better value than most M4 Pro mini SKUs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWallace
I’m annoyed they didn’t update the Studio Display at the same time.
What to?

Apple don't make LCD panels and the market isn't exactly flooded with 5k3k display panels offering 120Hz and/or true local dimming (the "5k" ones you see are usually ultrawide 5120x2160 screens which have the same caveats as 4k displays).

There's a reason why the Studio Display panel has changed so little since 2014...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlaveToSwift
I'm debating whether to get a M4 Max with 64 or 128GB RAM.

I use it for FCPX editing, and I want to start getting into some basic sculpting using Blender this summer, so while I don't need 128GB RAM at the moment, I don't change computers very often so wonder whether it comes down to whether I should 'future proof'.

Saying that, its a big jump in price, and my future proofing in the past hasn't really added any value when it comes to selling later down the line! Leaning more towards sticking with 64GB......
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_J and Huck
Really wish I could get the M4Max with 256 GB because it'd probably be the best return on value/speed for my uses (large 3D modeling in Vectorworks, Twin Motion, and lots of photoshop).
 
  • Like
Reactions: picpicmac
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.