I
I think another factor would be that it would do more damage to the product, the Vision brand, and Apple, for Apple to offer a trade-in option, but then to offer an extremely low trade-in value.
I would not be so quick to say the product, or importantly any future line of Visions products, is a failure. It's a product that should bent in a similar category either as the "20th Anniversary Mac" or the first Macintosh.
How the Vision Pro will be viewed ten years from now will be far more important that what people are saying about it today.
Apple sells refurbished AirPods online.
The reason for Vision Pro not getting a trade-in is not because of “intimacy” or “hygiene,” it’s simply because it makes no business sense.
The whole purpose of trade-ins is to reduce the number of units available on the secondary market and reduce pressure on new model prices. Given Vision Pro is a commercial failure, there was never expectation of a trade-in program. Apple doesn’t need to interfere with the momentum of the secondary market because there’s not really one.
I think another factor would be that it would do more damage to the product, the Vision brand, and Apple, for Apple to offer a trade-in option, but then to offer an extremely low trade-in value.
I would not be so quick to say the product, or importantly any future line of Visions products, is a failure. It's a product that should bent in a similar category either as the "20th Anniversary Mac" or the first Macintosh.
How the Vision Pro will be viewed ten years from now will be far more important that what people are saying about it today.