I use a MacBook Air 2014 that I bought my wife new. Never had any security issues at all.
My two daughters use a MacBook Air 2014 and 2015 again no security issues and goodness knows what they do on them in their free time! Yes I am a good Daddy and do monitor the laptops frequently.
I venture to say, and wait to be shot down, that hackers still focus on Windows PC's and those of us with Mac's are relatively unscathed thus far. Certainly it's true in my world.
We do have Norton Security on all the laptops but I cannot evaluate how effective that is in the real world it's just something I pay for every year to make me feel more secure whether it is true or not!
No shootings here. Though, one can't see a successful hack with the naked eye. If you got pwned as a node in a command & control network, the only way you'd know is to forensically examine files, logs and network traffic at the level of packet source and destination. The most prolific diseases are more contagious than they are lethal.
Statistically, the majority of hacks are tailored to Windows because the numbers there are staggering. Therefore, statistically, that's where more people manage data and wealth, where more known vulnerabilities are left unpatched, where more security features are intentionally disabled, where more careless clicks allow malware to execute as admin. Amateur hackers get a boost from readily available modular malware kits, command & control servers for rent, and target lists for sale.
Unix was effectively nonexistent among consumers for its first forty years (1960s to 2000s), and remains a minority even today, despite the growing popularity of MacOS and iOS. However, as the platform grows market share, hackers will congeal like barnacles. The pricier buy-in for MacOS/iOS implies that Apple devices represent a greater concentration of wealth, making it more attractive to hack. Desktop Linux represents a growing demographic which might have reached 23 (Not percent. 23.), so Mac Users can still make dismissive fun of them.
Architecturally, Unix started on stronger bones, and benefited from decades of lessons learned, when Windows was a comparative noob. It takes a different degree of skill to hack Unix. Modern Windows is more like Unix than Microsoft will casually admit. Like MacOS and iOS, Windows 10-11 built-in safeguards and tools are pretty good without third party apps. Properly secured, Windows and MacOS/iOS are about as tight as possible while still remaining usable.
Users have always been the weak link in the kill chain. Someone in this thread made observed that anti-malware programs running on Macs don't necessarily aid or tighten the Mac; rather, they simply reduce re-transmission of windows exploits to other Windows users. That's true. The next level of anti-exploit apps could well be AI-bolstered nannies that do behavioral analytics, and treat you like the Heart of Gold's alternate computer personality.
As I understand it, Apple's planned fall-off in security patching for the 2014-15's final OS is yet to come?? But when that time DOES come, it might be irresponsible to use that OS in production without compensating controls that most users find formidable, finicky, frustrating and forcibly f____ed up.