Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mac mini 2018 Reviews Roundup: Long-Awaited Update Should Impress Fans and Pro Users, But Upgrade Options Can Get Pricey
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Thunderbolt 3 is backwards compatible with all older usb versions. You can connect any usb device to a thunderbolt port. So, yes you can connect the external SSD drive in the link to it. Older SSD drives with a USB-A connector might need a dongle (USB-A to USB-C).
'USB-C' only says something about the shape of the usb plug, but nothing about what kind of USB it supports or if it supports charging etc.
I know it can be confusing.
Here is some more information:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB-C
Last edited:
A $15 toaster is an appliance. A $1000, $2000, $3000, $4000 computer is not, it's an investment, unless he had plans to make computers for $15.
Last edited:
Because right now, a 9th Generation Core i7 w/ 8 Cores/8 Threads is a 95w TDP part and that is not going to work inside the Mac mini's chassis for at least three (3) different reasons. Cooling, power, availability.
A 65w TDP BGA (soldered) part has not been or even announced outside of confidential Intel roadmaps and a release will most likely not be until April of 2019. Intel can barely keep up with demand for 14nm parts now as it is and even halted production on the H310 PCH in order to make sure the other 14nm 300-Series chipsets (Z390, H370 and B360) would not be impacted.
At this price point ($1299 for the Core i7 BTO option), you are getting quite a bit of performance. I am sure that we will hear way more about the virtues and vices of the Mac mini moving forward from those who decide to go that route.
If you want a dedicated GPU, you can either get an eGPU or build yourself a Windows PC/Hackintosh.
The Late 2013 Mac Pro was dead end because the market pivoted from multiple GPUs working together to a single powerful GPU...Apple bet wrong and paid the price. Most of us here would agree that it was a low point in the life of the Mac Pro line and could have possibly been corrected WAY sooner. I wish it had been, but it is what it is.
Given that, there are still many happy 2013 Mac Pro owners out there, whose machines are happily chugging along, getting stuff done.
If the four (4) Thunderbolt 3 ports are just USB ports to you...well, that is your issue, not mine. Having access of up to 160Gbps of aggregate bandwidth, while still having the choice to repurpose a TB3 port as USB-C Gen 2 with 10Gbps of bandwidth for cheaper peripherals or if I need more than two USB 3.0 Type-A ports is of great value to me. So is the option of upgrading to 10Gbps Ethernet.
I am pretty sure that Apple is going to sell quite a few Mac minis moving forward.
You’re speaking blasphemy to even think the cult of Ive would allow an extra 5-10mm to allow room for a dGPU!!!
Everyone having a tizzy about being able to swap out the standard 8GB of RAM with 16GB on their own because they'll be damned if they'll pay the "Apple tax" haven't priced out memory.
Buying 16GB (2x8) DIMMS somewhere else, then going to all the trouble to take apart the mini to install it yourself — all to save $30 is rediculous.
If you want 32GB or 64GB, well then you could save some good money. But 16? Not worth thinking about.
Buying 16GB (2x8) DIMMS somewhere else, then going to all the trouble to take apart the mini to install it yourself — all to save $30 is rediculous.
If you want 32GB or 64GB, well then you could save some good money. But 16? Not worth thinking about.
I am pretty sure that was up to Intel and their integrated GPU.
Want more? eGPU.
No reference to power draw and "I can't hear it" isn't scientific data. This chap does need to take care of the leaves on his front yard.
You're just not using it right
So now you're resorting to making stuff up. Read up a bit.
Thanks ! I am really confused by it and I know I cannot remember this stuff more a longer time. I guess in some month I forgot again what works with
First, it's kind of rude to assume what a particular reviewer knows or doesn't know.
Second, how about this review. Bit more technical:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ew-5908.html&usg=AOvVaw26etCHbKMU4I1tdCQ6lk-s
That isn't making a good case. Four years on, you should be getting a lot more tech for your money. Losing 3/4 of your storage is also a huge issue as you cannot get back to the same point without spending a load more money. Bog standard HDMI should be fine for 4K content.
TB3 ports carry DP1.2 streams, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT206587 mentions Multi-stream transport (MST) which allows display daisy-chaining, but it's not really clear to me if it's supported for what you want to do. I wanted to do similar (2 4K on a single TB3 port with a simple DP adapter). I haven't got a satisfactory answer so I bought an OWC TB3 to Dual DP breakout box.
You get a USB SSD, right? I‘ll wager that Apple goes for the best-performing SATA-SSDs for a reason: APFS and their software pipeline.
Actually the NVME SSDs of today routinely perform at > 3000 MBps. Samsung 2TB SSD NVME goes for about $560 on Amazon. Apple used to have that special sauce with the first and second gen PCIe SSDs, but that was like 4 years ago. The market caught up and then some.
Don't understand how they can justify $1600 dollars for a 2TB SSD when you can buy one for $300ish on amazon. In a Macbook I get that it's integrated to make it small and portable but no-one gives a crap about this being half and inch bigger if it would save them > $1000. Apple's storage premium is getting more and more ridiculous. Look at the iPads for more insanity.
Somehow Apple always manages to find an excuse not to use the best CPUs (and GPUs to that matter).
I'm using an old Steve Jobs quote and implying you're not maybe using it for CPU intensive tasks. All Macs have poor cooling capabilities because they were designed that way. Do some research and you'll realise ALL Macs suffer from thermal throttling to some extent (do you even now what TT is?)
Well said.
From my perspective Apple has been playing a potentially dangerous game lately. It's simply economics.
If 100x people will buy your product at Y price point, you can increase the price to 2Y and perhaps 60x will still buy... maintaining revenue and increasing profit. Increase it again to 4Y and 35x will buy... Increase it again to 6Y and 20x will buy... But do this enough times and you'll end up with zero 'base' market and an uncertain future.
Is that were Apple is now? I wouldn't bet on it. But that is one possible future.
It's also ridiculously privileged of you to think that saving $30 is ridiculous, not value or good financial sense. Waste it if you want.
Supposedly, they have really addressed the thermals in this unit. Read the Tom's Hardware review.
To be frank, I'm not happy with 85°C. In summer the roomtemp may rise to 28°C (83°F) or so. IMHO any equipped should be able to run thermally stable at full load even at 30°C (85°F). I own a 2011 Server Mini -and the heatsink & cooling there is definitely insufficient. It's not just the cooler that needs to have enough surface, but in my opinion on a desktop there should be a decent copperblock on top of the CPU acting as thermal capacitor which absorbs any spikes, keeping the CPU at a more constant temperature.
Actually, it shouldn't be a big deal. A 35W CPU (?) should be quite easy to cool, especially if the 2 2,5" drives are no more (=enough space). Also, Apple could get creative, like Microsoft did on the surface Pro 4 with the cooling pad as part of the heatpipe cooling system. Unfortunately, proper thermal engineering doesn't seem to be one of Apples skills.