Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

xVeinx

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 9, 2006
361
0
California
Hi all,
I thought I would use folks here as a sounding board to make sure I'm still sane in my thinking :). I've been considering the basic Mac Mini for a simple developer machine. I would be essentially doing 4 things with the machine: writing code (python, perl, C++), running a statistical analysis package on small data sets (R), reading journal articles, and creating figures for journal articles using illustrator. Illustrator is pretty extensively used in my lab (they don't like LaTeX, :( ), and I've been having to switch back and forth between windows and linux, which gets a bit annoying (and also causes more work as we have a fairly old version of illustator on windows). I realize the processing limitations of the mini, and have a more powerful workstation/server that I would push the tough jobs onto, and so be running many things via the terminal. At that level, it would be there to allow me to do the every day stuff and do things more efficiently. Is this likely to overwork the mini? Or drive the fan to oblivion? Thanks for your thoughts :).
 

JDLang

macrumors newbie
Aug 4, 2011
28
0
Hi all,
I thought I would use folks here as a sounding board to make sure I'm still sane in my thinking :). I've been considering the basic Mac Mini for a simple developer machine. I would be essentially doing 4 things with the machine: writing code (python, perl, C++), running a statistical analysis package on small data sets (R), reading journal articles, and creating figures for journal articles using illustrator. Illustrator is pretty extensively used in my lab (they don't like LaTeX, :( ), and I've been having to switch back and forth between windows and linux, which gets a bit annoying (and also causes more work as we have a fairly old version of illustator on windows). I realize the processing limitations of the mini, and have a more powerful workstation/server that I would push the tough jobs onto, and so be running many things via the terminal. At that level, it would be there to allow me to do the every day stuff and do things more efficiently. Is this likely to overwork the mini? Or drive the fan to oblivion? Thanks for your thoughts :).

I have the Mac Mini server model (with no use of the server app at all). I write fortran and C++ codes to be run on large parallel super-computers. From my simulations, I routinely post process data files several Giga-bytes in size on my Mini using MatLab, Tecplot, Paraview, Mathematica, etc. This mini has no trouble doing FFT's on data consisting of ~ 3/4 Billion grid points, rendering multi-dimensional contour plots, creating .avi files from my CFD runs. It really has done everything I have asked it to do better than I expected. I will say that I do have 16 GB of RAM and the 256 GB SSD hard drive in my server which doesn't hurt when manipulating all that data.

I also write journal articles in LaTex (really MacTex) and for my figures, I use Tecplot to create .eps files. This is significantly different than illustrator, however, I don't think the Mini would have any issues with illustrator either.

I try to check my istat menu periodically throughout the day, and from what I have seen, I am far from "overworking" this mini or "driving the fan into oblivion." However, my office is maintained at about 67 degrees F and my mini sits elevated on an exposed table to allow the best circulation.

Anyways, from what I've read so far, the Mini is capable of handling your work load.
 

dolphin842

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2004
1,172
29
Although I've not gotten very far in my programming studies yet, my older 2010 mini seems to compile simple objective-c stuff just fine.
 

Snips

macrumors regular
Jan 9, 2008
152
4
Suffolk, UK
I'm a iOS app developer and use a 2011 Mac Mini (Server) for Xcode + it doubles as the web server, and it's totally fine.

I also use an old 2008 Core 2 Duo MacBook for Xcode + Adobe Illustrator, and that's quite bearable too - so, as you can see, the Mac Mini walks it ;)
 

tums

macrumors member
Oct 22, 2008
51
0
Nothing wrong with it for development. 8gb or 16gb and you should be good to go.
 

xVeinx

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 9, 2006
361
0
California
Thank you very much for the advice! I took the plunge and purchased a base mac mini and then upgraded the memory to 8 Gb. It's working out better than I hoped, and is generally fun to use :).
 

FluJunkie

macrumors 6502a
Jul 17, 2007
618
1
Yeah, honestly the Mac Mini seems like a pretty solid machine for middle-weight development and data analysis.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.