corywoolf said:I will try to do a more comprehensive image of what I think Leopard should look like when I have a bit more time. I am thinking they might include Windows support (built in). No more dual booting, and no sacrifice of speed. Maybe they will call it Rosetta 2.0 w/ Native Windows Apps support. Just a thought. Now fire up Shotoshop and start chopping up some screenshots already!
corywoolf said:I am thinking they might include Windows support (built in). No more dual booting, and no sacrifice of speed. Maybe they will call it Rosetta 2.0 w/ Native Windows Apps support. Just a thought. Now fire up Shotoshop and start chopping up some screenshots already!
Well I read that they would "probably" include some sort of "Boot Camp" bundled, but I didn't read that they were including the ability to run windows apps natively in OS X Leopard! If that's the case awesome, good news. Where did you read this?dornoforpyros said:You think this or you read it?
Because if they hide it, it would make it more difficult for the target audience (switchers) to find it.G99 said:
No that would be a bad thing, as soon as they do that boom now macs have all the viruses that PCs have. (There goes Apple's new ads out the window)corywoolf said:
corywoolf said:I will try to do a more comprehensive image of what I think Leopard should look like when I have a bit more time. I am thinking they might include Windows support (built in). No more dual booting, and no sacrifice of speed. Maybe they will call it Rosetta 2.0 w/ Native Windows Apps support. Just a thought. Now fire up Shotohop (Edit: I like the typo, so it's staying) and start chopping up some screenshots already!
... by implementing a sort of safesleep function. Hit a hot key> saves contents of RAM to disk> cubes over> bam, winblows. Hit the same key combo> the whole process goes in reverse.zap2 said:
I cropped it because I didn't have time to do everything I wanted to, and because I had like a ton of torrents on my desktop. The Windows icon in the dock is to show it is always running like the finder is. Ideally the windows icon in the menu bar would drop down and show the start menu. More to come soon.savar said:
Interestingly, you can already do this on PCs. It's not as simple as a hotkey, but you can hibernate Windows, reboot into Linux, and then return to Windows when you're done.Kingsly said:... by implementing a sort of safesleep function. Hit a hot key> saves contents of RAM to disk> cubes over> bam, winblows. Hit the same key combo> the whole process goes in reverse.
My plan, anyway.
Not necessarily, depends on how the virus functions, if it has to have specific lications (C:\) of course it won't work, it can't push itself to start up, the registry would be gone, even with an integration, i think Apple would redesign the PC's registry system. So not necessarilyPBG4 said:
nah, man...corywoolf said:
Well unfortunately it's one or the other. More effects = more video card muscle.Benjamindaines said:
Apple has OpenGL... they will find a way (or atleast a better one then MS did)matticus008 said:
No, they won't find a way that spontaneously requires less advanced hardware. Apple is not in the magic business, and OpenGL has some serious limitations compared to Direct3D (which is why Apple is fortunate to have developed robust Core technologies). The graphics technology required for Tiger is similar to the hardware required for Vista, so Apple products are already at that spec. The only reason the Vista matter is blown out of proportion is because this is the first time Windows actually takes advantage of any graphics hardware, something OS X has been doing for years.Benjamindaines said:
