Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mac OS X Intel Developer Box Feedback



Appleinsider has posted some subjective feedback from developers regarding the speed of the Mac OS X Intel developer boxes which were sold to developers for $999.

The $999 developer boxes house a 3.6GHz Pentium 4 and a standard PC motherboard, allowing it to boot Windows. As has been hinted previously, nothing definitive about the final Mac-Intel design can be gained from the current developer design.

Previous benchmarks demonstrated how well Rosetta (the PowerPC emulator) faired. And the comments by some developers have commented that PowerPC apps run at approximately 60-70% their native speed -- with some apps, such as Firefox, running at full speed.
 
Strange that it is so fast already, has Apple really been lying to us all these years?
 
Not much news here. I would have like to hear more about compatibility problems with altivec-based programs. I guess we have to wait and see, what will and what won't run in emulation.
 
Mac-Xpert said:
Not much news here. I would have like to hear more about compatibility problems with altivec-based programs. I guess we have to wait and see, what will and what won't run in emulation.
Click to expand...

i think altivec is the cause of the 65% speed reductions...
 
Surreal said:
i think altivec is the cause of the 65% speed reductions...
Click to expand...
I don't know. I thought that altivec code would not run at all. So apps like Apples own Logic that depend on altivec would probably not run at all under Rosseta. I would like to hear from developers a bit more on that topic.
 
mad jew said:
Same. I really can't wait for the laptops to be honest. I reckon they'll be the ones to benefit the most in the short term.
Click to expand...

Yeah I can't wait for the Power Macs. Im gonna be in the market about two years from now (maybe 3 actually). And I'm veeeeeeeeewwy anxious to get my first Power Mac.
 
I knew all this time that Intel Pentiums were better than PowerPC.... next news please...

By this time next year, hopefully, my thinkpad is history and I will have a nice PowerBook running OS X/Intel
 
See now, there are two things that are wrong about the article, in my mindset.

1). They say Windows XP is "blazing." Compared to what? Virtual PC? A 3.6GHz P4 doesn't really "blaze" at XP, unless you're doing basic stuff...I can't see how this system would be anything special compared to any other x86 box, so I don't even see the relevance of this comment.

2). There's absolutely no benchmarks/comparions/etc. You can't compare web browsers...that's just stupid. Perhaps they could provide us with some evidence...

Then again, no one has to do anything, so I should stop complaining :D.
 
wishfull thinking?

so, when the macintel ibooks come out next year, and they will be able to dual-boot windows, will they have enough oomph to play windows games? i don't do fps, but i'd still like to be impressed by my graphics on say, guild wars. it's possible we could end up with the best of both worlds, if apple plays it right
 
Is there any speculation what cpu will be used? I know that the developer box contains a Pentium, but I hope that Intel ahs something new and/or different to offer.
 
Probably a substandard idea, but I've got no shortage...

Does anyone who has the Developer Box think that it's worth $1499 as a PC alone?

While I don't need a new Mac right away, I have for some time been thinking about (1) learning some programming and (2) getting a PC for some PC-only applications.

So, query: How would a Developer Box stack up against a general-production $1499 PC?

(I say $1499, because I'd have to pick up the $500 Dev. Membership in addition to the $999 price tag.)
 
Macrumors said:
Previous benchmarks demonstrated how well Rosetta (the PowerPC emulator) faired.
Click to expand...

It's "fared," not "faired."

And the comments by some developers have commented that PowerPC apps run at approximately 60-70% their native speed -- with some apps, such as Firefox, running at full speed.
Click to expand...

Is that 60-70% of the speed of the app running on a dual 2.7-GHz G5? If the test boxes were dual 2.7 GHz Pentiums, the speed comparisons would be meaningful. I'd say that the clock speed and the number of processors have to be the same to make a valid comparison figure.
 
I love that one of the most touted speed increases in this article is "Web pages seem to just snap onto the screen, like using IE for Windows"

After millions of dollars of development, years of rewriting code, and pushing users yet again to a new platform, could we at long last have found teh snappy!?!?!
 
Mac-Xpert said:
I don't know. I thought that altivec code would not run at all. So apps like Apples own Logic that depend on altivec would probably not run at all under Rosseta. I would like to hear from developers a bit more on that topic.
Click to expand...

Altivec is not being emulated, but most applications gracefully handle the removal of altivec, and will run in "G3" mode. The notable exceptions are those programs (like iDVD) that require a "G4 or better" processor to run. And most of those applications will already be ported to "universal binaries".
 
RHutch said:
About what do you think that they were lying?
Click to expand...

well they have had osx running on intel boxes from the beginning which mean sthat the whole "mega-hertz myth" was just a ruse to buy time until they could switch to intel.
 
iJaz said:
Strange that it is so fast already, has Apple really been lying to us all these years?
Click to expand...

Not lying. Steve's Reality Distortion Field bubble has moved from the PPC to Intel so the speed performance from that enhancement is gone.
 
the macintels look promising. the good feedback is taking its toll on my buying pattern though-

1. i want a new imac soon. i think i'm gonna get the next revision
BECAUSE
2. i don't like rev A machines. i've had problems in the past and don't want to go through that again. there are bound to be issues (fans, buzzing, the usual)

3. by the time my 2.3 or 2.5 g5 imac needs to be updated, 99.99% of the issues with the switch over should be taken cafe of.

I think a lot of people feel this way too. thats why i dont think mac sales will suffer between now and the transition. if you need a new mac, get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back