I miss Steve so much. He truly was the soul of Apple. I always wonder how different would Apple be if he was still here.and oh god, do i miss steve
They’ve done maintenance releases a few times since Steve died. But it never delievered. The problem is that Apple should fix lot of things in design, ease of use and juice up the whole user experience. I personally don’t want Apple to just fix and polish their stuff. They need to bring new and exciting ideas.That would take the kind of “courage” Apple isn’t interested in.
Would be great to be able to turn off software update entirely. In Windows 10, a group policy can hide the entire Windows Update interface, which is amazing for people who don’t want to update their machine.You can set this up in MacOS to require approval. I have mine automatically download but it doesn’t get installed until I’m ready and approve. On iOS it pops up every once in a while asking for permission but nothing has gotten installed without my approval there either.
I honestly wish they would do this every other year. There just isn't enough real new stuff to justify new OS's every year in my opinion. They should alternate new features and refinement each year, and support the refined version longer/never end machine support on a new feature release, but on a refined release. basically, I'd like them to have an LTS version of the OS every 2-3 years. Now the cycle is so damn fast they never completely fix bugs in one OS before they ship a new buggy one. Granted I haven't had too terrible bugs lately. But I've had weird WiFi issues off and on, and my backgrounds don't like to adjust day to night properly in Sonoma like they used to before.Apple could do the same when the first macOS that drops support for x86 chips launches.
Mission Control was introduced in OS X Lion (10.7)I still think Snow Leopard was my most favorite version of OS X (macOS). I have fond memories of it for some reason. Specifically, I really loved how Mission Control worked with the third mouse button. I was able to quickly navigate between programs with ease and speed. I forget right now what came after SL, but they changed how Mission Control worked and I was sorely disappointed.
they did, but didn't seem to last longStill wish they did Safari for Windows…
I think you are right.I can’t remember if there was a USB option but I got a disc. Maybe Lion was the one with USB?
I feel like OSes are the eventful things they were back in the "big cat" era, the all seem to have their own personalities.…as we’re 10.11 El Capitan and 10.13 High Sierra - both of which I preferred over their predecessors.
10.14 Mojave was a farewell to this era, the „Intel“ era of the Macintosh.
10.15 Catalina was a transitional release (breaking many 32-bit apps and drivers), as was 11 Big Sure - both not great.
After that, it just becomes a big blur for me.
Snow Leopard is my go-to for 2004-2009 Macs because it's good on both PPC & Intel. I installed it over the weekend on an iBook G4 I had in storage. Still great.
Maybe you are thinking of Tiger (10.4)? Much of Snow Leopard (10.6) was rewritten for 64-bit. Tiger had some support for 64-bit but practically it was not practical.Wasn't this "the worlds most advanced 64-bit operating system" that shipped with 64-bit mode disabled??