Some MacBook Airs had Snow Leopard on USB in the box, Lion was the only one that had the option for retail (and no option for a disk, it was either App Store download or USB and most people just did the App Store download making the USBs somewhat rare and collectable – I have one).I can’t remember if there was a USB option but I got a disc. Maybe Lion was the one with USB?
Or have a version called macOS Professional that allows customising software updating policies on user side so they have control how often the update will be installed. In addition, delay new feature roll out for this version for at least 6 months, giving business users ample opportunity to test the newer release before rolling out new features. Allow installers to customise what to be installed in macOS and what not to, so unwanted components don’t even exist in the base system, and more.id pay $199 for a "macOS Pro" forked build thats literally just stability and bugfix/performance updates with no new features
Workplaces can prevent users from installing MacOS updates until the IT department approves the update, this is a feature which already exists.Or have a version called macOS Professional that allows customising software updating policies on user side so they have control how often the update will be installed. In addition, delay new feature roll out for this version for at least 6 months, giving business users ample opportunity to test the newer release before rolling out new features. Allow installers to customise what to be installed in macOS and what not to, so unwanted components don’t even exist in the base system, and more.
Pretty much the same here. Lion dropped so many features, and was a mess, like an unfinished update, that I suck with Snow Leopard. Lion being the first version of the Mac OS that I’ve ever skipped, going back to version 5 or 6. Mt Lion fixed some stuff and broke other things. Since the, the Mac OS has lost so much quality over the year, that I dread updates. Starting in a Mojave, Apple has created bugs that it takes them many major revisions to even fix, at all. It’s been really bad since Big Sur, with Monterey being slightly better, the Ventura and Sonoma have major unfixed bugs. For me, Catalina, while having some issues, was the last truly ok version of macOS.
I skipped all versions from Yosemite to Big Sur because I disliked the flat design.…as we’re 10.11 El Capitan and 10.13 High Sierra - both of which I preferred over their predecessors.
10.14 Mojave was a farewell to this era, the „Intel“ era of the Macintosh.
10.15 Catalina was a transitional release (breaking many 32-bit apps and drivers), as was 11 Big Sure - both not great.
After that, it just becomes a big blur for me.
Mediocre for users which Apple sees no value, but great for shareholders which gives Apple money to thrive and grow. Tim Cook is the best person to make stakeholders happy, but arguably the worst person to keep customers happy. Sadly, we are in a world where customers are nothing. Absolutely nothing for those megacorps.Clueless Cook was so mediocre that he fired Forstall and didn't recognize Forstall's value. No wonder we haven't had another Snow Leopard!
Shareholders ain’t gonna be happy. In fact, I bet they are going to be furious if they realise Apple doesn't want to release any new feature for a whole year, as fixing bugs wont wow potential new customers, which hinder company growth. But by Then Apple would carry years worth of trash and left behind bugs in their code base to move along, eventually hitting a point where they are forced to do so anyway while enduring the wrath from shareholders accusing them why they don’t fix their software sooner.They need to do this again, tell every product manager that their feature work isnt more important than bug swatting, stability, or security and use one full release cycle for stability, security, and refinement
Shareholders will be furious if Apple takes pro-customer approach. I can’t think of any other outcome.Back when macos didn’t bring any new features for 3 years straight and everybody was happy nonetheless. Steve’s Apple at its best…
I wonder what would happen if they took a similar approach at macos today, like - one year new features, next year stability improvements. Or heck, why not polish the system continously for the next two years. It soo needs it, hot pile of mess. I doubt anyone would complain. What Apple has been throwing at us for the past few years are mostly little featurettes that could have been released as a part of an incremental update anyway.
This should not be limited to just workplace, but to anyone who wants more control over when and how the update gets installed. WFH workers will appreciate it.Workplaces can prevent users from installing MacOS updates until the IT department approves the update, this is a feature which already exists.
G4 Cube can't run Snow Leopard.I can only wish Apple would reverse course on all of the grey and light grey on white off white and what not poor contrast stuff in the operating system.
Snow Leopard was fantastic, it was fast stable and colorful. I still have it on G4 Cubes and a mac mini. It is a breath of fresh air to use it nowadays. Everything is in color. Finder supports custom icons and color. Control Panel is as you expect it. ... Love the old iTunes too.
Ditto, compared to the cost of windows updates and others it was a deal! I wonder if you could ever promote software that has 0 new features again. I remember actually appreciated the focus on making the core product better at that time.I purchased it, no regrets
Yah, but I don't miss the days of multiple CDs and staying at work until midnight to reinstall a system! Or finding/ typing in those registration numbers.Still have* a boxed copy! Apple used to make wonderful software boxes.
*(Yes, this is an example of how bad my box packaging problem is.)
I watch old Steve keynotes like they‘re movies; they’re just entertaining and enjoyable. A nice escape to a very-much-missed time gone by.and oh god, do i miss steve