Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ioioi

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 1, 2011
14
0
Hello,

I'm thinking of upgrading my 2009 Mac Pro 2.66 Quad-Core Intel Xeon from 6GB (current configuration is 2GBx3 DDR3 ECC 1066) to 12GB (4GBx3).

My question is what is the difference between buying a matched set like this, or a standard set like this? Is there any advantage, and if so what is it? I work with video/music applications in 64bit mode and speed/multitasking are the most important factors to me.

Also, is OWC the best place to purchase memory, or is there another vendor that is recommended?

Thanks!
~ :apple:
 
I have the latter one in my MacPro 2009 and they work fine. I wouldn't pay the extra for the first set. I bought from OWC.
 
I suppose the matched set would make the most of the triple-channel...but the speed benefit of that is negligible anyway. save your money.
 
Thanks for the quick responses. I'm just confused what the real difference is between the 'matched' and 'unmatched'?



Isn't it significantly better performance to have a triple channel configuration rather than dual?

ABSOLUTELY NOT! Many real world tests have shown the difference is insignificant. In fact, your more likely to have a performance hit from too little mem.

cheers
JohnG
 
Thanks for the helpful information, I really appreciate it.

Now my only other question is the where the best place to buy ram would be? Has anyone tried http://datamem.com? The prices are significantly better than OWC, although I don't know anything about them. Any input would be appreciated ... ;)
 
How did you even find a link to the matched set? That's really old as far as I know - they were the first 4GB DIMMS they offered and have the caveat that they can be the only kind of DIMMS in the system.

The current kit they sell is the $230 one (I believe).

I just purchased that for my Mac Pro and it works fine, but to be honest, there are very very few apps I run that can use that much memory. Even with tons of apps open at once, including 64-bit Aperture with a 100GB RAW library, I can't get it to use much more than 6GB of RAM. I'm not sure it was worth it to be honest.
 
Thanks for the helpful information, I really appreciate it.

Now my only other question is the where the best place to buy ram would be? Has anyone tried http://datamem.com? The prices are significantly better than OWC, although I don't know anything about them. Any input would be appreciated ... ;)

I'm using these mem modules in my 2010 MP and they should work in your MP:

http://www.superbiiz.com/detail.php?name=W1333EB4GA&title=Super-Talent-DDR3-1333-4GB-ECC-Server-Memory-For-Apple-Mac-Pro-Systems

You can also get a $15 coupon if you search the net.

regards
JohnG
 
How did you even find a link to the matched set? That's really old as far as I know - they were the first 4GB DIMMS they offered and have the caveat that they can be the only kind of DIMMS in the system.

I just googled "12GB OWC Matched Set +3x4GB" and behold, there it was. It says Xserve on the search results if that means anything.

I just purchased that for my Mac Pro and it works fine, but to be honest, there are very very few apps I run that can use that much memory. Even with tons of apps open at once, including 64-bit Aperture with a 100GB RAW library, I can't get it to use much more than 6GB of RAM. I'm not sure it was worth it to be honest.

Have you ever pushed it beyond the scope of what you described to see if your system is going beyond the 6GB? I do quite a bit of After Effects, Zrbush, etc. and my system is pushed to the max with my current 6GB configuration. Hopefully when I get the extra ram it will be a huge improvement.


Those are 1333MHz, so my Early 2009 Mac Pro would be running them @ 1066Mhz, correct?

Thanks for all the info, it definitely helps.
 
Last edited:
Check the activity monitor. If you are getting a lot of page outs then you need more RAM. I recently upgraded from 4gb to 7gb and it certainly made a world of difference.
 
snip........................

Those are 1333MHz, so my Early 2009 Mac Pro would be running them @ 1066Mhz, correct?

Thanks for all the info, it definitely helps.

Yes, the memory will run at 1033. That's NO problem because there's absolutely NO gain in running memory at 1333.

1333 is a total BS selling point and has virtually ZERO real-world performance benefits.

regards
JohnG
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.