mac vs. pc flash performance benchmark

[ewinemiller]

With the updated version

133 fps on a 933 PIII Coppermine

171 fps on a 1ghz PIII Tualatin

 

[MacBandit]

Originally posted by Shadowfax
well, i got safari v64

slightly better performance on the test.

i went from 136 in v62 to 138 in v64. so it's negligible.

What about the difference between v60 and v62 or v64?

 

[shadowfax]

Originally posted by MacBandit
What about the difference between v60 and v62 or v64?

Rower has identical specs to my computer, and was running V60 awhile ago when he did the tests.

he got 280-290 (v60) to my 309 (v62) on the 1st test when we finally both had the same plugin, and i think Rower said he was getting about 125 on the second one, but that was probably with v62.

 

[Rower_CPU]

I used v60 on all of them. I haven't bothered to try to grab v62/4 yet...

 

[Mr. Anderson]

So I just tried the flash benchmarker on my dual 1.25 with the old Safari (60) and the new one and there really wasn't any difference. 83-86 for both on several runs.

D

 

[FelixDerKater]

32 frames????
That is lousy...

I was running Safari v.73 with Folding@Home running in the background, along with iTunes, AIM, and Entourage open.

 

[XnavxeMiyyep]

I only got 66 fps (8561) on my DP 867 G4 with 768 MB of RAM. 32 MB video card. OS X 10.2.5