Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you want design, go for the underperforming macbook.
If you want design and some power, go for the air.
If you want design,and power, but don't mind a bit heavier machine, the 13" macbook pro is the one.

Just make sure any of them have at least SSD and 8gb ram, and you're set.
Stick to your budget, and wait for the Sept/Oct updates, and go enjoy the options of current + newer models to pick from.

This is how I tell it to my family:

If you are a facebooker, writers, or not tech savvy, then macbook is affordable, and great all in one that's easy to take everywhere and you look great.

If you are that, but you want a bit more out of it, and a bit bigger screen, go with the Air.

If you want to play some games, do video editing, or real photoshop work etc. Then go with the ssd solution of the 13" macbook pro.

Literally just answered my question, I was going to suggest the latest Macbook Air for the screen size, then I was going to ask if I made a mistake in purchasing it LOL. I went from 2009 27 iMac. So yeah having adjustment issues.
 
I had the 11" MBA 2012, 2013, and 2014. All of them with 8GB ram and the latter two with 256GB SSD.

I recently switched to a base 2016 Macook 12". Could not be happier, except for the keyboard maybe.

Don't buy old tech MBA. I could not go back to that ugly and small screen, the huge bezels and crappy speakers. Neither would I want the slower SSD, larger foot print, heavier weight, boring silver color and occasionally noicy fans.

On paper my old mba was a bit faster but in reality the macbook 12 definitely feels faster for everyday usage.

The heaviest workload on my macbook is virtualizing windows 10 on parallels, which works like a charm.

The only substantial slowdown I've found on the Macbook 12 is when I airplay a hd vlc ace stream to my ATV4 in windows 10 running under parallels desktop. My mba had problems with this too and fans always kicked full rpm. The mba coped just a bit better.

Go with the Macbook 12!
 
  • Like
Reactions: izzyfanto
I had the 11" MBA 2012, 2013, and 2014. All of them with 8GB ram and the latter two with 256GB SSD.

I recently switched to a base 2016 Macook 12". Could not be happier, except for the keyboard maybe.

Don't buy old tech MBA. I could not go back to that ugly and small screen, the huge bezels and crappy speakers. Neither would I want the slower SSD, larger foot print, heavier weight, boring silver color and occasionally noicy fans.

On paper my old mba was a bit faster but in reality the macbook 12 definitely feels faster for everyday usage.

The heaviest workload on my macbook is virtualizing windows 10 on parallels, which works like a charm.

The only substantial slowdown I've found on the Macbook 12 is when I airplay a hd vlc ace stream to my ATV4 in windows 10 running under parallels desktop. My mba had problems with this too and fans always kicked full rpm. The mba coped just a bit better.

Go with the Macbook 12!

Keyboard was a deal breaker for me and the single port was another black mark. I do like the design though. However, the keyboard/port taken together with the price and I think the MacBook Air is a more more versatile and better performing machine at much better value.

I went with a Macbook Air 13, despite the 'Don't Buy' warning and the naysayers clamouring for Retina and Skylake/Kaby Lake. The moment I opened it, I knew I'd made the right choice for me.

Everyone's mileage varies. Get the machine that meets your needs, tastes and budget.
 
Not really. I keep seeing here this idea that the 13" Pro is better than the Air.

The reality, configured with the best available CPU (dual core Broadwell i7) for each, those chips are the same architecture and generation, same cache: the chip in Pro is slightly faster, the chip in the Air is better at conserving battery.

They each have the same integrated graphics processor with both borrowing the same amount of slow memory from system RAM: its the same except the Pro has to work a lot harder driving 4 times as many pixels in the retina display.

The Air is thinner, lighter, has a longer lasting battery and configured similarly, costs less. the only real advantage the 13" Pro can have performance wise is if you spring for the 16GB of RAM. what it really has, if that is something you want to pay for, is the retina screen. and that comes at the cost of performance and battery life.

If performance is truly the goal, the quad core 15" with discrete graphics (with it's own un-shared memory) is actually the machine you want.

the 13" Pro is what Apple sold as the MacBook before the MacBook was re-birthed as a fashion accessory.
Good points.
Don't buy MacBook: terrible keyboard and no ports.
If you can tolerate the keyboard and aren't going to really be plugging peripherals in, the Retina Macbook is probably fine.

If you need a bit more power, a better battery, want a keyboard that doesn't feel like you're typing on a piece of metal -- or if you want the flexibility to charge your machine and plug in any peripheral at the same time, get the Air.

I write a lot, and the Retina MacBook's keyboard just killed me, so I gave it to my girlfriend and went back to my 11" MBA. The screen on that thing is lovely, but I liked nothing else about it.

Last note: you won't realize how much you liked Magsafe until you lose it. Being able to attach your power cord with one hand seems trivial, but it's seriously a great design and grabbing your laptop with one hand and your USB-C cord with the other gets old really quick.
I had the 11" MBA 2012, 2013, and 2014. All of them with 8GB ram and the latter two with 256GB SSD.

I recently switched to a base 2016 Macook 12". Could not be happier, except for the keyboard maybe.

Don't buy old tech MBA. I could not go back to that ugly and small screen, the huge bezels and crappy speakers. Neither would I want the slower SSD, larger foot print, heavier weight, boring silver color and occasionally noicy fans.

On paper my old mba was a bit faster but in reality the macbook 12 definitely feels faster for everyday usage.

The heaviest workload on my macbook is virtualizing windows 10 on parallels, which works like a charm.

The only substantial slowdown I've found on the Macbook 12 is when I airplay a hd vlc ace stream to my ATV4 in windows 10 running under parallels desktop. My mba had problems with this too and fans always kicked full rpm. The mba coped just a bit better.

Go with the Macbook 12!
I liked the screen and speakers on the rMB. But I liked the MBA keyboard more. MBA bezel and screen are pretty hideous though. But my fingers don't hurt after typing though and I don't make as many errors. For me, VM W10 was always sluggish on the rMB. Even with splitting VM resources 50/50 and nothing else running.
Keyboard was a deal breaker for me and the single port was another black mark. I do like the design though. However, the keyboard/port taken together with the price and I think the MacBook Air is a more more versatile and better performing machine at much better value.

I went with a Macbook Air 13, despite the 'Don't Buy' warning and the naysayers clamouring for Retina and Skylake/Kaby Lake. The moment I opened it, I knew I'd made the right choice for me.

Everyone's mileage varies. Get the machine that meets your needs, tastes and budget.
You nailed it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Osty
I had the 11" (...) I recently switched to a base 2016 Macook 12". Could not be happier, except for the keyboard maybe.

Don't buy old tech MBA. I could not go back to that (...) larger foot print, heavier weight, (..)

Huuuuge difference. Frankly, holding them in hand, the difference in size and weight is basically non existent. Which is the one thing I hold against Apple: Loads of compromises (not user-changeable battery, one port, rubbish keyboard, no fan etc.) just to bring out a machine with a retina display that otherwise is same or inferior? Nope, still don't get the new Macbook, other than it being 'prettier'.

11" Air:
  • Height: 0.11-0.68 inch (0.3-1.7 cm)
  • Width: 11.8 inches (30 cm)
  • Depth: 7.56 inches (19.2 cm)
  • Weight: 2.38 pounds (1.08 kg)3
12" Retina:
  • Height: 0.14–0.52 inch (0.35–1.31 cm)
  • Width: 11.04 inches (28.05 cm)
  • Depth: 7.74 inches (19.65 cm)
  • Weight: 2.03 pounds (0.92 kg)2

http://www.apple.com/macbook-air/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs/
 
Huuuuge difference. Frankly, holding them in hand, the difference in size and weight is basically non existent. Which is the one thing I hold against Apple: Loads of compromises (not user-changeable battery, one port, rubbish keyboard, no fan etc.) just to bring out a machine with a retina display that otherwise is same or inferior? Nope, still don't get the new Macbook, other than it being 'prettier'.

11" Air:
  • Height: 0.11-0.68 inch (0.3-1.7 cm)
  • Width: 11.8 inches (30 cm)
  • Depth: 7.56 inches (19.2 cm)
  • Weight: 2.38 pounds (1.08 kg)3
12" Retina:
  • Height: 0.14–0.52 inch (0.35–1.31 cm)
  • Width: 11.04 inches (28.05 cm)
  • Depth: 7.74 inches (19.65 cm)
  • Weight: 2.03 pounds (0.92 kg)2

http://www.apple.com/macbook-air/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs/
I purchased a 11" MBA a couple years ago and found the screen to be claustrophobic, yet for whatever reason, the 12" rMB screen was ok for me
 
Huuuuge difference. Frankly, holding them in hand, the difference in size and weight is basically non existent. Which is the one thing I hold against Apple: Loads of compromises (not user-changeable battery, one port, rubbish keyboard, no fan etc.) just to bring out a machine with a retina display that otherwise is same or inferior? Nope, still don't get the new Macbook, other than it being 'prettier'.

11" Air:
  • Height: 0.11-0.68 inch (0.3-1.7 cm)
  • Width: 11.8 inches (30 cm)
  • Depth: 7.56 inches (19.2 cm)
  • Weight: 2.38 pounds (1.08 kg)3
12" Retina:
  • Height: 0.14–0.52 inch (0.35–1.31 cm)
  • Width: 11.04 inches (28.05 cm)
  • Depth: 7.74 inches (19.65 cm)
  • Weight: 2.03 pounds (0.92 kg)2

http://www.apple.com/macbook-air/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs/

Yeah the differences between these aren't as drastic it seems. The biggest problem with the 11inch is the screen bezel, it really makes the computer seem small and less capable than it actually is. But the shape/weight of the machine is near perfect.

In comparison to the 13inch MBA the 12" Retina is quite small though. The 13inch MBA kind of lost it's "small" qualities a while ago, it's still thin and light... but the footprint is bigger than the 13" MBP.

If they can give the rMB at least 1 more USB-C port... that would help drastically. Having to carry around a dongle to charge and use a peripheral is very annoying on a high end computer. It's hard to beat thunderbolt, 2 USB3s and magsafe for versatility in a small package.
 
Is one still expected this year?

https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/macbook-air/

Citing a source within the Chinese supply chain, Japanese site Mac Otakara said Apple would announce new MacBook Air models within the month of June, with shipments set to begin in August, but no such announcement happened.
….

June is long gone with no sign of a new MacBook Air, but a report from DigiTimes says Apple is still planning on introducing a new MacBook Air with USB-C ports.
….

Bloomberg has also confirmed that Apple is working on a new MacBook Air with a USB-C port, but the report does not mention whether other MacBook Air specs will be refreshed.
 
Yeah the differences between these aren't as drastic it seems. The biggest problem with the 11inch is the screen bezel, it really makes the computer seem small and less capable than it actually is. But the shape/weight of the machine is near perfect.

In comparison to the 13inch MBA the 12" Retina is quite small though. The 13inch MBA kind of lost it's "small" qualities a while ago, it's still thin and light... but the footprint is bigger than the 13" MBP.

If they can give the rMB at least 1 more USB-C port... that would help drastically. Having to carry around a dongle to charge and use a peripheral is very annoying on a high end computer. It's hard to beat thunderbolt, 2 USB3s and magsafe for versatility in a small package.
I agree, at least one extra port would help a lot. I would still miss magsafe though and not sure if I could ever get used to that keyboard. Might be ok for those using two fingers but for a proper typist I find it impossible to find a rhythm on this iPad type surface.
The bezel on the 11" only disturbs when you open it. Once you start using it you don't notice it much anymore.
 
I agree, at least one extra port would help a lot. I would still miss magsafe though and not sure if I could ever get used to that keyboard. Might be ok for those using two fingers but for a proper typist I find it impossible to find a rhythm on this iPad type surface.
The bezel on the 11" only disturbs when you open it. Once you start using it you don't notice it much anymore.
Yep and yep. Huge increase of typing errors and lack of speed. Not to mention the lack of travel would make my fingers tingle/slightly numb after typing on it for long periods.
 
I switched from a 2012 11" i7 2.0 Air to 2016 12" 1.3 m7 MB. Only for iMovie imports or Video editing type of cpu intensive tasks, I do not feel any lack in speed. In fact, since the memory and the flash disk is faster than the Air, this machine feels just as fast if not faster than the Air for ordinary use.

I solved the single port problem with a Hootoo adapter. After 3 months of living with the 12" MB, my only complaint is still the keyboard. It is not unlivable but still feels weird.

Whatever I threw at this machine, it handled very well and did not get any hotter than my Air with its fan blowing like a hair dryer.

I don't miss MagSafe one bit as the MagSafe 2 used to inadvertently disconnect far too frequently and piss me off to no end.

Oh, last but not least, 12" MB beats the Air for battery life. I used to get about 4 hours on the average on my Air, and the 12" MB runs at least twice as long doing similar things.

In conclusion, I'm happy about my "courageous" choice and don't miss my old Air.
 
Oh, last but not least, 12" MB beats the Air for battery life.

Well that is not surprising, since you are comparing it to a 2012 MBA. In 2013, Apple greatly increased the battery life on the MBA. Apple currently rates battery life at 9 hours on the 11" Macbook Air and 10 hours on the Macbook…. pretty similar.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.