• Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

AJB1971

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 23, 2011
220
182
Six Colors -

MKBHD -

CNET -

SuperSaf -

Engadget

TechCrunch -

TechRadar -

CNBC -

PC Mag -

Pocket-lint -
 
Last edited:

ascender

macrumors 68040
Dec 8, 2005
3,843
1,716
Thanks for sharing, I didn't realise so many first impressions had come out already.

I know its not really relevant if you need macOS, but the performance comparison with the new iPads is quite eye-opening.

geekbench-air-ipad-6c.png
 
Last edited:
Comment

Ybersetzer

macrumors member
May 3, 2019
69
44
Germany
Major props to the OP for gathering all the links! Thanks!

Jason Snell (sixcolors, first link) makes a rather unbelievable mistake in his review though, I guess this will be updated and corrected shortly:

"
Worth the wait?
If there’s a real revelation to be had in my test results, though, it’s the performance of the iPad Pro. This isn’t the new 2020 model that’s due out next week, either—it’s the third-generation iPad Pro that was released the same day as the first Retina MacBook Air model. The 2018 iPad Pro was nearly five times as fast in single-core performance and nearly seven times as fast in multi-core performance."

He then gives the respective geekbench-results, but treats the iPad Pro`s (high) Geekbench 4 scores as if they were Geekbench 5 .... The iPad Pro is still faster, but not 5 TIMES!
 
Comment

neverendingscot

macrumors member
Feb 20, 2015
83
34
Anyone seen any Geekbench 5 scores yet? All I've seen is 4. Want to compare it to my current Mac but I only have the 5 scores for it, not the 4.
 
Comment

neverendingscot

macrumors member
Feb 20, 2015
83
34
I haven't been able to find the Geekbench 4 scores either. Do you have a link?
It was in one of the articles in the OP, I forget which one. For some reason they used a few older benchmarks like geekbench 4 and cinebench r15 instead of r20.
 
Comment

imp3rator

macrumors 6502
Dec 25, 2019
402
282
For even basic users, however, I’d recommend adding $100 back onto the system price in order to upgrade to an i5. That’s the chip ours came with. The system scored 5244 and 14672 on Geekbench 4’s single and multi-core tests, respectively, presenting a marked upgrade over the last model we tested, back in 2018.

MB Pro 2019 2TB has - 4651 / 16712

interesting one core result 🧐
I like GB4 scores more...
 
Comment

ascender

macrumors 68040
Dec 8, 2005
3,843
1,716
For even basic users, however, I’d recommend adding $100 back onto the system price in order to upgrade to an i5. That’s the chip ours came with. The system scored 5244 and 14672 on Geekbench 4’s single and multi-core tests, respectively, presenting a marked upgrade over the last model we tested, back in 2018.

MB Pro 2019 2TB has - 4651 / 16712

interesting one core result 🧐
I like GB4 scores more...

So that seems to confirm initial view that the i5 Air looks like quite a good buy unless you really need the most powerful machine available because of your workflow?
 
Comment

imp3rator

macrumors 6502
Dec 25, 2019
402
282
Yep - 1250 eur for 1.1 i5 vs 1750 eur for 1.4 i5 (all with 256gb)... and 17% slower in multicore and 28% higher in single-core.
But sustainable load should be better in Pro... But price...
 
Comment

ctyrider

macrumors 65816
Jul 15, 2012
1,004
567
Thanks for sharing, I didn't realise so many first impressions had come out already.

I know its not really relevant if you need macOS, but the performance comparison with the new iPads is quite eye-opening.


Those are wrong numbers - Six Colors had since corrected them. See the revised Six Colors article - the Geekbench scores between Air and iPad 2018 are very close, at least for Single-Core.


geekbench-air-ipad-fixed-6c.png
 
Comment

kp98077

macrumors 68000
Oct 26, 2010
1,653
622
I started out with the baseline 2020 air then upgraded for the quad core i5 version, any reason why the screen and colors would look so much better on this unit??
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.