Much slower is relative, those speeds are still incredibly fast, a large majority of users won't even be able to tell the difference in those speeds with SSD's.Just finished indexing on i7/16/1TB machine. The SSD is slightly faster I think than smaller models (usually is)View attachment 906062,
but still much slower than my MBP 16
Exactly. SSD speeds have gotten to the point where it’s hard to tell the difference between a “slow” SSD and a fast one in everyday usage.I guess its possible too that the T2 chip is doing alot of operations behind the scenes in the first days you start to use the
Much slower is relative, those speeds are still incredibly fast, a large majority of users won't even be able to tell the difference in those speeds with SSD's.
Be as that may, we're still paying top dollar for these machines. Their SSD's should at least come close to NVME 1TB SSD speeds that are 2500-3000 Mb/s that routinely sell for $100 on sale. The speed difference is notable when off loading GBs of data to TB3 SSD, which is noticeable for me. It wasn't that long ago when MBA's SSDs were on par with MBP's...Much slower is relative, those speeds are still incredibly fast, a large majority of users won't even be able to tell the difference in those speeds with SSD's.
The one thing I can't help you or anyone else with is the battery life. That's something I would ordinary be able to tell you. But living here in Manhattan, I won't be taking the machine out of the apartment at least until the middle of June. I am just not paying attention to it. I've heard it only gets the advertised number of hours using Apple programs. But we'll hear more about this soon.
Though that was more because SATA was the limiting factor, and then NAND speeds. Now NAND and NVME allow for more differentiation. QLC is cheaper but slower for higher capacities than TLC, for instance.Be as that may, we're still paying top dollar for these machines. Their SSD's should at least come close to NVME 1TB SSD speeds that are 2500-3000 Mb/s that routinely sell for $100 on sale. The speed difference is notable when off loading GBs of data to TB3 SSD, which is noticeable for me. It wasn't that long ago when MBA's SSDs were on par with MBP's...
.4, the latest unfortunately.Are you on 10.15.3 or .4?
.4, the latest unfortunately.
After 24 hours since receiving it I'm still not sure if going to keep it
Pros: lightweight spiritual successor to my 2016 M5 MacBook 12 which was getting long on the tooth, quad core allows me to still surf the net while Lightroom is batch processing 45megapixel DSLR RAW files (MB 12 would struggle and significantly slow down), finally 2 ports!!, BUH BYE buttercrap keyboard!!, No Touch Bar, slope shape much easier to type on than my MBP 16, battery life is decent
speakers are much better than MB 12-of course not as good as MBP 16-IMHO best MBP speakers
Cons: SSD still significantly slower than MBP modes, but much faster than my MB 12, battery life is just ok, much bigger and heavier than MB 12, obviously much louder than my fanless MB 12 (but it's less annoying fan noise)
screen washed out with less contrast than MBP 16 screen and noticeably dimmer
I'm still on the fence as I would prefer brighter screen with faster SSD of the pro and of course can never have enough CPU when processing large RAW files. It's also not much lighter than the MBP 13. Then again if it goes to 14" it will likely gain weight also
Going to run some Cinebench later for the i7 to compare...
I guess my shock when I read these reviews with temperature isn’t due to 100° readings, it’s because my 2014 MBP 13” very rarely gets above 41-43°. I’m guessing that when I get the air, I’ll find the same thing
+++ : the computer is very nice, light, finition perfect, very nice keyboard (better than my actual one), nice display luminous enough
--- : gets too hot very quickly, throttles very often, Slow SSD, lesser performance than my MBP (normal !) I expected a smaller difference, fan blows too often
Result : th MBA is into the box, and UPS picks it tomorrow. I Stay with my old MBP R
I can't say that the MBA is a bad Macbook, but not enough powerful for me to replace a 3,5 years old MBP as I expected.
It can be a very nice computer for a student or a "light" user, who won't need a powerhouse or a large display, and a very portable computer
I meant to compare against the i5 model of the 2020 MBA. The reason I'm comparing between the MBA 2020 and the MBP 16 is I want a "mini 16" as the 16 is not a good companion for air travel. I was using the MB 12 for travel and it's barely adequate for my heavy Lightroom use. The MBP 13/14 might be the better machine for me. Hence why I'm waffling on returning it...I don't think its fair to pit the Air against the 16" much bigger footprint and price. you can buy 2.4x base MacBook airs, for a 16"
What’s weird is that 10.15.4 was a disaster on my now sold 2019 MacBook Pro and my in-the-shop 12” MacBook but has been OK (fingers crossed) on my 2020 MacBook Air.Ah dang - I’ve only had one graphical glitch with safari on the screen and one out of tons of wake from sleeps that wasn’t responsive and required a reboot in a week of use
smooth sailing overall with i5 upgraded base, 10.5.3
I was expecting many more gripes from what I’ve heard about Catalina but this is the first and only build Catalina I have tried. My other MacBook Pro is on the last Sierra build
If you want a mini 16” I’d wait for the 13” Pro update. The base 13” Pro is considerably faster than the 2020 i7 Air.I meant to compare against the i5 model of the 2020 MBA. The reason I'm comparing between the MBA 2020 and the MBP 16 is I want a "mini 16" as the 16 is not a good companion for air travel. I was using the MB 12 for travel and it's barely adequate for my heavy Lightroom use. The MBP 13/14 might be the better machine for me. Hence why I'm waffling on returning it...
Hi all. I have the base MBP 2015 w/ 8gb RAM, 128gb SSD, and 5th gen i5 2.7 GHz. I have my eyes on the MBA 2020 to replace my MBP. My needs will be mainly for school work (research, papers, presentations), Tableau, Excel, emails, web browsing, social media, streaming videos, playing music, and other basic stuff.
My current Pro has served its purpose and has seen its fair share of issues like 2 screen replacements, IO port replacements, a battery replacement, etc.
I was looking at the 16gb RAM, 256gb SSD, i5 quad core model for $1179 w/ a student discount. My main concerns are future proofing, battery life, and thermals.
I am into the ecosystem with an iPhone, Apple Watch, and iPad. However, I am also looking at Windows options like the Surface Laptop 3 (base, for $899), Dell XPS, or HP Spectre. With Windows, I would opt to go for more modest specs like my current MBP and get a touchscreen enabled device to save some $ over the staggering prices ($1500) Microsoft would want for a similarly spec'd MBA I am looking at.
Could you please advise me if the MBA 2020 is the best option for me at the spec line? Or should I just do a base at $899? I really think the $1179 is a wiser investment long-term, but that's just my initial thoughts. Thanks.
I think for all these things i3 base would be good but if you want some kind of upgrade, split down the middle with your dilemma and get the i5 upgrade for overhead. with edu it brings you right back to $999 price point.
pretty sure the MBA would be competent enough for all the casual tasks you listed in general
What about going i3/16gb RAM over the i5/8gb RAM combo? With more RAM, does that help the battery life at all since the computer has to work less to keep more things going?
ive seen some people go with that config not a bad idea either, but for me I valued the $100 i5 upgrade over the $200 ram upgrade for my uses. 8gb was never an issue.
16gb is nice overhead. but I wanted to break the quad core threshold, and lots of apples use multi core. so double performance is worth it for me, even on paper.
faster ram speed should help significantly too
Given the discount, I’d go for the i5 and 16GB.Hi all. I have the base MBP 2015 w/ 8gb RAM, 128gb SSD, and 5th gen i5 2.7 GHz. I have my eyes on the MBA 2020 to replace my MBP. My needs will be mainly for school work (research, papers, presentations), Tableau, Excel, emails, web browsing, social media, streaming videos, playing music, and other basic stuff.
My current Pro has served its purpose and has seen its fair share of issues like 2 screen replacements, IO port replacements, a battery replacement, etc.
I was looking at the 16gb RAM, 256gb SSD, i5 quad core model for $1179 w/ a student discount. My main concerns are future proofing, battery life, and thermals.
I am into the ecosystem with an iPhone, Apple Watch, and iPad. However, I am also looking at Windows options like the Surface Laptop 3 (base, for $899), Dell XPS, or HP Spectre. With Windows, I would opt to go for more modest specs like my current MBP and get a touchscreen enabled device to save some $ over the staggering prices ($1500) Microsoft would want for a similarly spec'd MBA I am looking at.
Could you please advise me if the MBA 2020 is the best option for me at the spec line? Or should I just do a base at $899? I really think the $1179 is a wiser investment long-term, but that's just my initial thoughts. Thanks.
$1179 doesn't sound bad for the i5/16gb/256gb SSD combo, right? I was going to start budgeting now and then wait till about August to possibly scoop one up w/ tax free holidays and Apple promos (free Beats or gift cards, something I can sell on eBay lol).
Given that Apple uses a certain version of the i5 in their Airs, will it be a huge difference in an upcoming Pro? I think the Pro might be too costly with the spec sheet I envision being more future proof. I regretted not getting 16gb of RAM back in 2015.
The 1.4GHz processor in the base 13”$1179 doesn't sound bad for the i5/16gb/256gb SSD combo, right? I was going to start budgeting now and then wait till about August to possibly scoop one up w/ tax free holidays and Apple promos (free Beats or gift cards, something I can sell on eBay lol).
Given that Apple uses a certain version of the i5 in their Airs, will it be a huge difference in an upcoming Pro? I think the Pro might be too costly with the spec sheet I envision being more future proof. I regretted not getting 16gb of RAM back in 2015.
The 1.4GHz processor in the base 13”
Pro for 2019 is considerably faster in sustained tasks than the i7 in the Air, and I expect the 2020 Pro to widen that lead. But since you are coming from the 2015 Pro the Air may be sufficient.