Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
EDIT, UPDATE:

Vista is compromised through Adobe Flash security hole on 3rd day (after the 3rd party app is allowed)!

Ubuntu is the final one standing.

[troll]

Saved by questionable Flash support

[/troll]

;)
 
Priceless. Roughly Drafted went from a reasonable blog a few years ago to downright nutty today.

if that is the nuttiest quote you could find, then your definition of nutty is different than mine. What Daniel does best is giving his perspective on sensational headlines. In a world where Windows has been a real world security nightmare, headlines about OS X being vulnerable is big business. If their security issues resulted in real exploits being exposed I would be all for it. If you read the posts in this thread you will see worries about viruses based on this contest results. FUD is FUD. I will predict that this "security contest" OS X vulnerability will result in roughly 1,000,000 times more exploits than last year's. I doubt I will be able to sleep as sound anymore.

I've looked around but can't see any details about the MBA setup. Is it a standard/admin account? password?
 
The quote
The easy answer is that nobody had any political reason to attack Windows at an event sponsored by Microsoft.
is nutty because first of all, the event was also sponsored is one of 19 sponsors, amongst which Juniper, Cisco, Google and Adobe (whose Flash proved to be the downfall of Vista on the third day of the contest). Note that in this second quote, Roughlydrafted conveniently left out "partially" from "partially sponsored".

And second, who cares about political reasons? $10,000 is $10,000, so unless you think Microsoft has been bribing all the other teams not to attack Vista, the easy answer is just that Safari is insecure (which I don't see why people would find surprising, as this isn't its first vulnerability).
 
whatever, tell people not to look at fact, rather than speculating the "politics" behind it, is, ridiculous, "Dan" is a obvious apple fanboy, every post he wrote, every comparison he made, all disregard the favorable data/facts of opponent,
well at least you don't exaggerate in your response....

and here I thought only Apple had fanbois.....
 
Safari has a vulnerability, which Apple should fix immediately and I have no doubts that Apple will release the fix soon.

However, the exploit requires that you visit a malicious website - so the moral of the story is, don't click on those links if and when you are not sure if the site is legit.

:rolleyes: Any site on the internet could be hacked to distribute the code.

One of these day's the arrogance of invincibility is going to cause a huge issue for Apple.
 
well at least you don't exaggerate in your response....

and here I thought only Apple had fanbois.....

surprisingly, they are not exaggerations! I myself is surprised as well.

EDIT, No, i admit I shouldn't say "every post", but I stand by "every comparison" (with non-apple products).
 
I must admit it is kinda messed up he saved the safari exploit until the competition. If I was a contestant on there, I'd be really pissed. AND they were too lazy to do a "linux exploit" they knew about?? (if true)

haha :p
 
So what exploits would have been found if this hacker wasn't allowed to use Safari?

They spent a day trying to attack and take over each machine using networked connections and failed.

That to me is good news.
 
your opinion which means less to me than anything Daniel writes on his site. Tell me how that "security contest" has any real world application other than FUD and impress us all with your knowledge.

It's not FUD if it's real and has been demonstrated.
 
So what exploits would have been found if this hacker wasn't allowed to use Safari?

They spent a day trying to attack and take over each machine using networked connections and failed.

That to me is good news.
Actually, according to reports in the Register, nobody even made an attempt on the first day. Which isn't to surprising, because the rules were so stringent (hack the machine remotely without any user interaction in the default install). Pretty much all the major systems have cleaned up their act enough (running few to no network facing services, firewires) to make this extremely difficult.

That is indeed good news, but it also means that attacks are increasingly shifting to exploits targeting applications like the browser.
 
I'm new to the Mac. How long does Apple usually take to release a fix for this kind of thing? :eek:
 
I'm new to the Mac. How long does Apple usually take to release a fix for this kind of thing? :eek:

it really depends, it can be as fast as several days, or as slow as never. A recent research shows apple patching security hole relatively slower than windows.

Good thing is that OSX is still a very small market, so even when you are exposed to the risk, not many people will try to exploit it.
 
It's not FUD if it's real and has been demonstrated.

It is FUD if what has been demonstrated results in Fear Uncertainty and Doubt out of proportion to reality. This "security contest" results headlines make it sound like you can hack a mac in 2 minutes. Is that true? No. FUD. This kind of "contest" is exactly what the FUDsters live for. A shread of truth and a mountain of baloney.
 
It is FUD if what has been demonstrated results in Fear Uncertainty and Doubt out of proportion to reality. This "security contest" results headlines make it sound like you can hack a mac in 2 minutes. Is that true? No. FUD. This kind of "contest" is exactly what the FUDsters live for. A shread of truth and a mountain of baloney.

Fact is MBA went down first, Vista second, Ubuntu never. Thats fact. What does that tell you? Let ppl think for themselves.
 
than all of the local news channels are FUD. And if they are all FUD, it has become a normality.

true that. Daniel has a followup article on this. More of his nutty comments like pointing out that the Vista machine has SP1. Funny. My Windows Update fails to show this important update.
 
true that. Daniel has a followup article on this. More of his nutty comments like pointing out that the Vista machine has SP1. Funny. My Windows Update fails to show this important update.

Yes, just like how I don't have Mac OS X 10.5.3. How odd!

Don't be stupid. Large businesses, IT shops, and developers get the goodies long before they're distributed for public consumption. Vista SP1 has been floating around for quite a long time, your google powers are laughable since clearly you missed the top search result for "Vista SP1" in which they announce a release candidate in the first week of December.

I'm sure Danny boy is insinuating that Microsoft released top secret technology to prevent them from getting hacked at the event while conveniently forgetting a large Apple Security Update that just so happened to be released a week before the contest.

Everyone needs to stop drinking all the Kool-Aid and getting bent out of shape when Apple gets put to task for their slow patching of open source software that they bundle with the OS, as well as some of the security problems that are of their own making through popular software such as Quicktime, WebKit, and iTunes. Don't build market leading software, then whine about it when people find problems with your products. You should all be happy that it's one less bug that's on the market, and it's going to motivate Apple to start taking this security business seriously.

Until recently, Apple wouldn't talk to anyone about anything when it came to security. As a result, we've all suffered. Everyone who has a Pre-Leopard OS X release is vulnerable to a nasty privilege escalation issue that Apple has no intent on fixing, even though it's a small adjustment in the BOM Archive that handles the correct permissions setting on the vulnerable binaries.
 
Yes, just like how I don't have Mac OS X 10.5.3. How odd!
Don't be stupid.

I will try not to be stupid but Google doesn't have anything to do with Windows Update. For a contest testing security I find it odd that they use SP1 which is an optional download at this point that doesn't even show up for someone actively clicking their Windows Update icon. I have SP1 on both of my Vista machines because I surfed to microsoft.com, found the SP1 and installed it manually. As you probably know, Vista has eliminated the ability to update through IE and requires the user to use the built in Windows Update so the idea of manually installing OS updates for Vista is probably not happening often. Fortunately the contest was in one of the 5 languages currently available. What do you think the penetration of this SP is at this point? 1% of Vista machines at most? I don't know if SP1 makes any difference, but it sure isn't a realistic example of the vast majority of Vista machines out there. And as far as IT departments go, you must be kidding. IT is generally the last adopt a Microsoft SP until they test to make sure it doesn't cause them more problems than it fixes. And they sure aren't installing SP1 before it is officially pushed by Microsoft.

As far as patching open source holes goes, great. But this whole contest is a joke that should be a wikipedia footnote instead of the Mac hacked in 2 minutes headline.
 
joke isn't defined by fanboys like roughlydrafted, why its so hard to admit the defects? its not like apple is perfect anyway.

Apple makes benchmarks and statements more "joke-able" all the time, never seen roughlydrafted jump on any of them.

You can argue the hackers prepare more than 2 minutes. sure, obviously nobody gonna dispute that. But hackers also prepare for vista and ubuntu more than 2 days.

The real fact: Mac went down first, and at a relatively low level. That, is NOT a joke for end-users, if any of those fanboys at roughtlydrafted would like to think more for the users instead of apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.