EDIT, UPDATE:
Vista is compromised through Adobe Flash security hole on 3rd day (after the 3rd party app is allowed)!
Ubuntu is the final one standing.
[troll]
Saved by questionable Flash support
[/troll]
EDIT, UPDATE:
Vista is compromised through Adobe Flash security hole on 3rd day (after the 3rd party app is allowed)!
Ubuntu is the final one standing.
Priceless. Roughly Drafted went from a reasonable blog a few years ago to downright nutty today.
is nutty because first of all, the event was also sponsored is one of 19 sponsors, amongst which Juniper, Cisco, Google and Adobe (whose Flash proved to be the downfall of Vista on the third day of the contest). Note that in this second quote, Roughlydrafted conveniently left out "partially" from "partially sponsored".The easy answer is that nobody had any political reason to attack Windows at an event sponsored by Microsoft.
well at least you don't exaggerate in your response....whatever, tell people not to look at fact, rather than speculating the "politics" behind it, is, ridiculous, "Dan" is a obvious apple fanboy, every post he wrote, every comparison he made, all disregard the favorable data/facts of opponent,
Safari has a vulnerability, which Apple should fix immediately and I have no doubts that Apple will release the fix soon.
However, the exploit requires that you visit a malicious website - so the moral of the story is, don't click on those links if and when you are not sure if the site is legit.
well at least you don't exaggerate in your response....
and here I thought only Apple had fanbois.....
your opinion which means less to me than anything Daniel writes on his site. Tell me how that "security contest" has any real world application other than FUD and impress us all with your knowledge.
Actually, according to reports in the Register, nobody even made an attempt on the first day. Which isn't to surprising, because the rules were so stringent (hack the machine remotely without any user interaction in the default install). Pretty much all the major systems have cleaned up their act enough (running few to no network facing services, firewires) to make this extremely difficult.So what exploits would have been found if this hacker wasn't allowed to use Safari?
They spent a day trying to attack and take over each machine using networked connections and failed.
That to me is good news.
I'm new to the Mac. How long does Apple usually take to release a fix for this kind of thing?![]()
It's not FUD if it's real and has been demonstrated.
It is FUD if what has been demonstrated results in Fear Uncertainty and Doubt out of proportion to reality. This "security contest" results headlines make it sound like you can hack a mac in 2 minutes. Is that true? No. FUD. This kind of "contest" is exactly what the FUDsters live for. A shread of truth and a mountain of baloney.
It is FUD if what has been demonstrated results in Fear Uncertainty and Doubt out of proportion to reality..
than all of the local news channels are FUD. And if they are all FUD, it has become a normality.
And required access to the source code. Way to go, open source! (Puts flame retardant Nomex gear on...)Preparing the exploit actually took three weeks, but hacked in 2 minutes makes a better headline.
true that. Daniel has a followup article on this. More of his nutty comments like pointing out that the Vista machine has SP1. Funny. My Windows Update fails to show this important update.
Yes, just like how I don't have Mac OS X 10.5.3. How odd!
Don't be stupid.