I have been down that rabbit hole...
Yes, if you really need touch and a pencil, I fully agree. I guess I never did.
I was thinking, if I were a student and really needed to annotate notes then an iPad or Surface or other touch device would be perfect but it is a particular use case.
The Apple pencil is great for making quick sketches. For note taking, I mostly prefer physical pen and paper (and OCR or scanning then works quite well if you need to upload), and I have a glass whiteboard for working out ideas. The iPad note taking experience is a bit awkward for me (changing pen colour can be a pain, for example; the pencil feels a bit imprecise; and the iPad is too small for some uses and doesn't work well in really bright light) so I don't use it as much as I'd expected. I have tried to use the iPad for remote collaboration apps, but you often get some lag from those and the resolution is usually poor, so the experience can be a bit frustrating! We generally resort to drawing on paper and then sharing.
Lidar and that. Mmm maybe although I never found much use for that either.
Lidar is a bit niche at the moment. It will be interesting for measuring distances (including mapping out 3D spaces), but it's probably most useful on smaller devices than the IPP (eg a Watch). You could imagine it being very useful for assistive living, for example, and it will be great on autonomous devices.
A camera? Well, again. If you teleconference then a maybe as the 720p is still good enough for most people but I get it.
I have an external 4K camera for recordings, but I use the built-in camera on the MBA for most calls, which is fine. For recordings I also use a studio light and microphone setup. Not sure you can run all that off the iPad
(and you would want to be able to position the camera on a tripod or mount anyway, so the internal one would not be very useful)? I have used the IPP for some teleconferencing calls, but you really need to support it on a stand to get the height and angles right.
Pro Motion? I had the Samsung S10 then got the S20 to get the Pro Motion then got the Apple 12 Pro Max which didn't have it. I suppose that kind of states what I think of Pro Motion. Nice to have but lots of things are more important.
A lot of differences such as screen quality and refresh rates are really not as important is people make out or companies make out in advertising as the human brain adapts to what you have. I really didn't care much in the end about 120Hz refresh rates. It was nice to have but if I turned it off I didn't notice most of the time.
The MBA screen quality is definitely good enough for my uses (writing, software development, work calls, browsing, slack/mail). I don't watch a lot of video content, though (I have TVs/big monitors for entertainment, and I find work-related videos generally have low information content, so I avoid them).
The big deal with the M1 is it is fast, runs cool, has an excellent screen, keyboard and trackpad and does everything the average person wants. If they want all the above you mention then they end up paying almost twice as much for an iPad Pro with keyboard that is in some ways, discussed, more limited.
Yes to this. I have both an iPad Pro and an M1 MBA - the M1 MBA is my go-to device for most things. The iPad Pro could be more useful to me if the multi-tasking was better, it had good software development tools (including a CLI), the keyboard was fully functional (the cursor key support drives me crazy!), and it had multi-user support (I don't want to accidentally show emails etc when presenting, for example; and I sometimes need to play around with different setups/configurations, or lend the machine to someone). But then you basically end up with the MBA
🙂
I forgot to say that the MBA audio is very impressive. They have somehow managed to make it three-dimensional (perhaps by using reflections off the display?)