Hate to break the news to you, but Steve Jobs wasn't an engineer.Maccbook Air was Classic Jobs. Incredible piece of engineering and design. 15 years later they still use the same wedge design in the M1 Chip Air.
Hate to break the news to you, but Steve Jobs wasn't an engineer.Maccbook Air was Classic Jobs. Incredible piece of engineering and design. 15 years later they still use the same wedge design in the M1 Chip Air.
Great. So then the Wright Brothers didn't invent the airplane.
And nobody ever invented anything, because everything is build on the work of others. If the word "invention" is supposed to mean anything, then it's credited to the last one, who puts everything together to create a new system that is more than the sum of its parts, because for the first time people could fly and steer a craft heavier-than-air independent from wind direction.
And if the Wright Brothers weren't slick marketers, who managed to sell their flyer to the U.S. Army Signal Corps as the first reconnaissance aircraft, maybe they would be forgotten today. Same goes for Carl Benz and the automobile.
Uğur Şahin and the first clinically approved mRNA vaccine. How are you even an inventor, if you don't bring a product to the market?
Who is Thomas Alva Edison, if he forgot to sell the lightbulb!
If you improve something as much that it becomes a new thing, which deserves to be categorized under a new name (smartphone versus dumbphone), then you invented the damn thing.
Nobody said Steve Jobs invented the computer itself. Konrad Zuse and a few others fight over that title. But Apple invented a few new kinds of computers.
the original one was the best. that flip-down port on the right side, was just perfect.Maccbook Air was Classic Jobs. Incredible piece of engineering and design. 15 years later they still use the same wedge design in the M1 Chip Air.
Nope. Palm themselves called their devices PDAs and they were largely unsuccessful at being the easy to use general purpose computer for everyone. Instead of being the first smartphones, PDAs were what a few crazy people had in the days of old before smartphones. They were the airships to the airplanes. And once the smartphone was invented, PDAs were completely replaced for obvious reasons.OK, the Palm has a valid claim to inventing the first usable smartphone, by our standard.
I had a 2014 with 4 GB of RAM until last year. It was definitely still useable with Big Sur installed. Not a powerhouse, of course, but compared to a Windows laptop running Windows 10 with o lot 4 GB, I’d take the MBA.I've never owned an original, but I've got a couple late 2008s and a 2009 which kept the same design but had the major benefit of 9400M graphics. A couple of them had the memory failure, but I do have a 1.8GHz booting Mojave and just for giggles installed Big Sur on my 1.6 machine. Replacing the iPod HDD was a must after Yosemite, but I really do think that if they had 4GB or more RAM, Big Sur and Monterey could be passable on them. That 2GB RAM really hurts badly.
Hate to break the news to you, but Steve Jobs wasn't an engineer.
Apple definitely cares about marketing. You think their ads that pushed their products as fashion statements or the fact that they had a guy employed to literally create Apple followers into a cult had nothing to do with convincing people like you and others to all turn into this;Nobody gives a sheit about Apple marketing. Apple improved the way phone apps are used, run and installed.
PDA was the nomenclature of the time, and could still apply to today's smartphones that are essentially PDAs by another name.Nope. Palm themselves called their devices PDAs and they were largely unsuccessful at being the easy to use general purpose computer for everyone. Instead of being the first smartphones, PDAs were what a few crazy people had in the days of old before smartphones. They were the airships to the airplanes. And once the smartphone was invented, PDAs were completely replaced for obvious reasons.
Maybe that's broadly true, but Apple did invent the modern smartphone, the smartphone as we all know it today. Before 2007 I owned a few phones that were "early smartphones" and they were very cool. I especially loved the budget Sony Ericson that was a big touchscreen (big at the time anyway) and had a numpad that flipped up over the bottom of the screen and the rubber buttons pressed into the screen to dial. But Apple set the standard with the original iPhone, by having it made of glass, multitouch from day one, IPS display from day one. Unlike what Android was cooking up to be in 2007 the iPhone didn't need or want physical buttons.But to your original point, Apple did not invent the smartphone (or PC and tablet), even if they made it mainstream.
Such innovation, like the MacBook Air, that happened under Steve Jobs has never happened under that mediocre MBA suit Tim Cook. If someone cares about corporate profits and shareholders much more than innovation, then of course Cook is the best CEO that Apple ever had. But for people who care about the creation of products meant to be the most effective computing tools for the common man (i.e., not as luxury goods for the wealthy that are priced so high and with compromised functionality), then Cook is a horrible CEO.