It doesn't work that way. You pointed your finger at cooling issues with modern 13" MBPs and pointed to a different manufacturer and said they were better for 'cooling performance'. No facts, just hubris.
Fact: Modern 13" MBPs have excess cooling capacity to the extent that they can continually run their Intel CPUs over and above their rated performance levels (aka overclocking).
This topic was done to death with last year's 13" MBP 'throttlegate'. Apple choose to run their Intel CPUs in an unlocked state so the only limit applied is the thermal limit. This means that, for maximum performance, the machine will run to the physical thermal limit rather than the lower limits normally set by Intel.
If a CPU is capable of running at it's claimed base clock frequency (all core) and turbo to the claimed frequency (single core) then it is not thermally constrained by the system cooling. Any performance above this level is a bonus and a chance for the silicone lottery.
Evidence:
2018 13" MBP 2.3GHz (all cores). Actual sustained performance achieved (all cores) = 3.0GHz.
At the other end of the performance scale, same machine, just with regular productivity tasks:
To be clear, you have claimed that the 13" MBP is CPU constrained due to poor cooling. Please post your 'pretty obvious' testing you have completed on your similarly spec'ed machines that underpins your argument.