Yes, Apple does aknowledge the problem. But not what the real problem is..
A mono summed and placed to one side SUB-WOOFER is fine because Bass is mostly omni-directional.
The Problem is that the mono "sub-woofer" in the macbook pro is not a subwoofer, it is a mid range speaker with a frequency response of approx. 250-1500Hz. , though it doesn't roll completely off until about 100Hz downwards.
That leave the left speaker only with frequencies from 1500Hz and up.
For those of you that have seen a 2-way speaker:
It means that the so-called Sub-woofer actually represents what would come out of the bigger element. While the left side of the computer is left with the high frequencies that comes out on the small top speaker.
A sub-woofer would be something that started where the bigger of the 2 speakers couldn't play any lower. It would in other words be in addition to these two.
Wikipedia:
A subwoofer (or "sub") is a woofer, or a complete loudspeaker typically between 8" and 21" in diameter, which is dedicated to the reproduction of low-pitched audio frequencies (the "bass"). The typical frequency range for a subwoofer is about 20200 Hz for consumer products,[1] below 100 Hz for professional live sound,[2] and below 80 Hz in THX-approved systems.[3] Because of their limited frequency range, most subwoofers are used to augment the output of loudspeakers covering higher frequency bands.
The point with all this being that apple with it's sub-woofer talk tries to hide the fact that this computer does not have stereo. It's got a mono mid-range driver with reasonable low-mid response for being a laptop. And they have added another treble driver to give an impression of being more than mono.
It's "better" than the mono of my old macbook, but the cool-aid factor worries me.