It certainly depends on the specs of the two machines you're comparing... duhh.
If you're the portability of a MacBook Pro is a MUST HAVE requirement for you, then that is the obvious choice. Adding the 24" ACD will definitely be a plus when your'e using it at home, in that one spot that you have put the ACD.
Two monitors is always nicer than one.
I think it basically boils down to whether or not you want the portability of the laptop.
Guys... Is the 24'' 3.06ghz Imac much powerful than the 2.54-2.66 Unis?
Let me know,
JC
Personally, I use a Macbook Pro and a Samsung 24" monitor (I would steer away from the ACD as there is a about a 200-300 dollar mark up for comparable models).
I love my set up. It gives the allusion of a desktop, yet I still have duel screens + portability, which is a must if you are a student like me.
Here's a pic to give you an idea (excuse the snow background as it was taken in December)
Personally, I use a Macbook Pro and a Samsung 24" monitor (I would steer away from the ACD as there is a about a 200-300 dollar mark up for comparable models).
I love my set up. It gives the allusion of a desktop, yet I still have duel screens + portability, which is a must if you are a student like me.
Here's a pic to give you an idea (excuse the snow background as it was taken in December)
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66GHz + LED Cinema Display = 24" iMac 2.66 + an extra 15" Display & portability.
You get the best of both worlds... combined makes... Laptop & Desktop
Same speck as the iMac.
Personally, I use a Macbook Pro and a Samsung 24" monitor (I would steer away from the ACD as there is a about a 200-300 dollar mark up for comparable models).
I love my set up. It gives the allusion of a desktop, yet I still have duel screens + portability, which is a must if you are a student like me.
Here's a pic to give you an idea (excuse the snow background as it was taken in December)
Not true. The iMac offers better graphics than the MBP.
Now true... http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB418LL/A?mco=NDE4Mzg4NA
The 24" iMac has a NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics like the MacBook Pro... also with the MacBook Pro, you can switch it to NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT.
Also the iMac doesn't have the LED screen like the new ACD... it uses the same old LCD display.
Only if you don't need portability, because for the price of a MacBook Pro 15", you could get a low-end Nehalem quad-core Mac Pro instead of an iMac. The iMac uses laptop parts. If you want cheap without portability, go for the Mac Mini + 24" LED ACD.Yes the cheapest has the same intergrated card but the iMac still has better graphics with the GT130 or 4850
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66GHz + 24" LED Cinema Display = 24" iMac 2.66GHz + an extra 15" Display for portability.
You get the best of both worlds... combined makes... Laptop & Desktop
Same speck as the iMac.
![]()
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66GHz + 24" LED Cinema Display = 24" iMac 2.66GHz + an extra 15" Display for portability.
You get the best of both worlds... combined makes... Laptop & Desktop
Same speck as the iMac.
![]()
Where in the world did you get the cool MacBook and iPod stands?! I just bought a refurb 24" iMac, and would love the iPod stand...
I also have a Samsung display, but your info is false as stated in two other previous posts. First, the ACD has a H-IPS panel. These panels are excellent in terms of color accuracy. That might not mean much to you, but for graphic design and print, it's important for the screen to match what prints out. Second, it's LED backlit whereas most displays are CCFL. LED is brighter, power efficient, and thinner. You also pay for the glass, aluminum design, and power adapter for Macs.