Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Macbook Pro 16 almost as powerful as a Mac Pro?
- Thread starter rueyloon
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The new 16 inch MBP is sn extremely powerful computer and considering its s laptop, totally stunning performance.
As for as powerful as a MP I’d say yes and no.
Currently it seems that many professional video and photography software is nowhere near optimised to take advantage of the MP’s raw power. This makes the 16inch MBP all the more competitive and in some regards better performing.
However, if (who knows when) software gets updated then this gap will widen significantly.
As for as powerful as a MP I’d say yes and no.
Currently it seems that many professional video and photography software is nowhere near optimised to take advantage of the MP’s raw power. This makes the 16inch MBP all the more competitive and in some regards better performing.
However, if (who knows when) software gets updated then this gap will widen significantly.
You're comparing two wildly different pieces of hardware and setting them against each other with the question, "does this mean the 16" Macbook Pro is almost as powerful as a Mac Pro?". One is a machine whose hardware is locked into place once you've configured it, and the other is an open ended machine where everything save the T2 security chip locked SSD boot drive can be upgraded.
So, does the Macbook Pro 16" beat the crap out of the Mac Pro in terms of portability? Yep!
Does the Mac Pro beat the snot out of the Macbook Pro 16" when you need to upgrade a component? Obviously.
Does the base configuration Mac Pro compare favorably to the 16" Macbook Pro's base configuration? No.
They are both very good at what they're intended for, and you cannot rightly compare the two because they are different classes of computer. Good grief.
So, does the Macbook Pro 16" beat the crap out of the Mac Pro in terms of portability? Yep!
Does the Mac Pro beat the snot out of the Macbook Pro 16" when you need to upgrade a component? Obviously.
Does the base configuration Mac Pro compare favorably to the 16" Macbook Pro's base configuration? No.
They are both very good at what they're intended for, and you cannot rightly compare the two because they are different classes of computer. Good grief.
Define "powerful".
A single-threaded job that only used a few GB of RAM and doesn't use the GPU will likely run slower on a $20,000 Mac Pro than a $1,200 Mac Mini.
On the other hand, a job that makes good use of multithreading can light up all 24-28 cores of the Mac Pro and run several times faster than on an 6 or 8-core machine.
The Mac Pro offers the potential for more cores, more RAM and multiple/more powerful GPUs, as well as the ability to run for longer periods without thermal throttling or RAM glitches. However, before paying Mac Pro money, you need to make very sure that your workflow needs/uses those resources.
Or, to put it another way, a Ferrari will take longer to get you across town than a Kia.
You are right, I left out the information that I mainly work in lightroom and FCPX. In the review video, the lightroom performance seems to be very close to the 2019 Macpro. If I do get the MBP, it will mainly end up being used as a CPU as I seldom work on site. the 2019 Macpro would be great, but when I upgraded from the 2009 Macpro to the 2014 Macpro the experience was underwhelming as the performance gain was about 20%-25%. I did many so test as I was expecting more for the price I paid then.
There’s no reason to get a Mac Pro if you’re not going to be using apps that take advantage of it.
The max'd MBP16,1 has performed better than the entry/base iMacPro for video-specific tasks in internal testing, including hardware encode. Going to two-pass encodes and the difference was minimal (slight edge to MBP16,1). This is likely due to i9 vs. Xeon. Almost easily MBP16,1 outperforms max'd MP5,1 in most tasks.
The MP7,1 entry model might benchmark close to the iMacPro base, but it really is not. Believe base iMacPro is 3.2 GHz 8-Core Xeon W-2140B and MP7,1 is 3.5 GHz 8-Core Xeon W-3223. Upgraded model tiers is a different comparison.
Have seen benchmarks of MBP16,1 at or equal to MP7,1 performance but there is absolutely no way that would be sustainable for weeks/months/years of operation. I really like the hardware of the MBP16,1 and glad I purchased mine to replace an aging MBP, but it's not a desktop workstation. Cannot even pretend it is for more than a few days.
The MP7,1 entry model might benchmark close to the iMacPro base, but it really is not. Believe base iMacPro is 3.2 GHz 8-Core Xeon W-2140B and MP7,1 is 3.5 GHz 8-Core Xeon W-3223. Upgraded model tiers is a different comparison.
Have seen benchmarks of MBP16,1 at or equal to MP7,1 performance but there is absolutely no way that would be sustainable for weeks/months/years of operation. I really like the hardware of the MBP16,1 and glad I purchased mine to replace an aging MBP, but it's not a desktop workstation. Cannot even pretend it is for more than a few days.