Hi,
I was reading the reviews of Macbook pro retina display 2,3 ghz.From the review http://http://www.pcworld.com/product/1218250/apple_15inch_macbook_pro_with_retina_display23ghz_core_i7_mid_2012.html%3Fp=review of PC World I was completely stunned by the difference.However when It comes to chart table of the official apple store site things get a little bit confusing
It will be my very first macbook and I want to buy the one that is better,from the graphics retina seems perfectly fine.While looking to my computer which I have for 4 years,I totally used 109 gb /213 gb and I am not a professional just a regular teen who loves playing games.I do not like war games but like The Sims 3 and Civ like games.
I want to use this computer as much as I can,at least how many years a retina can work smoothly (not perfectly but just in a sense no problems) and a 2,6 ghz ?
I must admit that I like the retina display version,seems to be more impressive and attractive.
Any comments would be appreciated
Regards
I was reading the reviews of Macbook pro retina display 2,3 ghz.From the review http://http://www.pcworld.com/product/1218250/apple_15inch_macbook_pro_with_retina_display23ghz_core_i7_mid_2012.html%3Fp=review of PC World I was completely stunned by the difference.However when It comes to chart table of the official apple store site things get a little bit confusing
It will be my very first macbook and I want to buy the one that is better,from the graphics retina seems perfectly fine.While looking to my computer which I have for 4 years,I totally used 109 gb /213 gb and I am not a professional just a regular teen who loves playing games.I do not like war games but like The Sims 3 and Civ like games.
I want to use this computer as much as I can,at least how many years a retina can work smoothly (not perfectly but just in a sense no problems) and a 2,6 ghz ?
I must admit that I like the retina display version,seems to be more impressive and attractive.
Any comments would be appreciated
Regards