Being able to see lines of code is something highly underrated by people who don't code.
truism much?
Being able to see lines of code is something highly underrated by people who don't code.
kickAss, this is where an external monitor is a godsend, and something to consider getting. 23" for under $100, according to Best Buy. Being able to see an extra 10 lines of code on your screen (and without having your nose pressed up to the screen to see it) is something highly underrated by people who don't code.
truism much?![]()
If he intends to work in multiple locations (lab, library, cafeteria, etc.), he's not going to lug a monitor around. If he stays in one spot, might as well get a desktop.
Just a touch.
True, but I guess I'm taking it for granted that you can take your laptop and code wherever you want. In my day (showing my age now), a top of the range laptop was something like 66MHz and cost two months salary. The idea of being able to code wherever you want is great, but I still like to plug in a big monitor for the real estate and to save my eyes.
Instead of spending the money on an external monitor, he could just put that money into a laptop with retina display that has a resolution that is equal to a 27" monitor or larger.
It's better to go demo the units in store and see which one fits best.
For coding, the only thing that beats a big screen is a bigger screen.
Suggesting that retina enables you to have the option to choose the best from both worlds is simply misleading. Imagine the 2560x1440 of a 27" packed on a 3.5" device ... extreme example, granted, but this is pretty much what you suggest doing with a retina display (to a lesser extent).
256GB is a must if you intend to
.