I think users understand better fundamental concepts if we translate them to “image quality“:DOSMix external DAC delivers 32bit @ 192Khz which is silly, that's a dynamic range to go from a pin drop to a bomb drop and a high end that only instruments can measure but, yeah, would love to hear someones take on audio quality at $22.
![]()
DOSMIX USB C DAC - Portable 32 Bit/384kHz Dosmix Headphone Amplifier, HiFi Converter, Qualcomm chipset, Impedance 600Ω, SNR123dB, Premium Sound Enhancer for Android/Windows Smartphone Laptop
DOSMIX USB C DAC - Portable 32 Bit/384kHz Dosmix Headphone Amplifier, HiFi Converter, Qualcomm chipset, Impedance 600Ω, SNR123dB, Premium Sound Enhancer for Android/Windows Smartphone Laptopwww.amazon.com
- Resolution is going up to 8K in tv sets, Apple retina screens are wonderful… and desired top resolution should be the closest to analogue original. I presume this is commonly assumed, but nevertheless hi-res digital sound seems an eccentricity…
It isn’t superfluous to work with highest sound (or image) resolution because of “production“, mixing, arranging… When filters, effects or transformations are applied, maximum resolution is pertinent. Even if final file is downsampled.
- Quality of the image (or sound) is close related also to reproduction of color and light levels. HiRes image (on screen or printed) can be poor quality. With sound, quality of the signal (resolution apart) and quality of reproduction equipment are crucial.
I’ve experienced cheap HiRes DACs that sounded poorer than my iMac’s internal one. Apple’s offered 96kHz top is “high res” enough to appreciate quality with appropriate sound equipment.
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.