Hell no. A VM should have a core to call its own.
Could you run 2 or 3 VMs on a rmb? Would it work tolerably well?
3 Windows VMs, all running a Youtube video on my rMB: http://imgur.com/KOPR8dL
Short of pushing all the VMs to the max like that (video was running poorly after third started), 3 should run relatively ok. If using something less of a resource hog like headless Linux VMs, they'll run better as well.
Wow, that's actually very impressive.
3 Windows VMs, all running a Youtube video on my rMB: http://imgur.com/KOPR8dL
Short of pushing all the VMs to the max like that (video was running poorly after third started), 3 should run relatively ok. If using something less of a resource hog like headless Linux VMs, they'll run better as well.
Where did you get the wallpaper? I thought it was going to come with it but it didn't
so far I get contradicted result about xcode from this thread. Can anyone else comment on this?
I would like to do some iOS/andriod dev on rMB. Compiling slowness is fine since I use separate build server for that. Is opening xcode/manipulate storyboard/writing code slow too?
No it doesn't. Proper virtualisation software does not work like that. It's the hypervisor that will manage the cpu and memory side of things. What you do want is a (physical) cpu that is able to drive all your virtual machines. For some a Core Duo would suffice, for others the 12-core cpu in the Mac Pro wouldn't even cut it.Hell no. A VM should have a core to call its own.
It depends on what you would define as being slow or fast, what you are used to and what and how you're devving. Take a look at the Atlassian link someone posted here, shows you a different way of developing things.so far I get contradicted result about xcode from this thread. Can anyone else comment on this?
Just wondering whether anyone has started using the rMB for serious software development?
Is anyone using any of the following:
VMWare Fusion with Windows or Linux guests.
Eclipse
NetBeans
IntelliJ
JDeveloper
Heavy-weight Java EE servers such as WebLogic, WebSphere, JBoss
Groovy on Grails / Ruby on Rails
Oracle DB (via VM)
Is the performance adequate for your typical tasks?
Are you connecting to an external monitor?
I'm wondering whether the rMB would up to job when travelling, to replace my rMBP 15 for the "lighter jobs".
I use Xcode & IntelliJ.
I had the base macbook and just returned it. VERY NICE machine.
I am just a speed demon, impatient on build times because I need to do a lot (ADD part of me).
While I am sure the performance is "good enough" for many, just not for me. YMMV. My other mac is a 15" rMBP which smokes the rMB. I also have a 5 year old Dell T3500 Precision Workstation(Quad Xeon processors) that also smokes it.
It is a very very nice machine....
Just wondering whether anyone has started using the rMB for serious software development?
Is anyone using any of the following:
VMWare Fusion with Windows or Linux guests.
Eclipse
NetBeans
IntelliJ
JDeveloper
Heavy-weight Java EE servers such as WebLogic, WebSphere, JBoss
Groovy on Grails / Ruby on Rails
Oracle DB (via VM)
Is the performance adequate for your typical tasks?
Are you connecting to an external monitor?
I'm wondering whether the rMB would up to job when travelling, to replace my rMBP 15 for the "lighter jobs".
I'm doing ROR and php development on it. No problems at all with speed. MAMP and mongodb running at all times. Xcode and Android studio loaded but no real uses yet. Adobe Illustrator used for graphics. All run fine. Parallels + Win 10.
Ruby tests only marginally slower than my rMBP.
Everything is sugar synced between the rMB and rMBP. I could do some comparisons if that would be helpful.
I am not fully used to the keyboard yet. I do miss keys presses more often that I would like.
I'm the developer of this app:
http://www.livingearthapp.com
There's a decent amount of code there. On my 2012 maxed out Retina Macbook Pro a clean build with Xcode takes 30 seconds. On my 1.3ghz Retina Macbook I got today, it takes 1m 30s. So about three times longer.
Bearable since I don't do clean builds often. It's my travel machine and is going to be great for that but not as a primary development machine for what I do.
That sounds like a huge difference that I haven't observed. Sounds like the rMBP may have the project cached and the rMB did not. Maybe try them both after a reboot.
I've seen much smaller differences in compile time even compared to a maxed out 3.1ghz 2015 rMBP.
Running VMs in external storage can be a mess in the nMB. In this case, the best option is getting the 512GB one.
I'm a web designer and developer. Purchased the 1.1GHz base model. So far, without a hitch, I've used:
- Terminal for SSH / Git
- GitHub
- Coda
- Sublime Text
- CodeKit
- All Major Browsers
- iA Writer
- OmmWriter
- Private Internet Access
- VLC
- Transmission
- Photoshop / Creative Cloud