So, I'm reading reviews on my Macbook Pro cause I'm excited (I just ordered one). And I am reading this one site who gives a very good review of the Macbook Pro (making me more excited) and I got curious and read their review of the new macbook. Here is the link to the page that has me baffled in the Macbook review: http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/apple-macbook-2010.aspx?page=2 Well, according to them, the Macbook tests slightly faster and slightly better graphics than the Pro. I'm very confused how that can be seeing they are both running the same processor and same graphics card (and in fact the Pro has more RAM). Would this be a varience in test or what would affect this? I would think the RAM difference would overcome any small variences between tests. Anyways, I'm all hyped up cause the new computer from what I read is going to be what I wished my Macbook was, a good computer overall for basic word and internet plus some gaming ability (I loved my Macbook but even new it was not very good for gaming. Couldn't even run the current sim City at the time very well). And honestly I've loved the newer trackpad design, the black border around the screen, the light up keyboard, and the slim metal case much more over my white plastic (if it wasn't a tax and more expensive to get the black one I would have wanted that one. White is not a good color for a computer, especially for framing a display (screen) with).