MacDailyNews says "boycott Samsung"

smoledman

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Oct 17, 2011
1,912
309
http://macdailynews.com/?s=boycott+samsung&submit_button=Search

MacDailyNews Take: As we’ve been saying since 2008, Samsung certainly has no shame.

Boycott Samsung. We no longer buy Samsung-branded products and advise our millions of readers worldwide to also avoid purchasing Samsung-branded products until they cease stealing Apple’s patented IP.
So since Samsung has been proven to have been serially copying Apple's designs for the iPhone and iPad, isn't it a moral imperative to boycott the IP thief?
 
Last edited:

Peace

macrumors Core
Apr 1, 2005
19,516
3,989
Space--The ONLY Frontier
Well if you're going to boycott Samsung better throw away or sell that iPhone or iPad or Macbook Air or any memory in your systems that have samsung memory.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,400
12,410
Sorry, my eyes teared up from laughing so hard after them stating they have millions of readers.
 

01jamcon

macrumors 6502a
Jul 24, 2006
511
0
London
http://macdailynews.com/?s=boycott+samsung&submit_button=Search



So since Apple has been proven to have been serially copying Apple's designs for the iPhone and iPad, isn't it a moral imperative to boycott the IP thief?
Wait what? Apple is copying Apple's designs? hmm

And in answer to your question, no its not morally imperative to boycott Samsung, poor little Apple has billions of dollars and plenty of lawyers who will eventually sort out any IP theft problems without some silly website telling its readers what to do. People can think for themselves.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
I doubt most consumers will care enough to boycott any tech company over patent disputes.
 

smoledman

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Oct 17, 2011
1,912
309
Wait what? Apple is copying Apple's designs? hmm

And in answer to your question, no its not morally imperative to boycott Samsung, poor little Apple has billions of dollars and plenty of lawyers who will eventually sort out any IP theft problems without some silly website telling its readers what to do. People can think for themselves.
It makes no difference how much money Apple has. IP theft is a moral issues. Even if Apple had a $1 trillion in cash, Samsung the IP thief should be given the corporate death penalty.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,166
580
Finland
Well if you're going to boycott Samsung better throw away or sell that iPhone or iPad or Macbook Air or any memory in your systems that have samsung memory.
Ditto. iPhone uses Samsung NAND and DRAM and Apple's SoCs are manufactured by Samsung. It's hard to find a tech gadget without any Samsung hardware in it.
 

01jamcon

macrumors 6502a
Jul 24, 2006
511
0
London
It makes no difference how much money Apple has. IP theft is a moral issues. Even if Apple had a $1 trillion in cash, Samsung the IP thief should be given the corporate death penalty.
Can you not see the contradiction you just made?

First you say it has nothing to do with money and is all about morals.

Then you say because its a moral issue, we should all punish Samsung financially.

How about you and this Mac Daily News site stop trying to infiltrate peoples minds, let them read about the facts of the case and decide where they want to spend their hard earned money for themselves.
 

smoledman

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Oct 17, 2011
1,912
309
Ditto. iPhone uses Samsung NAND and DRAM and Apple's SoCs are manufactured by Samsung. It's hard to find a tech gadget without any Samsung hardware in it.
Soon enough Apple will design their own NAND & DRAM and be 100% free of Samsung. That's what the purchase of Anobit was about. Apple will do 100% of their own component designs for mobile devices by 2015-2016 and 100% of component design for Macbooks by 2018. They will remain fab-less, but by eliminating the middle-man component designer that will increase their control and profits.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,400
12,410
Soon enough Apple will design their own NAND & DRAM and be 100% free of Samsung. That's what the purchase of Anobit was about. Apple will do 100% of their own component designs for mobile devices by 2015-2016 and 100% of component design for Macbooks by 2018. They will remain fab-less, but by eliminating the middle-man component designer that will increase their control and profits.

And who but Samsung can manufacture in quantities needed by Apple?
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
Soon enough Apple will design their own NAND & DRAM and be 100% free of Samsung. That's what the purchase of Anobit was about. Apple will do 100% of their own component designs for mobile devices by 2015-2016 and 100% of component design for Macbooks by 2018. They will remain fab-less, but by eliminating the middle-man component designer that will increase their control and profits.
This is more or less the direction in which the wind is blowing for Apple. Excellent point.

And who but Samsung can manufacture in quantities needed by Apple?
For now, that's the issue.
 
Last edited:

boss.king

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2009
3,240
56
I doubt most consumers will care enough to boycott any tech company over patent disputes.
That's a point I can agree with you on. Consumers don't care about the legal issues, they just want the products.
 

smoledman

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Oct 17, 2011
1,912
309
That's a point I can agree with you on. Consumers don't care about the legal issues, they just want the products.
That's not true, more people then you think do *care* about the morals of the corporations they are buying from. Especially the millennial, they are very radical and activist these days and demand 100% purity.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
That's not true, more people then you think do *care* about the morals of the corporations they are buying from. Especially the millennial, they are very radical and activist these days and demand 100% purity.
Then they seem to have forgotten about Samsung (and depending on your perspective, Apple.)

I'm not saying what Samsung is doing is right, but that doesn't seem to be relevant. From their current numbers, it is clear that the exact opposite of a boycott is happening.

The mass market simply isn't interested enough, much less informed enough, to care about these things. You and I probably do, but we hardly reflect Joe Consumer.

Now if you're submitting that the bulk of the market is getting more conscious and concerned about these things, that's possible (I think unlikely), but it is yet to happen and actually bear noticeable fruit.
 

boss.king

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2009
3,240
56
That's not true, more people then you think do *care* about the morals of the corporations they are buying from. Especially the millennial, they are very radical and activist these days and demand 100% purity.
Well I have to say, I've never met or even heard of anyone who has boycotted a company based on the companies patent disputes
 

jaynone

macrumors member
Jan 2, 2012
63
0
I already boycott Samsung phones and TVs :apple:
Agreed. I have to deal with a few samsung tv's at work and I'd rather stick a needle in my eye than have to tear them apart to figure out what the hell is wrong with them.... constantly...
 

AppleScruff1

macrumors G4
Feb 10, 2011
10,026
2,871
Agreed. I have to deal with a few samsung tv's at work and I'd rather stick a needle in my eye than have to tear them apart to figure out what the hell is wrong with them.... constantly...
What brand of tv do you find to be the best? Sony?
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,785
211
UK
I don't think I actually own anything that is Samsung. Except the insides of my iPhone. I support MacDailyNews are throwing out all their iOS devices right now.

EDIT: Ah, Samsung's involvement in the iOS devices has already been mentioned.
 

boss.king

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2009
3,240
56
Agreed. I have to deal with a few samsung tv's at work and I'd rather stick a needle in my eye than have to tear them apart to figure out what the hell is wrong with them.... constantly...
I'm surprised to hear that. I've had Samsung monitors and TVs (both old and recent) and I've only ever had 1 faulty monitor which they replaced and a TV die as a result of a lightning strike. I always thought Samsung was one of the better companies for displays.
 

steve2112

macrumors 68040
Feb 20, 2009
3,023
6
East of Lyra, Northwest of Pegasus
I'm surprised to hear that. I've had Samsung monitors and TVs (both old and recent) and I've only ever had 1 faulty monitor which they replaced and a TV die as a result of a lightning strike. I always thought Samsung was one of the better companies for displays.
It seems lots of people agree with you, as Samsung was the best selling TV brand in the US in 2011. That article is dealing with the first half of the year. I haven't seen anything for the second half. I find it interesting, as Vizio was #1 a couple of years ago.
 

Stella

macrumors G3
Apr 21, 2003
8,322
4,778
Canada
Last edited: