Hello there, About 2 motnhs ago I bought an iMac 27" 2011 (not refubrished) It's an amazing computer, now I want to get a laptop, this time a refubrished one so I can save some cash. I found this two that interest me the most: Refurbished MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Quad-core Intel i7 Originally released October 2011 15.4-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit Hi-Res antiglare widescreen display, 1680-by-1050 resolution 4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM 500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm 8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M OR: Refurbished MacBook Pro 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 Originally released April 2010 15.4-inch LED-backlit antiglare Hi-Res widescreen display (1680 x 1050 pixel) 4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM 500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm 8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory Both are the same exact price, which one do you think its better? I'd like to plug it to my imac so I can use it as an external monitor, is that possible with the 2010 on? (with the lack of thunderbolt), Graphics seems pretty obvious that the 2011 is better, but how about the processor? the 2010 has a 2.8 vs a 2.2. Oh and what do you think of the 17"? is it too big? the resolution is quite amazing and its just about +$60. Any thoughts are welcome. Thanks.