A two-year cycle won't help. It's really just Apple's software team. You can get macOS on a 3-year cycle and it'll just be as bad because Safari is on its own schedule and is still pretty shoddy.I hate to say, but Apple’s software side has been growling more and more unreliable. I bought a new Mac Studio that came with Ventura, but SMB file serving was completely broken in Ventura, and none of the fixes online worked for me, so I had to downgrade to Monterey. Monterey has been buggy at best. The main reason I bought this computer was that I needed something more reliable than my 2010 Mac Pro.
I’ve really lost all trust in Apple’s reliability on the software side of things. They’re now making great hardware, but subpar software. Maybe if they can stop rushing out major OSes every year, they may have a chance. I think macOS would do well on a two-year cycle. iOS would do well on a two year cycle too, but I don’t think that’ll ever happen in the foreseeable future. Apple is being driven by marketing hype above all else, and no longer by what’s best for end-users.
I stayed on Big Sur for this very reason.
Tim Cook was good for Apple for a while but at age 62, he's lost the vigour that he once had as COO. The average age of CEOs at FAANG is around 50 years old. You have to remember that Steve Jobs was only 56 when he died and was around 50 when he conceived of the iPhone. Apple needs to be reinvigorated and the current trio of Tim Cook, Craig Federighi, and Jeff Williams just won't do.
I'm hoping for a management reshuffle before they start doing real damage to the Apple brand.
Last edited: