Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macOS 15 Rumored to Support Same Macs as macOS Sonoma, With One Possible Exception

Blackstick said:
Don't spend too much time on any Apple silicon hardware, you'll never go back to Intel. It's like the 2006 PowerPC to Intel changeover. The speed and lack of heat generation will spoil you immediately.
Click to expand...

Maybe, on the other hand my 2020 iMac. maxed out with the "better" GPU and CPU, 64GB RAM and 4TB SSD does everything <i need him to do, without hearing ist most of the time. For me it would be enough, if it would get just security updates. Even my 2014 iMac is still a computer I can work with, it is a shame, that it does not get security updates. (I tried Open Core several times, but that never worked for me).

Someday I will replace the iMac with a Mac Studio and Studio Display, but when paying so much for a computer I expect it to last a long time. Especially from a company, that always states, hoe environmental friendly they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Moka Akashiya said:
Strange, I expected that they would continue to actively remove support for Intel Macs. Perhaps they reconsidered this decision and decided not to rush. However, I’m sure they will still surprise us with the number of features that will be limited only to Apple Silicon.
Click to expand...
That’s what they’re doing, it’s like a soft dropping of support. I suspect the hard drop is coming next year.
 
I bet this will be macOS Mammoth

Now, as for the compatibility, this might be the last release of macOS officially supporting Intel macs.
 
Still just waiting for a year with "Only T2" support, before Intel macOS just stops shipping... I was betting on T2 only this year:

mstdn.social

DavidSchaub (@dschaub@mstdn.social)

Attached: 1 image So only T2 Intel Macs will be supported next year? Will that be the last, or 2nd last Intel build?
mstdn.social mstdn.social

7f40d407b9232799.png


That being said, my 2019 iMac still thinks it is overheating all the time and runs at only 800MHz, so it is a pretty sad machine.
 
brofkand said:
Odd the iMac 2019 wouldn't have had a T2 chip. Why didn't they include it, when every other Mac model by then had it?
Click to expand...
A big part of the T2 chip's security functionality was handling disk encryption. On T2 systems (and M systems beyond that) the SSD controller is baked into the T2 chip itself and the SSD chips soldered to the logic board were just raw NMVe chips. By comparison an M.2 SSD card (or SATA SDD or SATA hard disk) has the controller chip on the card/disk itself.

The 2019 iMac still used Fusion Drives as the default option. Since Fusion Drives had their own controllers built into the drive unit the T2 chip wouldn't have been able to do its thing, so it was omitted. The 2020 iMac was the first model to go 100% SSD so it got the T2 chip. The 2017 iMac Pro was always SSD-only so it got the T2 chip early.

M-series Macs have the SSD controller built into the SoC itself.
 
So a Mac book pro from only 2017 is just about dead in the water,? That's just egregious. My 2013 iMac is still kicking, client work, you name it. actually wanted to buy my old workplace MacBook pro that was a 2017 model because it just ran so well and I had just started learning after effects it was perfect.

updating Mac OS used to be a big deal until stability became a real issue and Apple started slipping with stupid bugs that once fixed only months later hey it's a new OS version all over again. I can't do this year to year stuff it doesn't make sense and introduces an instability I'm not prepared to deal with.

Hell, my m1max book is still on Monterey. I don't care about apples updates to silly little stuff like notes and Safari and crap since I don't use any of their software services.
 
Let’s hope the finally start using some name that matches the number

15 - O. Some nice name area in California with an O?
 
I wish they would return or add the ability to have independent settings for Display Sleep and System Sleep. I like the screen turning off in 10 min of inactivity but not the system necessarily. Maybe 30 min or so. Right now it's as soon as the screen turns off in 10 min which is what I like just for the screen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Alwis
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back