Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple adds native ultrawide display support in macOS 27 Golden Gate, bringing higher resolutions and persistent display arrangements to users of widescreen monitors.

Apple-Golden-Gate.jpg

The update allows ultrawide displays to run at resolutions up to 5K at 120Hz. Apple also says that display arrangements are now preserved across connections, so the layout automatically restores exactly as the user left it each time they plug in.

The feature addresses a longstanding pain point for Mac users with ultrawide setups, who previously had to work around limited native resolution options or manually reconfigure their display arrangements after each connection.

macOS 27 Golden Gate is expected to ship to the public this fall. It is available to developers in beta now.

Article Link: macOS 27 Golden Gate Gains Native Ultrawide Display Support
 
Great news! Now we can have higher refresh and resolution Mac display support and preserve the display arrangement also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ikir
I can't be the only one confused by this news? Currently I'm using the Dell U5226KW which is a 6k ultrawide with even higher resolution due to the more space in height (6144x2560), it runs just fine on 120hz. Daily I take my laptop home and next day just use the 1 cable thunderbolt to charge, connect keyboard and everything and never noticed any issues.
 
Cool i guess. I have a 45inch LG 5k2k and never had issue with it even running at 165hz.
That's the first monitor I've had in years that was actually properly supported on macOS from the start. Prior to this, I had two flavors of the 49" Samsung 5120x1440 and it was just a nightmare. For no reason whatsoever that resolution randomly wasn't supported by the OS and you would need to use DisplayRes or something to force it, and things would always go wonky upon reboot/login as the system went crazy with res flickering.

Even did the whole dance with support, and a higher level person said to me it seemed to be a bug and shouldn't happen that way, but Apple closed the report out as working as expected. Kinda eye-rollingly ridiculous that something so basic took this long, but glad it's here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jarman74
I don’t understand, I have a Samsung Neo G9 57 inch, 32:9, 7680x2160, supports 240Hz but I run it at 120.

I never had problems with Mac mini m4 and a macbook pro M3.
What exactly are they adding?
 
There aren't any retina (>200 ppi) Ultrawide monitors. The best we ever got was a 5120x2160 34” panel which was ~160 ppi. Does this mean that Apple are allowing HiDPI scaling modes on Ultrawide sub retina displays now? Is there any benefit for base M chips (which always lacked options compared to Pro/Max/Ultra chips)?
 
Curious what this actually means. There are limits on widescreen resolution support which are weird, but I'm running an LG Ultrawide right now. I'm assuming this just gives us mid 2000's resolution support which should have been around for a while now.
 
I wonder if the iPad gets this support too? I know everything looks oversized on an ultrawide with an iPad.
 
I don’t understand, I have a Samsung Neo G9 57 inch, 32:9, 7680x2160, supports 240Hz but I run it at 120.

I never had problems with Mac mini m4 and a macbook pro M3.
What exactly are they adding?
Since yesterday I’ve been trying to figure out what the news means about this because I have an m4 pro MacBook Pro and the same monitor as you. The only problem I’ve ever had is it likes to drop down to 60hz a lot, so maybe that is it?

I wish they’d fix their display scaling for resolutions that aren’t a multiple of their own resolutions. This is something Microsoft does well with.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.