I still don’t understand why Apple is so afraid of touchscreens on Macs when they are so good with them on mobile devices. It’s so much easier just to sign on the screen. Goofy workarounds like this should be unnecessary for the prices Apple charges.
Not quite sure I understand your thinking here. you don't use your fingernail on an iPhone or iPad, so why would it be related to the Newton? Apple's software is much more advanced now (especially since they laid the groundwork with handoff), so I can imagine this feature will work pretty smoothly.Wow, the Newton returns! Prepare for hilarity and such to ensue at any party.... Using my fingernail or a stencil on any credit-card reader's touchscreen usually results in half of my signature appearing. And sometimes only after repeated attempts. I've learned just to squiggle a scrawl and that's perfectly okay with the touchscreen. So much for security.
I find it a bit weird to use. I have a low end Dell PC that happens to have a touch screen, and have created a few signatures using that. Pretty handy. But touching screen feels a bit stretched.I still don’t understand why Apple is so afraid of touchscreens on Macs when they are so good with them on mobile devices. It’s so much easier just to sign on the screen. Goofy workarounds like this should be unnecessary for the prices Apple charges.
Likely a bug. iPhone pencil support will not cone any time soon.The image of the iPhone has an interface that says: "sign your name using your finger or pencil."; is that a real screenshot? a doctored image? If it's a screenshot, is it a mistake in iOS 13 or a sign that pencil support for (maybe the next) iPhone is finally coming with iOS 13?
Not with your iPhone/iPad—which is what this article is about...uh what? i been using preview create signatures for ages now.
That is not what it is designed for or ever will be used for. It's intent is to be able to conveniently sign a document like a permission slip or invoice or application or anything that does not require identity verification. I use the existing built-in functionality to avoid the print->sign->scan cycle.This is never going to take off in professional cases. This is why we have DocuSign etc.
Try it.
Sit at your desk, start typing and then lift one arm and touch the screen, swipe etc as if it’s for real. Move your arm back to the keyboard for more typing etc.
Now report back what you think of a vertically aligned touchscreen surface two feet or so in front of you.
Using a touch screen is fine for mobile devises, doesn't really work so well on computers.
Then for an example just create a stamp in Adobe if you do not want a digital verified signatureThat is not what it is designed for or ever will be used for. It's intent is to be able to conveniently sign a document like a permission slip or invoice or application or anything that does not require identity verification. I use the existing built-in functionality to avoid the print->sign->scan cycle.
Obviously DocuSign has its place, but this is not being offered up a as competitor to it.
This is never going to take off in professional cases. This is why we have DocuSign etc.
Who says it would have to be vertical?
I usually keep my screen at about a 30-45 angle from the desk, sometimes less when I'm editing photos or using the pen. I realize that's not a comfortable viewing angle for everyone, but it works extremely well for me.
My experience was quite different. I bought my Surface for photo editing and drawing. I thought I'd never use the touchscreen as an actual touchscreen, and was surprised how often it was simply more useful/faster than using the mouse. And how often I'm trying to reach up to my work monitor or poking at the screen on my Mom's Mac expecting something to happen. So for me, it's much more than a gimmick, and for graphic arts work, the touchscreen is simply awesome.
Full disclosure, while I have lots of Apple products, I haven't been a Mac guy since pre-OS X. But I never thought I'd live in a world where Microsoft of all companies built a better computer than Apple, especially for graphic arts. But (and I know this is very much just an opinion and not right for everyone), I don't think it's even close. And I didn't even have to buy a separate $999 stand.
On the downside, Microsoft can't quite get their Pen to work as well as an Apple Pencil, wish I could have the best of both worlds there.
I still don’t understand why Apple is so afraid of touchscreens on Macs when they are so good with them on mobile devices. It’s so much easier just to sign on the screen. Goofy workarounds like this should be unnecessary for the prices Apple charges.
I guess there some people who do not know that similar functionality is built into Preview already. You can go to the Tools->Annotate->Manage Signatures to create a signature. Once you have one saved you can insert it into a document. You can use the camera or trackpad to create one.
It is obviously not as good as this new functionality, but it is easy to use and works well for now. It saved a lot of time by removing ending the Print -> Sign -> Scan -> Merge back into PDF cycle.
4) If you want a touch screen, Apple has got you covered too!
Yes! It's called an iPad Pro.
You need an ipad
Wow, the Newton returns! Prepare for hilarity and such to ensue at any party.... Using my fingernail or a stencil on any credit-card reader's touchscreen usually results in half of my signature appearing. And sometimes only after repeated attempts. I've learned just to squiggle a scrawl and that's perfectly okay with the touchscreen. So much for security.
Things are moving rapidly that way. The purpose of iPadOS is to allow iPads to move out of the shadow of iPhones and closer to the world of macOS. At the same time the software infrastructure is being put in place in macOS, and Apple is pushing hard, to make it easier for developers to make their iPad apps run on Macs.If my £2500 iMac screen ends up looking like my iPhone screen (fingerprints and all) I’m not sure I’d be loving my purchase very long.
Just avoiding that outcome is reason enough not to so touchscreen Macs.
I think your question answers itself. Macs are desktop class devices with desktop user interfaces that don’t particularly shine with touch controls. Apple mobile devices have touch user interfaces that don’t particularly shine with cursor controls.I still don’t understand why Apple is so afraid of touchscreens on Macs when they are so good with them on mobile devices.
I realize that's not a comfortable viewing angle for everyone,
Yet you are asking for even higher prices.Goofy workarounds like this should be unnecessary for the prices Apple charges.