Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

With macOS 26.3 released, is Tahoe ready for mainstream use?

  • Yes — Things are running pretty smooth on my system(s), upgrading should be fine.

    Votes: 34 37.4%
  • No — Based on my personal experience with Tahoe, there are still some issues left, if you have conce

    Votes: 25 27.5%
  • No — Based on comments and feedback from others or things I have read, I think that waiting is the t

    Votes: 32 35.2%

  • Total voters
    91
  • Poll closed .

PotentPeas

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
EDIT: Sorry for the cut off poll choices. It won't let me edit them. I meant for the first "NO" to be for people who have tried Tahoe and have an issue, and the second "NO" to be for people just going off of feedback from others.

———

I'd like to try this poll after each minor macOS upgrade is released (X.1, X.2). I'm curious how community sentiment changes over time, and it could also help other users gauge the community consensus on whether upgrading at this time is a "good idea" or not.

The poll will remain open for 30 days. I'll post another one when macOS 26.4 drops. If Apple follows their typical release pattern, the release window for macOS 26.4 is "sometime in March". However, since 26.3 was "late" compared to the last few cycles (it usually comes in late January), I wouldn't be surprised if 26.4 is a little bit "late" too. (I will not post a poll for 26.3.1. If there is such a release, it will most likely include just a small number of targeted fixes and won't change the overall picture by much.)

Past polls:
macOS "Tahoe": 26.1 (37.5% yes); 26.2 (36.1% yes)
(I'll put some kind of chart here when I have some more data.)

———

As someone who values stability and "things working right" more than access to the latest new features, I'm holding off on upgrading to Tahoe until I believe that it will be a reasonably smooth experience.

With the initial Tahoe release, reading comments and posts from the community, I saw a lot of repeatedly noted issues. For example: Dock randomly going to autohide. Network printers not working. Rounded corners on PDFs. Large "hit box" for the green maximize button at the top of windows. To me, it really seems like Apple pushed Tahoe out to hit a self-imposed deadline, and it was still somewhat "beta" quality at launch; they did not wait for it to be adequately polished. ...However, these kinds of things seem to have been largely cleaned up and are largely addressed in 26.1, 26.2, and 26.3.

I still have seen screen flickering as a commonly reported issue in 26.2, for iMacs and certain external monitors (including Apple ones), and I'm not sure if that is resolved in 26.3. I think they are also still showing "00:00 PM" for noon in Finder (i.e. on file modification timestamps) if you have the system set to use 12-hour times. macOS 26.3 beta 3 also caused a decrease in graphics performance across many apps and games, and while it appears that they fixed that in time for the RC, the fact that they're making changes that could cause things like that to happen tells me that they might be still doing a little more than just "targeted bugfixes", and actually messing around with the guts of the OS (the graphics stack in this case), which makes me apprehensive.

Then on top of that, there is the divisive new design. I'm not especially worried about "getting used to" the new Liquid Glass aesthetic (as much as I don't like the huge corner radius), but I am a bit put off by some lack of consistency and polish that they're showing off. For example, text in transparent containers that is difficult to read, text in menu alignment being off depending on whether icons are present or not, and not using the same icon for the same function consistently. (Those last two examples are from this great article, which raises some good points whether or not you believe that the old HIG guidelines are still relevant.) They also apparently forced menu icons onto third-party apps, which I hadn't realized until recently. There was also the thing with corners being difficult to grab for some people, but I understand that this might have just been fixed just now with 26.3. (They also introduced an issue in the 26.3 RC which made it impossible to resize quicklook windows. Not sure if that was fixed in the final release...? [Edit] - Looks like they did fix it.)

I am interested in your take, after using macOS Tahoe 26.3 for a bit. Did they make any improvements that meaningfully fix or improve any issues you were experiencing with prior 26.X releases? Should a "regular" user upgrade yet? Is it "safe"? Or is it still not worth it, because of the bugs and UI jank?

Vote in the poll, and comment if you like!

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Liquid Glass is bad enough on my mobiles. No way I'm putting it on my Mac.
I think that Liquid Glass is going to be permanent as it solves the problem of having pop-up search boxes and the like. It's not an aesthetic design element, it's a functionality upgrade . I don't think people understand the "why" of Liquid Glass. I understand it's a paradigm shift, but so was doing away with the Control Strip and introducing tabs in browsers. I think when you understand the why of Liquid Glass it's easier to adopt it, but maybe that's just my take on it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cateye
26.2 fixed problems with Electron apps. Now it looks like much of other graphic performance issues are fixed with 26.3. Things appear to be moving in the right direction...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCKLMT
26.2 fixed problems with Electron apps. Now it looks like much of other graphic performance issues are fixed with 26.3. Things appear to be moving in the right direction...
It sounds like we're talking about an early beta version. And apart from that, some of the design decisions are highly questionable, while others are clearly just bad.
 
I will likely upgrade one of my systems to macOS 26, either on my existing Mac mini M2Pro or on an M5 generation Mac Studio, where it will already be installed. If I can wait on WWDC I might, although putting it on my mini (which shifted from regular duty to the shelf just this month when I decided to switch up how I compute) is certainly plausible. Perhaps 26.4?

The conflicting rumours here give me pause, though. In the autumn I would have bet that we have M5s available throughout the entire lineup by March of this year. With the continual delay of even the base M5 not being in the most popular computers they exist in (iMac, MacBook Air) and no real word on other chips other than references to a “Max” and “Ultra” variant code in macOS (nothing about a “Pro”), I wonder how Apple has decided to deal with the present silicon shortages. Perhaps doubling down on being The iPhone Company™?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasualFanboy
The conflicting rumours here give me pause, though.

There is going to be an event on March 4, so we will have some product announcements in about two weeks. I don't know about the MacBook Air and iMac, though. Rumors seem to be pointing strongly towards MacBook Pro (M5 Pro/Max), MacBook (a "cheap" one with iPhone A-series CPU), and iPhone 17e.
 
It sounds like we're talking about an early beta version. And apart from that, some of the design decisions are highly questionable, while others are clearly just bad.
Design is highly subjective thing while technical issues are not. While new look is not something to be in awe about, it is not the main decider as graphical interface of a computer is just a tool for a work done on it. 26.0 - 26-2 had major problems with graphic performance (in my use case) and I see that these are gone.

I do not base my decisions on design (of the user interface). Sequoia was able to bork the file system (after enabling Apple intelligence) in a way that only remediation was to wipe, repartition and do clean install - thus Sequoia is not without its' own problems.
 
Design is highly subjective thing while technical issues are not. While new look is not something to be in awe about, it is not the main decider as graphical interface of a computer is just a tool for a work done on it. 26.0 - 26-2 had major problems with graphic performance (in my use case) and I see that these are gone.

I do not base my decisions on design (of the user interface). Sequoia was able to bork the file system (after enabling Apple intelligence) in a way that only remediation was to wipe, repartition and do clean install - thus Sequoia is not without its' own problems.
I was not aware of that clearly severe bug with Apple AI. Very glad my reaction to the option to enable it was, well, Luddite! Didn't trust it at all.
 
There is going to be an event on March 4, so we will have some product announcements in about two weeks. I don't know about the MacBook Air and iMac, though. Rumors seem to be pointing strongly towards MacBook Pro (M5 Pro/Max), MacBook (a "cheap" one with iPhone A-series CPU), and iPhone 17e.
I would not count on it. In fact, I don’t. Nothing points towards an M5Pro, for example. Exactly zero data points. Having “events” at three cities, without announcing a way to watch via streaming, also bodes poorly for product announcements. Historically it counts against any.

All that said, Apple is more than capable of changing its playbook however and whenever it feels the want or need.

Which takes me back to “conflicting rumours”. 🤷‍♂️

There are approximately a metric s* ton of hopes and dreams, however… including my own.
 
As promised, my explanation for staying with Sequoia with my M2 MBP Max:

it's quite simple really and has less to do with MacOS and more so with iOS and Apple's rather intrusive and extreme push to upgrade to iOS26. Well, I did get a sour taste of the Safari 26 update also that reverted my 3 year old MBP to a "C2D feel" in terms of opening any and all sites suddenly. Naturally...I reverted back to 18.6.

But to the actual hesitation:

For 6 years I used a OG SE (still own it) and in its last years the battery was severely dying, especially noticeable carried outside in European Winter. I had Apple replace it, but all available iOS updates were actually the causitive factor of it becoming unreliable, extremely slow and ultimately unusable.

Fast forward 2023 and I bought the MBP (after 13 yrs of a mid-2009 MBP {still have it}) and also replaced the SE with a 13 Mini at the same time. The Mini has been rather brilliant actually. Bought with iOS 15 end of 2022, returned and repurchased due to HW issues a month later, it was forced into running iOS 16! So I made the mistake of not only "upgrading" to iOS 17 BUT also iOS 18. I know..my bad...should have stayed with 17.

So whilst I don't have an issue going with Tahoe on the MBP, I do not want to keep making things worse moving to iOS 26, as that will kill the Mini as much as the SE became unusable. And here's the issue:

I backup my iP tethered to the Mac! However...IF I want to continue doing this after moving to Tahoe...it will force the 13 Mini to move to iOS 26 IF I want to continue such backups.

It's bad enough that SystemPrefs is permanently displaying this upgrade notification...so blatently intrusive now on BOTH iOS and MacOS on devices that I've only owned for 3 years.

That's pretty much the story really. To add that I'm not a seasoned Apple user really, having been introduced to the Apple world in 2006. iLife and all (when ALL was included) and even that is now being eroded.
 
It's bad enough that SystemPrefs is permanently displaying this upgrade notification...so blatently intrusive now on BOTH iOS and MacOS on devices that I've only owned for 3 years.

You can get rid of the upgrade notification.

On the iPhone: Switch to the iOS 18 beta channel. (They don't push out iOS 18 beta updates anymore, so you don't risk getting one of those by accident, but it will block the iOS 26 nag.)

On the Mac: See
and

I do personally recommend staying on a release with active security support. That generally gets you about 3 months to upgrade after a new major version is out (for iOS). You'll have to upgrade eventually anyway, as app support dries up. (Could take a couple of years before you start to feel it.) I did move to iOS 26 on my iPhone 12 Pro too early. There was some battery drain going on with the early releases. However, I am fine with it as of iOS 26.3. Performance is fine, battery is fine, and that phone is older than your Mini.
 
You can get rid of the upgrade notification.

On the iPhone: Switch to the iOS 18 beta channel. (They don't push out iOS 18 beta updates anymore, so you don't risk getting one of those by accident, but it will block the iOS 26 nag.)

On the Mac: See
and

I do personally recommend staying on a release with active security support. That generally gets you about 3 months to upgrade after a new major version is out (for iOS). You'll have to upgrade eventually anyway, as app support dries up. (Could take a couple of years before you start to feel it.) I did move to iOS 26 on my iPhone 12 Pro too early. There was some battery drain going on with the early releases. However, I am fine with it as of iOS 26.3. Performance is fine, battery is fine, and that phone is older than your Mini.
Thanks for the links. And here a post where I was surprised I wasn't getting anything intrusive, no pushing to upgrade and other's already did...except for now.

It's not so much those notifications that frustrate, more so my backup method being so reliant and tied to ios26+Tahoe vs ios18+Sequoia.

I do wonder though. The iPP 12 appears somewhat similar to the 13 Mini spec wise. Except...RAM (6 vs 4) and that I have gut feeling is the huge slow down, battery killer? But who can really forecast this kind of stuff. Moving to .0 or .1 after a major iOS version has mostly had a positive effect on the battery, subsequent iterations however appear to slow things down once again. Seen this time and time again.
 
It's not so much those notifications that frustrate, more so my backup method being so reliant and tied to ios26+Tahoe vs ios18+Sequoia.
I didn't realize that Tahoe would force you to upgrade iOS in order to back up an iPhone. Seems like that "shouldn't" be required... You can still back up older phones (that don't support iOS 26 at all), right?

Anyway, I used to back up my phone that way, but it is easier to just use the automatic iCloud backup (+ Advanced Data Protection) so that's what I do now. It wouldn't require any particular OS on the Mac side. (But it would cost you some money for cloud storage, if you aren't already paying.)
 
I didn't realize that Tahoe would force you to upgrade iOS in order to back up an iPhone. Seems like that "shouldn't" be required... You can still back up older phones (that don't support iOS 26 at all), right?

Anyway, I used to back up my phone that way, but it is easier to just use the automatic iCloud backup (+ Advanced Data Protection) so that's what I do now. It wouldn't require any particular OS on the Mac side. (But it would cost you some money for cloud storage, if you aren't already paying.)
And that's the crazy push, the reason I hadn't moved to Tahoe. For many years I was backing up my OG SE through various iOS iterations using a Catalina DosDude MBP eons old, via Finder or iTunes, tethered with no ridiculous limitations that Apple is synthetically forcing upon us.

I do use iCloud but merely as a convenience to share between devices, and not all media either. Contacts, calendars, Notes, that kind of thing. Vid and pics I do prefer to keep local. The iP stuff I backup to the MBP directly and the Mac enjoys a rotating 3-2-1 (TM+Clone) scheme to a number of DAS NVMe's. Actually this strategy saved my bacon shortly after getting the MBP and a horrid liquid accident totally destroyed the new Mac. Backup was luckily 24 hrs old and AC+ replaced every single component except for the lower plate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PotentPeas
I didn't realize that Tahoe would force you to upgrade iOS in order to back up an iPhone. Seems like that "shouldn't" be required... You can still back up older phones (that don't support iOS 26 at all), right?

Anyway, I used to back up my phone that way, but it is easier to just use the automatic iCloud backup (+ Advanced Data Protection) so that's what I do now. It wouldn't require any particular OS on the Mac side. (But it would cost you some money for cloud storage, if you aren't already paying.)
There does appear to be some horrible connection between iOS 26 and the Mac the O/S - and as a result, I’m unable to back up older phone 12 Pro Max that isn’t using iOS 26 - because it also refuses to upgrade to iOS 26.

Worse, it won’t unpair from Apple Watch, causing issues with the health app which only syncs randomly to new iPhone 17. For reasons unexplained, Apple insists this is because the 12 Pro Max needs upgrading to OS 26 in order to relinquish the Watch (why?) and I regret doing on 17 Pro Max cuz it appears to have trashed the cameras... Since the 12 won’t upgrade on its own they had me try doing it via the Mac, which also states that it's up-to-date on 18.7.1… SO Apple now insists I must update the Mac from Sequoia to Tahoe, refusing to help further with the Health app sync problem until I do so.

I'm reluctant to update Mac for what I assume on this forum are obvious reasons, so I’m stuck. I can't believe Apple has built something else that removes user autonomy from the decision-making process.
 
Last edited:
I think that Liquid Glass is going to be permanent as it solves the problem of having pop-up search boxes and the like. It's not an aesthetic design element, it's a functionality upgrade . I don't think people understand the "why" of Liquid Glass. I understand it's a paradigm shift, but so was doing away with the Control Strip and introducing tabs in browsers. I think when you understand the why of Liquid Glass it's easier to adopt it, but maybe that's just my take on it.
You're right, like many, I certainly don't understand the ‘why' of liquid glass, and I don't understand what problem it is supposed to solve. It just makes everything more difficult to see. Apart from revealing the presence of pop-up search boxes, what do you see as the advantage?
 
  • Like
Reactions: leifp
After my Mac crashed again today (5 times since 26 came out and never before on any other Mac OS version) I am downgrading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AslashA
What an unpleasant surprise awaited me yesterday! It's the Tahoe 26.3.
Screenshot 2026-02-22 at 19.21.42.png

I can't figure out what bugs they're fixing in their updates, but they've had this problem since the Tahoe's release! Is it really impossible to fix this problem within almost a year???

I roll back to the Sequoia.
 
There does appear to be some horrible connection between iOS 26 and the Mac the O/S - and as a result, I’m unable to back up older phone 12 Pro Max that isn’t using iOS 26 - because it also refuses to upgrade to iOS 26.

Worse, it won’t unpair from Apple Watch, causing issues with the health app which only syncs randomly to new iPhone 17. For reasons unexplained, Apple insists this is because the 12 Pro Max needs upgrading to OS 26 in order to relinquish the Watch (why?) and I regret doing on 17 Pro Max cuz it appears to have trashed the cameras... Since the 12 won’t upgrade on its own they had me try doing it via the Mac, which also states that it's up-to-date on 18.7.1… SO Apple now insists I must update the Mac from Sequoia to Tahoe, refusing to help further with the Health app sync problem until I do so.

I'm reluctant to update Mac for what I assume on this forum are obvious reasons, so I’m stuck. I can't believe Apple has built something else that removes user autonomy from the decision-making process.
Yes, this is something I learned a long time ago: don’t upgrade a Mac or iPhone to different levels of OS if you ever want to hook them up. It’s extra fun as my wife is more likely to borrow my iPhone and more likely to have an out of date macOS on her Mac. I’m sure there are workarounds but I never cared enough to find out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azedquery
Yes, this is something I learned a long time ago: don’t upgrade a Mac or iPhone to different levels of OS if you ever want to hook them up. It’s extra fun as my wife is more likely to borrow my iPhone and more likely to have an out of date macOS on her Mac. I’m sure there are workarounds but I never cared enough to find out.
Never occurred to me before and the irony is I don’t even want to hook them up! I just want the iPhone 12 to reliniqish its grip on the watch, so the watch will talk to the iPhone 17. Who’d have imagined I’d need to upgrade the Mac (that I don't have hooked up to either of them) to achieve that. I’m looking for a solution but…[shrugs dramatically, wipes brow]...
 
  • Love
Reactions: rmadsen3
Yes, this is something I learned a long time ago: don’t upgrade a Mac or iPhone to different levels of OS if you ever want to hook them up. It’s extra fun as my wife is more likely to borrow my iPhone and more likely to have an out of date macOS on her Mac. I’m sure there are workarounds but I never cared enough to find out.
I'm curious what problems you are having here...

I still have Sequoia on my Mac, and I have iOS 26 on my phone. I have had no problems having the two of them interact. I can plug in my phone and drop files to it. I can use the iPhone Mirroring app. I haven't tried to update my phone‚ but I have updated some iPads running iPadOS 26.x over USB from my Mac running Sequoia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drumcat
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.