No. I don't think you're wondering. You don't rigorously contemplate the question you're asking. You didn't seek out any facts or even public writings that support your claims. In short, you don't act like a skeptic. Flat-earthers don't "wonder" if their idea makes rational sense. Anti-vaxxers don't have periodic reviews of the data to see if their thinking is nonsensical. And moon landing conspiracy theorists don't really "wonder" if their ideas are just kooky.Here's what I am wondering - has it ever occurred to you that [SNIP]
That's what it is - creating diseased humans who will need medication all their life. Logically, this is the goal of profit-driven pharma as it milks the cash cows all their life. Government mandated medication is even better of course, guaranteed profits...
What if a used car dealership could somehow convince people to buy their ********* cars else grandma dies? Their sales would boom!
Your hypothetical makes absolutely no sense. No auto dealer -- new or used -- would ever try this. There would be no evidence supporting their claim. And, no, sales would not boom. This analogy is a categorical failure.
Blood is expensive - why would you give it to the hospital system for free?
Actually, there are plenty of services that will pay for donations. Look it up. If you would only donate because a service pays you for the donation, then you should donate there. AFAIK, most regular donors avoid such services. Hospitals prefer to receive their blood from voluntary sources, because paid donors may not follow the donation rules as faithfully as the volunteers.
The hospitals aren't getting blood and blood products "for free". A 2011 PUBMED article notes the average cost to hospitals was ~$211/unit.
You have no idea where [your donated blood is] going.
Actually, I have a very good idea where it's going. The Red Cross provides a "My Blood Journey" in their App; my last donation was used by the Penn Presbyterian Medical Center in Philadelphia, PA. That unit of blood made it through the system very quickly; my [anecdotal] data leads me to guess that blood supply reserves are rather low.
Pharma's interest lies in subscription medication, with devastating effects on the health of all humans world wide. Which is why I call it a disease-care system.
Did you mean "prescription medication"? "Subscription medication" is not a term.
If you were thinking/wondering, you'd realize whole blood (and the other blood products) are anti-pharma. They are natural medications. If you're anti-pharma, you should be pro-blood, right?
All of the blood donation operations have medical doctors on their staff. All hospitals have doctors who are thoroughly competent in the nuances of whole blood and partial blood product transfusions. There's a published and peer-reviewed journal on the methodology of transfusion. You're welcome to be a denialist of the planet's blood-donation system, but your ideas here make about as much sense as flat-earth thinking.