Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is off-topic, but sending a PM regarding each and every deleted post is not realistic. The moderators just do not have time or energy to compose dozens of PMs every day, and the vast majority of the time, it's pretty clear why a post has been deleted. If you have a question regarding a specific deleted post feel free to contact the moderators and we'll get back to you.

As for the relevance to this thread, we have never allowed discussion of ways to circumvent the display of ads on macrumors.com other than via contributing to the site. We prefer not to shoot ourselves in the foot. ;)
 
Could be wrong but highly doubt it.

Me too. I have seen this "phenominom" on other Boards. ;)

EDIT: However, not withstanding WC's previous post, I think advising someone with over 500 posts, such as yourself, would not be such an odious task.

o34-1.gif
 
Me too. I have seen this "phenominom" on other Boards. ;)

You mean one in which mods do other things and don't always PM users over trivial rule violations?
EDIT: However, not withstanding WC's previous post, I think advising someone with over 500 posts, such as yourself, would not be such an odious task.

Except that there are quite a few members with over 500 posts (1,652 members in fact). Every minor error would require a PM and would require the work of many mods, even if they were all able to work 24/7 in some miraculous fashion.

Remember that the mods are real people who volunteer some of their spare time to do this. Give them a break and be glad that the forums are so well maintained by the mods given the amount of traffic they see everyday.
 
I've just had a glance at the FAQ and although it mentions what a Demi God is, maybe its worth adding a question "What is a Demi God/Demi Godess?" with the answer to the FAQ and see if that helps...
 
That would be helpful but then we would need to find a way to get people to read the FAQ.
 
That would be helpful but then we would need to find a way to get people to read the FAQ.

I posted a solution to the problem a hundred or so posts ago.

Just like the "I Accept" button on most everything downloaded these days: I have read MR Faq's, I have read MR Forum rules for condition of being given a member acct.

Anyone asks about Demi whatever, standard pasted reply is to "read membership acceptance material."
 
If Demi was never an option I could care less, but it has become a tradition. I think it means more than just paying money. It has become a symbol of all that is great with Macrumors. It is something that other forums don't have.
Well said.

At this point, I would venture to say that many Demi's do not want to give up their title.
 
Oh god, I've said this quite a few times with good reception but what the hell, one more for gits and shiggles, and then I'll never harp on about it again...

Yeah, maybe it doesn't NEED to be changed but there's a logical and very easy solution...

omit the demi title from the moderators, like so:

macrumors god (administrator)
macrumors god (moderator)
macrumors goddess (moderator)

and the rest can stay as is:

macrumors demi-god
macrumors demi-goddesss
contributor


It's never made much sense to me that the staff do not share more similar user titles. Yeah anyone can look it up and yeah it can stay as is but why not give it a slightly more logical orientation? <shrug> Man, we got some stubborn, change-resistant admins! :p

Just my two pennies though, for what it's worth.
 
^^ Plus the FAQ changes it might just make enough difference, its worth a try without removing the "Demi God" thing.
 
What about:

macrumors god (administrator)
macrumors god (moderator)
macrumors goddess (moderator)

macrumors demi-god (contributor)
macrumors demi-goddesss (contributor)
contributor
 
That would make it more confusing, just say Moderator should make it easier.

macrumors (moderator) Or moderatess for the ladies.
macrumors (administrator)
macrumors Demi-God
macrumors Demi-Goddess
 
there's a logical and very easy solution...

Yeah, we all just get on with our 'lives', and stop trying to fix something that is absolutely not broken.

It's not going to make it easier, people are still going to ask stupid questions, because they'll continue to ignore the FAQ/Rules.


To quote Brian in the last episode of Family Guy:

If you don't like it, go on the internet and complain.

Oh, wait. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, we all just get on with our 'lives', and stop trying to fix something that is absolutely not broken.

It's not going to make it easier, people are still going to ask stupid questions, because they'll continue to ignore the FAQ/Rules.
Once again, this really isn't a rule/FAQ issue, because it's not something one would think to look up, rather, it's just assumed by most newcomers that Demi-God means moderator.

Sure, it's be great if everyone constantly read over and memorized the rules and FAQs (perhaps had them tattooed to their forehead), but that simply isn't a realistic expectation. What's the problem with making the current system easier to understand (resulting in less confusion and fewer questions)?
 
Is it confusing or more ignorance to not find the answer. 7 years of this site and never a problem.
 
You mean one in which mods do other things and don't always PM users over trivial rule violations?

Except that there are quite a few members with over 500 posts (1,652 members in fact). Every minor error would require a PM and would require the work of many mods, even if they were all able to work 24/7 in some miraculous fashion.

Remember that the mods are real people who volunteer some of their spare time to do this. Give them a break and be glad that the forums are so well maintained by the mods given the amount of traffic they see everyday.

It's a simple bit of PHP. When a moderator deletes the post, check the number of the rule that it violates in a little list that appears next to the confirmation dialogue. A form PM is sent to the offending user from a "catch-all" account.

That's the neat thing about computers. If you have a repetitive task that you want to perform, five minutes of programming will make it completely automatic.
 
It's a simple bit of PHP. When a moderator deletes the post, check the number of the rule that it violates in a little list that appears next to the confirmation dialogue. A form PM is sent to the offending user from a "catch-all" account.

That's the neat thing about computers. If you have a repetitive task that you want to perform, five minutes of programming will make it completely automatic.
While in theory that could work, it is still an extra step for the mods. I don't know how many members want a response but they can always PM the mod to get the reason if they really want to know.
 
You should watch user trends in Forum Spy. When someone posts a lot you notice.

Forum Spy just isn't worth it to me. Sure, it may raise my post count, but who cares? Most times I look in Forum Spy, there's nothing there that I feel I am qualified to answer, and I like to check out the threads that I may have missed a day or two ago, and Forum Spy doesn't let you do that.
 


Forum Spy just isn't worth it to me. Sure, it may raise my post count, but who cares? Most times I look in Forum Spy, there's nothing there that I feel I am qualified to answer, and I like to check out the threads that I may have missed a day or two ago, and Forum Spy doesn't let you do that.

i live on forum spy haha. now when i go to other forums, im helplessly looking for it and its not there:(
 
Once again, this really isn't a rule/FAQ issue, because it's not something one would think to look up, rather, it's just assumed by most newcomers that Demi-God means moderator.

I think it most certainly is a rules/FAQ issue. People don't like to read the FAQ or rules these days and then they decide to just create new threads willy-nilly.

Let's pretend it was a more serious problem, like people posting requests about illegal software copying. That's in the rules. But, according to your logic, we should change that rule because people don't want to read about it and assume they have the right to ask whatever they want.
Sure, it's be great if everyone constantly read over and memorized the rules and FAQs (perhaps had them tattooed to their forehead), but that simply isn't a realistic expectation. What's the problem with making the current system easier to understand (resulting in less confusion and fewer questions)?
One doesn't need to have the rules memorized, but people should know that when they have a question, there are guides and the FAQ available to them. A relatively small time investment on the part of the individual can lead to better results for everyone.

And the problem with changing the titles as they are now is that there is no guarantee that doing so will produce any favorable results. At some point or another, someone is going to confuse a mod for a non-mod.

Besides, there's a certain traditional aspect behind the titles here, and a lot of us like them.
It's a simple bit of PHP. When a moderator deletes the post, check the number of the rule that it violates in a little list that appears next to the confirmation dialogue. A form PM is sent to the offending user from a "catch-all" account.

I'm sure the admins would want to hear about this. Even if they don't ultimately use the idea, they might be able to rig up something else useful.

That's the neat thing about computers. If you have a repetitive task that you want to perform, five minutes of programming will make it completely automatic.

Your patronizing aside, it's nice on paper, but it will not end up working out like that. Doctor Q has mentioned before that messing with vB code, while possible, can lead to unpredictable side effects.

The mods and admins here do a great job considering the traffic on these boards, and my post was really meant to reflect the attitude, not the technological standpoint, that people should have when approaching situations like one of their posts being removed or edited.
 
Yeah, we all just get on with our 'lives', and stop trying to fix something that is absolutely not broken.

It's not going to make it easier, people are still going to ask stupid questions, because they'll continue to ignore the FAQ/Rules.


To quote Brian in the last episode of Family Guy:



Oh, wait. :rolleyes:

WoooOOOOooooOOOOoooo, pardon me all over the place! :p
 
I think it most certainly is a rules/FAQ issue. People don't like to read the FAQ or rules

But the problem is that now to find the information in the FAQ you have to print them out and read the whole thing, you can't glance at the contents and see the question in the list.

I personally would glance at the FAQ before PM'ing a mod, but I probably wouldn't read the whole thing in detail.
 
But the problem is that now to find the information in the FAQ you have to print them out and read the whole thing, you can't glance at the contents and see the question in the list.

You're right, a list of questions at the top would help tremendously.

It would be easy to do if we made each question its own wiki header. It would appear in the "article outline" box at the top.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.