Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


For this week's giveaway, we've teamed up with Lululook to offer MacRumors readers a chance to win an iPhone 17 Pro and a 25W Qi2.2 3-in-1 Charger from Lululook to go along with it.

lululook-25w-charger.jpg

Priced at $79, Lululook's 3-in-1 Charging Station is able to charge an iPhone, AirPods, and Apple Watch at the same time. It features Qi 2.2 support and certification, so it is able to charge the iPhone 16 and iPhone 17 models at up to 25W, the same as Apple's latest MagSafe specification. With 25W Qi charging, an iPhone 17 can wirelessly charge to 50 percent battery in 30 minutes.

lululook-charger-desk.jpg

The stand can be used in either portrait or landscape mode, with the iPhone charging platform located at the top, plus the viewing angle can be adjusted thanks to several included hinges. The Apple Watch charger folds out from the middle, and the AirPods charge at the bottom. The whole 3-in-1 charger collapses down into a square puck when not in use, making it ideal for travel. The charger weighs just 6.2 ounces and it's less than an inch thick when folded up.

lululook-25w-charger-size.jpg

Lululook made the stand out of aluminum that matches Apple's iPhone 17 Pro models, and it comes in orange, desert gold, or titanium. The orange shade is the same color as the orange iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. The aluminum resists fingerprints and smudges, and there are soft silicone pads on the bottom and the charging area to keep the charger stable and devices scratch free.

In addition to charging an iPhone at 25W, the charger provides 5W for the Apple Watch and 5W for the AirPods. The 3-in-1 Charging Station is powered via USB-C, and Lululook includes a 45W power adapter and a 3.28-foot USB cable. There's also a portable organizer to hold the cables and the charger during travel.

lululook-25w-chargers-color.jpg

We have a Lululook 3-in-1 Charging Station and iPhone 17 Pro to give away to one lucky MacRumors reader. To enter to win, use the widget below and enter an email address. Email addresses will be used solely for contact purposes to reach the winner(s) and send the prize(s). You can earn additional entries by subscribing to our weekly newsletter, subscribing to our YouTube channel, following us on Twitter, following us on Instagram, following us on Threads, or visiting the MacRumors Facebook page.

Due to the complexities of international laws regarding giveaways, only U.S. residents who are 18 years or older, UK residents who are 18 years or older, and Canadian residents who have reached the age of majority in their province or territory are eligible to enter. All federal, state, provincial, and/or local taxes, fees, and surcharges are the sole responsibility of the prize winner. To offer feedback or get more information on the giveaway restrictions, please refer to our Site Feedback section, as that is where discussion of the rules will be redirected.

The contest will run from today (March 13) at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time through 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on March 20. The winner will be chosen randomly on or shortly after March 20 and will be contacted by email. The winner will have 48 hours to respond and provide a shipping address before a new winner is chosen.

Article Link: MacRumors Giveaway: Win an iPhone 17 Pro and 25W Qi Charger From Lululook
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195
Is this the same company as Ku Xiu? Their Qi 2.2 25 watt three in one travel charger appears to be nearly identical and perhaps priced lower at $53.99 after coupon on the largest internet retailer. I’m curious what, if any differences, there are between them.
 
Is this the same company as Ku Xiu? Their Qi 2.2 25 watt three in one travel charger appears to be nearly identical and perhaps priced lower at $53.99 after coupon on the largest internet retailer. I’m curious what, if any differences, there are between them.
Typical Chinese stuff.. someone makes it and 424 companies put their logo on it.
 
I have an older version and I love it. It sits on my desk at all times until I travel and it folds up into a case. This one is a little nicer and more powerful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: that be me
In testing, only 25w MagSafe or Qi 2.2 chargers with active cooling are actually able to appreciably charge anywhere near 25w due to thermal constraints. 25w chargers without active cooling are only marginally faster than 15w ones, and are not able to hit that 0-50% in 30 mins metric in real world use.
 
I'm still not sure about the orange version of the phone, but if I won this and had my choice I think I would definitely ask for the orange version of the charger, as a visual cue not to accidentally leave it somewhere or let it get lost on a messy table. Not to mention it really looks cool. The other two colors look like they'd fit fine in an office.
 
I ordered a charger from Lululook about 9 months ago. What I got was a box with an old battery and paper. I learned my lesson. Customer service is non existent, got my money back from my CC company
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleProductsUser
Looks nice, except after they printed ugly logos in two places.

Apple has a 'bit' better brand and even they would not put their logo in these places.
 
Is this the same company as Ku Xiu? Their Qi 2.2 25 watt three in one travel charger appears to be nearly identical and perhaps priced lower at $53.99 after coupon on the largest internet retailer. I’m curious what, if any differences, there are between them.

It's a white-label product, made by a particular manufacturer, and sold under various brands by different sellers. Lululook, Kuxiu, and many others. They don't even bother to alter the original manufacturer's Xxx model names in many cases.

This is the company that produces these folding chargers, and holds the patent on the design.

Peruse the WPC Qi-certified database, and it's easy to spot others selling the same product under different brand names.

This model in particular has double-joints, allowing it to lay completely flat on a surface as pictured. The model that Kuxiu sells does not. That also requires the watch charger to pivot from the other side, resulting in the watch sitting closer to the surface when used in upright position.

Since this is an Apple forum, it should be noted these chargers do not have MFW-certified watch charging modules, which should be a glaring omission in this higher price segment. The cheap chargers skip them to keep their cost low, but something that retails for closer to $100 bucks has less of an excuse.

Something else to note, for these types of chargers -- the beauty shots often show them in settings, but as static displays, neat and tidy and not plugged into anything. The situation changes when they are asked to function, and plugged into a cable, which might bother some depending on whether the power input port is in the back, or on the side, as with this model.

Typical Chinese stuff.. someone makes it and 424 companies put their logo on it.

Bingo.
 
Last edited:
As another user said above, Lululook’s customer service is basically nonexistent. I bought an expensive Apple Watch strap that unlocks itself. I almost dropped my flashy new Watch to the ground or lost it because of this faulty strap. I sent Lululook like 10 emails and I’m still waiting for their reply. Check Lululook’s page on Trustpilot if you want to read other customers experiences.

I just registered MacRumors so I can post this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As another user said above, Lululook’s customer service is basically nonexistent. I bought an expensive Apple Watch strap that unlocks itself. I almost dropped my flashy new Watch to the ground or lost it because of this faulty strap. I sent Lululook like 10 emails and I’m still waiting for their reply. Check Lululook’s page on Trustpilot if you want to read other customers experiences.

I just registered MacRumors so I can post this.
Sounds like you received a Lululemon.
 
Ok, went to Macrumors and Youtub, entered contest, then, a first in these things, had to "verify" meeself with apps I don't use. So I tried entering with the MacRumors User forum "bonus. Same rubbish process. No thanks nosy whomevers at MacRumors. Not worth the tchochkees offered. Why can't we just send in a postcard ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.