Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Re: ibrowse

Originally posted by linescreen
the problem with an apple branded browser is that it will be one more browser to develop for.....and that being said companies won't develop for it.

every big comapny i know of is standerdizing on ie for the pc. now i suspect that ie for the mac is a lot closer to those html, css, javascript standards than chimera.

That's not true. Chimera/Navigator has the same rendering engine as Mozilla. There are no layout and design issues that are differnt from any flavor of the Mozilla 1.1 - 1.3 release and it's derivaties. In actuality, these are not only the fastest rendering engines, but the most accurate and standards compliant.
 
Originally posted by Centris 650
iBrowse? Couldn't they come up with a better name? Maybe they could come out with a top for your mac and call it iLid?😀 🙄

I came up with the suggested name of "iBrowse" for a Apple-branded browser a few weeks ago in another thread. I am prepared to take the full blame -- or a piece of the action if Apple uses it, which ever the case may be.
 
How about iWeb?

I still contend that there will be an Apple browser, but they know better than to call it iBrowse.
What about iBrowser or iWeb. My best guess is as good as yours.

BTW, Kudos to arnette on kicking back, relaxing, and waiting for the keynote. 🙂
 
oh great. my mom will probably want to use iphoto v2, but the drivers for her card reader will not work above 10.2... assuming that iphoto will only be for 10.2.2-3 and above, now doesn't that make everybody happy >_<
 
video iPod

Anyone know how well the archos thing is going as far as sales???

http://www.archos.com/lang=en/products/prw_500375.html?country=us

I hate that archos beat apple to it, but I'm sure if Apple did do a video iPod, it would be way cooler than this one.... (but probaly more than $379 -- unfortunately)


I don't know if I'd pay more than that for a video iPod... that's what I'm afraid of.. just how much would one have to cost, coming from Apple?
 
Open your checkbooks...

I don't know about a video iPod, but I do know that there are times when we really pay a premium to be Mac users.
It's worth it, though (usually) 🙂
 
I've followed all the MWSF rumor stories. I'm fully prepared for the keynote speech. Now I hope that Apple surprises us all and announces something totally unexpected!
 
Some people were hinting on the possibility of speed bumps across the line.

If we're lucky this'll happen, should be interesting to see if the 7457 (512k L2, and more L3) makes it with the boosted bus this month.

But that would have required Motorola and HiP7 process partner AMD to get the problems worked out. 🙄
 
TV on your iPod!

I'm still not sure we're going to see these video iPods, although we could see another device or DLD with mp4 video.

Originally posted by DannyZR2
Anyone know how well the archos thing is going as far as sales???

http://www.archos.com/lang=en/produ...html?country=us

I hate that archos beat apple to it, but I'm sure if Apple did do a video iPod, it would be way cooler than this one.... (but probaly more than $379 -- unfortunately)

I don't know if I'd pay more than that for a video iPod... that's what I'm afraid of.. just how much would one have to cost, coming from Apple?

I looked at the device he mentioned and it hit me. Imagine the implications of an mp4 movie device like an iPod II with something like El Gato's EyeTV!
Don't just watch home movies on your iPod, watch your favorite episode of Seinfeld or last night's CSI: Miami (why did Kim Delany leave?)! With an expansive 5, 10, or 20 GB hard drive and Firewire (2.0?) transfers, the possibilities would be limitless (assuming you have cable).
One thing. The screen would need to be at least an inch bigger.
 
What??!! No Final Cut Pro 4??!! I think that there will be an upgrade to FCP to support the new pro-sumer DV cameras with 24fsp frame rates. Apple has always lead the way in the pro-sumer market and this is the next evolution for DV.

If there is no announcement at MWSF, then it will probably be in the weeks that follow.😀
 
What I really would like to see is AppleWorks 7, It has been ages since AppleWorks 6 has been released. Maybe the AppleWorks developers are working on iOffice or a supercharged AppleWorks
 
Will you guys drop the i convention?
Not everything will have an i on the front, i am actually starting to hate all of those names 🙂

iMac, fine, thats cool
iBook...yup
iMovie, okay

iBrowse? no
iOffice? definately no

Apple isnt stupid...so I hope they dont rename everything they make under that convention.
 
Re: ibrowse

Originally posted by linescreen
the problem with an apple branded browser is that it will be one more browser to develop for.....and that being said companies won't develop for it.

every big comapny i know of is standerdizing on ie for the pc. now i suspect that ie for the mac is a lot closer to those html, css, javascript standards than chimera.

Quite the contrary. I'm very involved with the HTML development across one of the largest software companies, and my team will be very happy if IE is dropped as the official Mac browser. The reason is that IE on the Mac is a different rendering engine from IE on Windows or Mozilla/Gecko on anything. So, currently we have to do extra testing on the Mac, but when Apple switches to a Gecko-based browser the Mac will be easier to support since we already support Gecko.

Go for it, Apple!
 
802.11b

Originally posted by peterjhill
The 802.11g spec is not set to be finalized until June of 2003. It is possible that apple will release a device based on the current draft, but that draft is subject to change prior to finalization. Hopefully to be fully compliant, any device would only require a firmware upgrade. 11g will be kind of silly in the home. Even computer to computer transfers rarely require more than 11 mbps.

802.11b is 5 mbps, despite the advertised 11mbps, btw.
 
Re: anyone?

Originally posted by sinbushar
anyone think there is a possibility of an iPhone?..and apple branded phone could do really well, syncing wiht itunes and ical and the address book so it'd be a phone/pda/mp3-player...jsut my thought

adel

Oh, jeez I hope so. I wonder who their carrier would be, though? I have Verizon Wireless, and I just have a feeling that Apple doesn't have any kind of deal with them...
 
Originally posted by dguisinger
Will you guys drop the i convention?
Not everything will have an i on the front, i am actually starting to hate all of those names 🙂

iMac, fine, thats cool
iBook...yup
iMovie, okay

iBrowse? no
iOffice? definately no

Apple isnt stupid...so I hope they dont rename everything they make under that convention.

No, apple won't drop the "i" naming, thank you very much!! They practically own the "i" at this point, a brilliant marketing coup if you ask me. I think they need to flood the market with more "i" names! I mean, some names like iDVD make no sense - what do DVDs have to do with the internet? It's just a marketing ploy, that's all...
 
Re: TV on your iPod!

Originally posted by pyrotoaster
I'm still not sure we're going to see these video iPods, although we could see another device or DLD with mp4 video.



I looked at the device he mentioned and it hit me. Imagine the implications of an mp4 movie device like an iPod II with something like El Gato's EyeTV!
Don't just watch home movies on your iPod, watch your favorite episode of Seinfeld or last night's CSI: Miami (why did Kim Delany leave?)! With an expansive 5, 10, or 20 GB hard drive and Firewire (2.0?) transfers, the possibilities would be limitless (assuming you have cable).
One thing. The screen would need to be at least an inch bigger.

I dunno about this whole portable video player thing. I mean, handheld TV's have been around since the 80's, and they never took the market by storm. And handheld TV's are a lot more useful, since you can actually watch live broadcasts of sports, news, etc..
 
Originally posted by j763
Apple will not step on Microsoft's toes.

Sure, it's Apple, but even they're not that insane.

Too late, Apple already has ads saying "Get out of your Windows world, it's not worth it". Keep in mind Explorer is free and Microsoft makes half its profits from Windows. In the grand scheme of things remember that Apple has 3% market share (and internet share, as has been verified by web server logs at major sites), so Microsoft wouldn't be that perturbed if Apple switched browsers.

I agree with you there are limits to what Apple can do though, Apple NEEDS Microsoft Office to run on OS X - any kind of switch campaign is dead without it...
 
So does anyone else thinking that Firewire II is going to be annouced or what?, maybe it's just so apperent that no one is mentioning it?

What about Apple's answer to to the Media Center PCs? a DVR w/ Apple branded software and hardware would be nice. It could carry the a single Gobi G3(for price and marketing), and would look like a DVD player or a thin desktop and could be used as either, price $699 though $1299 w/ superdrive. We could call it iHub or something, it would be cool and it would sell.

I don't see Apple marketing a browser at this MW, I think MS is going to be showcaseing IE 6 this week and it would be a very bad move to bring out an iBrowse or iWeb or the worst use of the 'i' analogy that I could think of...iNet. If Apple wants MS to continue the MacBU, this would not be the way to it.
 
Originally posted by Choppaface
oh great. my mom will probably want to use iphoto v2, but the drivers for her card reader will not work above 10.2... assuming that iphoto will only be for 10.2.2-3 and above, now doesn't that make everybody happy >_<

Try it without drivers. Most card readers use the industry standard for small removable media, it's a bit like firewire in that X has it all built-in so no drivers are needed.

If the card reader won't work, it probably isn't standards compliant. Your best bet is to eBay it and get one that is driverless.

HTH!
 
an iphone would just be the coolest thing out there. I jsut started to consider the sonyericcson t61i or wahtever it is but an iphone woudl definitly get my money.
 
oh a couple of things

(1)
I don't think now is the time for iBrowse/iWeb/whatever. Chimera isn't anywhere near feature complete, and I doubt Apple has had enough time internally to make that work. If they release it half-assed, they'll be raked over the coals for it. I think a likelier scenario is that we'll see that in the summer time frame.

(2)
It's not too hard to imagine what future iApps can be...after all, they're all programs for things people want to do with a computer. They have one for making movies, one for handling photos, one for listening to music, one for maintaining your schedule. We know they bought eMagic, so they will obviously make a low-end music-creation tool at some point. I don't think enough time has elapsed for that yet, though.

I also think it'd be likely to see a WYSIWYG Web editing tool at some point from Apple that jives with .Mac. I say this simply because it is something people want to do, and they already own the code for Claris Homepage.

If they release a lifestyle device capable of storing and playing MP4 video, then the iApp would obviously be some video equivalent to accompany that. I'd call it "iTuner", but that's too confusing. But, the point of it would obviously be to act like EyeTV or a TiVO, and capture live video into an MP4 stream and send it to the device. That way, if you go out drinking, you could record your favorite shows and watch them on the subway in the morning. I went out on a limb and predicted that on my Web site back in July, because I thought it was an obvious evolution for the iPod to take.

(3)
I'm sure you've all realized that the handwriting recognition built into Jaguar is completely useless. Well...duh...eventually they will release a product which actually makes use of it. The only argument appears to be whether it'll be a PDA or a tablet Mac. Like Think Secret says, I think a tablet Mac is a huge possibility; Apple's customers are creative-types, and all the designers and artists I know use wacom tablets. A tablet Mac would benefit them tremendously (I've been saying for years that Apple should create a laptop whose screen could flip all the way around so it could be used as a sketch pad. Maybe a tablet Mac would fit that bill...You could sit on your couch, away from your Mac, and work in comfort.)

(4)
FireWire 2 can't be released without some hardware release, so we won't see that. AirPort is the 100% obvious thing, I suppose. But, I don't think they will release AirPort 2 without releasing something that takes advantage of that speed...

(5)
As far as I know, no one has mentioned this on this site, but when Jobs talked Rendezvous before, he had other companies out there on stage (one was Philips and another was HP). So, I think it's VERY likely that we'll see HP demo a wireless 802.11 rendezvous-capable printer that requires no configuration. It'd also be likely to see Philips on stage announcing a new product that connects wirelessly or through ethernet and allows you to play your iTunes playlists right through your stereo. It could have a remote control that could flip to the next song and so forth on the Mac, through Rendezvous.

(6)
Oops...forgot to mention this. I highly doubt Apple will be making a phone. They've already trotted Sony/Ericsson out on stage, and Cingular, so it seems to me they won't provide the hardware (are they really going to compete directly with Sony 6 months after they announced a loose partnership with them?). Other Web sites have let slip (not from a rumor, but from PR copy), something called the "Mac to Mobile" system. (I'm surprised Arn didn't include that in his recap.) What is it? I don't know. But it seems to me that Apple will be providing the software, not the hardware, in this equation. My guess is that the iPhone trademark is not for a phone, but for an iApp to go along with some cool new Sony/Ericsson model. It'd probably do a host of phone/fax/etc functions...or maybe allow you to do voice over IP with your phone when you're at home, so you can save your minutes. If Apple *does" release an actual phone, I would wager a lot of money it'd just be them slapping their logo onto a Sony. So, the question is: what is "Mac to Mobile"...the name for the whole system, using iSync as a conduit, that lets you keep your phone synched with your Mac?
 
Why not 'Internet'? I say 'Internet'. 'Mail' - 'Address Book' - no reason to complicate things - let's just call the Apple browser 'Internet'.

I bet that if Apple could wipe the slate clean without worrying about marketing &c they would call iCal 'Calendar', iTunes 'Music', &c. That seems to be their new trend.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.