Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
70,494
42,191
Without much fanfare or anticipation, MacWorldExpo is kicking off tomorrow (July 12th, 2004) in Boston, MA.

This year's summer MacWorld Expo marks a move back to the Boston venue (from New York) which was surrounded in controversy ultimately leading to Apple's decision to not participate in the expo.

As a result, attention around the summer expo has been remarkably minimal.
 
Its a pity

I remember not long ago when we all useed to look forward to this event...

I wonder if apple are regretting not going, it may have been just enough more time from the WWDC to release the new iMac before the edu buying begins

Apple not being there has removed all relevance it once had, i can set up a mac Expo and not have apple come :p ;)
 
Low expectations....

- 10.4 already demoed
- Updated G5 already shown
- new displays already there
- iMacs not coming 'till September
- 10.3.5 dev seeds only just posted...
- Apple not being there... etc.

What is there to expect?

It will just be a "normal" Apple Expo like the London one.
 
Yea, I got an invitation to go to Mac World in the mail, I decided not to go because of the reasons listed below...

pitty... :(


MacsRgr8 said:
Low expectations....

- 10.4 already demoed
- Updated G5 already shown
- new displays already there
- iMacs not coming 'till September
- 10.3.5 dev seeds only just posted...
- Apple not being there... etc.

What is there to expect?

It will just be a "normal" Apple Expo like the London one.
 
shouldn't it be mandatory for apple to be there? at least have a stand for chrissakes!

The organisers should have even paid for apple to be there...

they would have made it up with increased participation from 3rd parties.
 
It is so sad. So very sad. They should have left the name as "Creative Pro" just so that such a pitiful expo will not be associated with the MacWorld moniker.

No offense to anyone attending the show, I hope you have a wonderful time regardless of the lackluster expectations.
 
I completely forgot about this event, and I guess that's with good reason. Due to the circumstances, I might as well just set up a Mac expo in my basement and demo some stuff and it would be about the same. ;) I always like kepeing up on Apple-related events and hearing the latest and greatest news, but I just can't get excited about this expo anymore...
 
I'm very much looking froward to MacWorld Boston. Apple should feel ashamed for not participating.

When the Macworld Conference & Expo opens tomorrow at the new Boston Convention & Exhibition Center, the 10,000 computer geeks expected to attend will have the run of the massive South Boston meeting hall.

Well, sort of.

While the Macworlders grab their name tags and head for the center's sprawling exhibit floor, about 1,200 others will be attending a corporate meeting sponsored by German software maker SAP in the meeting rooms upstairs. And chances are that those attending one convention will never encounter participants from the other.

For the convention center, Macworld is the first high-profile show. But the event represents more than an opening; it marks a shift in strategy.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/07/11/a_break_with_convention/
 
"Say no" advertisement?

If you saw the guys photos from the link in the original story, there is an advertising truck with a huge sight "Say no to Macworld" and to voice your complains, call 617-954-2000 which is the number to the convention center. The ad also says "Save our Jobs" and "Say no to a company that supports outsourcing U.S. jobs".

What are they talking about?
 
amichalo said:
If you saw the guys photos from the link in the original story, there is an advertising truck with a huge sight "Say no to Macworld" and to voice your complains, call 617-954-2000 which is the number to the convention center. The ad also says "Save our Jobs" and "Say no to a company that supports outsourcing U.S. jobs".

What are they talking about?

Well, I'm not sure if they are referring to IDG (the company that owns Macworld) or Apple itself. I know for a fact that Apple is outsourcing at an increasing rate, and I would wager that IDG is doing the same.

I really think Apple is messing up by jumping on the outsourcing bandwagon. The other guys do it so they can sell their junky peecees for 500 bucks, but Apple doesn't play that game. I think a much better strategy would be to keep the jobs in the US and use it as a selling point: "You pay a little more for our products because we pay American workers to assemble and service them."

Outsourcing is becoming a bigger and bigger deal every day, and I imagine that before long, it will start to be a major factor in people's purchasing decisions here in the US.
 
wdlove said:
I'm very much looking froward to MacWorld Boston. Apple should feel ashamed for not participating.

When the Macworld Conference & Expo opens tomorrow at the new Boston Convention & Exhibition Center, the 10,000 computer geeks expected to attend will have the run of the massive South Boston meeting hall.

Well, sort of.

While the Macworlders grab their name tags and head for the center's sprawling exhibit floor, about 1,200 others will be attending a corporate meeting sponsored by German software maker SAP in the meeting rooms upstairs. And chances are that those attending one convention will never encounter participants from the other.

For the convention center, Macworld is the first high-profile show. But the event represents more than an opening; it marks a shift in strategy.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/07/11/a_break_with_convention/

I think you're missing (or choosing to ignore) Apple's point. Boston is a great city. Beautiful architecture, rich history, well educated, etc - I'm not knocking Boston.

But it is not New York.

NYC is as much a city of the world as it is a city of the US. It is a global player that attracts global attention like no other city in the US. It is also the communications capital of the US. If you want every major publication to attend an event, you hold it in NYC.

I don't think Apple was blind to the value Macworld could have for them in Boston, they just knew that it was less valuable than NYC, and so they used the best ammo they had to get it moved back.

In all honesty, I think they figured Macworld would concede and move the show. And, chances are, they will for next year.
 
SuperChuck said:
Outsourcing is becoming a bigger and bigger deal every day, and I imagine that before long, it will start to be a major factor in people's purchasing decisions here in the US.

No.

Predictions of American Fascism is nothing to base Apple’s strategy on.
 
Worth Going?

I live in Hartford so it wouldn't be too difficult for me to get to Boston. I've always wanted to go to a big show in NY but I've never been able to go to one before. I'm not sure I want to take a day off work and get a train from New Haven. I've heard that it will be such a small show, is it going to be worth the effort?
 
To the off topic things......

Sorry. There ARE jobs in America. You can MOVE somewhere besides your current location you know. Also, don't believe Joh Kerry. Read mor eand you will find out while IT lost alot of jobs, they also gained some too. The most vocal opponents seem to be the ones who all quit college due to .com pipe dreams. That said, I have no clue what that sign in those picture about. Can it be about Apple? Maybe but I doubt it since they aren't there. IDG? Possibly as they do print alot of magazines.


That said, I would go to MacWorld if I had the bucks to go. Even without Apple going, it still sounds like a great show.

As far as why is Apple not going.....to me this sounds like Steve Jobs all the way. It is also my most frustrating thing about him. The man is a genius in a lot of things, but his temper is well known. Sometimes this makes Apple sound like a small child whining and complaining. I ain't saying they should not try for the best locations, but they should at least be at MacWorld Boston. Apple needs to grow up a little bit and stop acting like a child and the same thing goes for some of the Apple Zealots. I love my Mac and will continue to buy them, but I am sick and tired of seeing the whining about no G5 Powerbooks, no 3.Ghz G5 and bla this and bladeblah that. Apple still is doing a awesome job.
 
Gabriel said:
I live in Hartford so it wouldn't be too difficult for me to get to Boston. I've always wanted to go to a big show in NY but I've never been able to go to one before. I'm not sure I want to take a day off work and get a train from New Haven. I've heard that it will be such a small show, is it going to be worth the effort?
They will have 2.5GHz G5s there, if that helps.
 
gorkonapple said:
Also, don't believe Joh Kerry. Read mor eand you will find out while IT lost alot of jobs, they also gained some too.

Well, which one is it? Did IT lose or gain jobs?

Also, your opinion would probably carry more weight if every third word wasn't misspelled. :rolleyes:
 
When was the last time you bought anything from Apple that was made in the USA? Not for years...

Apple could care less about people. They want money. If anything, I can see Apple as being more of a whorish monster than Microsoft if it ever gets to be the majority player in the computer/OS market.
 
SuperChuck said:
Well, I'm not sure if they are referring to IDG (the company that owns Macworld) or Apple itself. I know for a fact that Apple is outsourcing at an increasing rate, and I would wager that IDG is doing the same.

I really think Apple is messing up by jumping on the outsourcing bandwagon. The other guys do it so they can sell their junky peecees for 500 bucks, but Apple doesn't play that game. I think a much better strategy would be to keep the jobs in the US and use it as a selling point: "You pay a little more for our products because we pay American workers to assemble and service them."

Outsourcing is becoming a bigger and bigger deal every day, and I imagine that before long, it will start to be a major factor in people's purchasing decisions here in the US.
Global economy - if all of your competitors are doing it, you can only survive so long while you shareholders whine about your higher costs.
 
eric_n_dfw said:
Global economy - if all of your competitors are doing it, you can only survive so long while you shareholders whine about your higher costs.

BINGO !!! Well stated... We've witnessed an economic change in our lifetime, & that's not always an easy thing to deal with- but no change is ever easy... There's jobs out there- they're just different than what we're used to... But the money is still there- just have to go find a way to get it... I'm not a fan of outsourcing, but as a small business owner I guess I understand it- even though I don't practice it... I respect peoples rights to protest about it, I just don't quite understand why anyone would waste valuable time doing it... Times are changing & that time could be spent preparing yourself, your family, & your business (if applicable) for the future... I guess people are trying to bring attention to the outsourcing shift that's been occuring for the past several years- but is there really anyone out there who isn't aware of it ?...
 
Well, I'll certainly be going, if for nothing more than to check out the brand new convention center and to check out the new release of sketch up (Great app BTW...)

In any case, I'm going because I've gone for... well, as long as I can remember (And I'm only 16). The last few years in New York were fun; they served as an excuse to get my family down to the big apple. We even brought our boat and got a slip on the hudson across from the javits center-- But the years in boston before that were even better.

Does anyone remember power computing's "We're fighting back for the Mac!" ad campaign when they were the first to release 200MHz+ computers? Anyone who was at MacWorld that year certainly would: Power Computing had a bungee jumping tower over Boston harbor that anyone who had the guts could take a leap from. Those were the glory days of MacWorld.


MacWorld's following used to be HUUUGE; now it is a mere blip on the radar screen. Ever since apple announced it wouldn't be attending any longer come MW 2004 in Boston, the feeling that once came with MacWorld came no longer. Even attendance numbers, by both exhibitors as well as people, were down at last years MW NY. Walking around the floor just didn't feel like it used to.

Apple's decision to try and sway product releases away from conventions/expos, is, in my opinion, another big mistake. Expos, especially one's like macworld, served as a great marketing tool, a marketplace to introduce new computing revolutions to the masses. By moving more and more releases to arbitrary dates and/or specialty conferences like WWDC, Apple has only served to loose some of the market share and publicity it could have gained.

While I love Apple, and I love Jobs, I can't say that I agree with everything they do. I see no reason why they couldn't at least attend MacWorld, I mean sheesh, they conference is NAMED after them and you'd think they'd at least want to make an appearance...

Well, enough ranting for me... ....Who know's, maybe Apple will have a suprise for me after all this year... :rolleyes:
 
New York

At a time when NYC needs it the most, IDG made a boneheaded choice by deciding to move Macworld back to Boston. Sort of reminds me of how little the federal government is doing to help make NYC more secure, even as the Republicans use a local tragedy as the backdrop for their convention.
 
AMPrkm said:
At a time when NYC needs it the most, IDG made a boneheaded choice by deciding to move Macworld back to Boston. Sort of reminds me of how little the federal government is doing to help make NYC more secure, even as the Republicans use a local tragedy as the backdrop for their convention.

I couldn't have said it better myself.
 
AMPrkm said:
At a time when NYC needs it the most, IDG made a boneheaded choice by deciding to move Macworld back to Boston. Sort of reminds me of how little the federal government is doing to help make NYC more secure, even as the Republicans use a local tragedy as the backdrop for their convention.

The Republicans chose it for the very same reasons mentioned above. It is a World Class city. Everything is there, the Democrats made a big mistake by not going there also. With the high security and construction costs, money could have been saved on both sides. A little common sense would have gone a long way. It seems that there is plenty of arrogance on both sides when it comes to using the Boston venue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.