Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by ZildjianKX
Bring on the speedbubmps so the DP 2.0 owners can feel like the SP 1.8 owners :)

Be prepared to have a 2 month wait to get your powermac though...

Actually, the dual 2.0 owners will feel like 1.6 owners :)
 
Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
IMO all the iLife apps are slow except iTunes. iTunes is great.

iPhoto is quite slow but I currently only have 200 photos and they display in about 1 second on my PB 12" 1GHz. It's painfully slow to resize the window though. iMovie is THE WORST! I haven't played with it much because I got Final Cut Express with my Mac (and love it) and this is much faster, even when I'm depriving it currently of RAM (I only have 256MB). iDVD is not too slow but it hogs RAM. This is expected because of the large file sizes etc.

I don't know how much faster they are in Panther though... Will find out tomorrow hopefully!
You need more memory! Don't say the iApps are slow if you're only running 256 MB... Put at least 512 in there then tell me if it's still slow. I have a 1.25 Ghz 15" AlBook with 1GB of RAM, and all the iApps are very fast.
 
Re: Shooting themselves in the foot (again)...

Originally posted by jayscheuerle
If Apple's not releasing an inexpensive headless by now (in time for the holiday season), they shouldn't even bother...

well... maybe not, considering the buggy releases lately, it might not be such a great idea to release a NEW product that will be in the hands of so many switchers in its first revision. Release it after Christmas, and you miss the holiday buying, but you get to revise and establish the product a few times before it's on everybody's list for next year.

P.S. - I understand that .0 releases are inevitably buggy, this is not a complaint, but most average computer users won't be particularly forgiving.
 
I have a feeling that we won't see 2.5ghz G5s, I think like a 2.33 or something, but I think that the 2.5 isn't stable enough. I bet we'll see 2.5 in april, and then 3ghz in late July/August
 
Horse Hockey !!

Originally posted by illumin8
The problem preventing a 1U G5 XServe is the same problem preventing a G5 PowerBook: heat!

That's complete nonsense.

IBM/Dell/HP et al. are putting 3.2 GHz dual CPU Xeons in 1U boxes (e.g. http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl360/index.html) A 3 GHz Xeon generates much more heat than a 2 GHz G5....

IBM is putting two 3.2 GHz Xeons in a 0.5U blade (see http://www-132.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/s...Id=2575417&storeId=1&catalogId=-840&langId=-1), and is putting two 1.6 GHz PPC970 chips in the same form factor 0.5U Blade (http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/bladecenter/js20/more_info.html)

Rackmount systems are intended for computer rooms - it doesn't matter if the fans make a bit of noise.

The large fans on the Powermac G5 are there for quietness - not because it generates a huge amount of heat!
 
all right my guess . . .

This is just my hypothesis on what will be released:

1: Power Mac G5 updates (gotta hit the 3.0 soon)
2. 20th anniversary mac (BRING BACK THE CUBE!)
3. Update the iLife apps
4. The new office suite (let's get Microsoft's teeth out of Mac forever!)

As much as I expect the X-serves and LCDs to be upgraded soon I'm not sure if they seem like MWSF products, or the X-Serve doesn't. I think the X-serve will be a Feb. release and the LCDs have 50/50 chance of seeing the light of day at MWSF, if not, Feb with the X-Serves.

Well, yeah . . .this seems like the most logical products to me. Although that mac powered rocket ship would be cool . . .
 
Originally posted by DGFan
Don't complain about the software if you are using a computer with too little RAM. 512MB is the absolute minimum. 1GB is preferred (I have 1.5GB on my dual 867 and it's a speedy little bugger).
I know this will help but my point is, why should iMovie and iPhoto be slower than Final Cut Express and Photoshop Elements with the same amount of RAM?

I'm just waiting for the 512MB RAM module at crucial to drop below its current £79 and I'll be there.
 
Originally posted by illumin8
You need more memory! Don't say the iApps are slow if you're only running 256 MB... Put at least 512 in there then tell me if it's still slow. I have a 1.25 Ghz 15" AlBook with 1GB of RAM, and all the iApps are very fast.

I have over 512 MB of RAM and iPhoto is still a dog with over 1200 photos and counting. This app needs to be reworked to handle large libraries better.
 
Re: Re: Re: Interesting quote I found

Originally posted by illumin8
Not only that, he buys book stands at Walmart and sells them as "laptop stands" for about 3 times their value. As in all things, caveat emptor.

Have you ever bought a can of Coke or Pepsi? Or eaten in a restaurant? Then you are paying A LOT more than 3X cost. Adding ~65% to cost is not a shady practice.
 
Originally posted by the_mole1314
I have a feeling that we won't see 2.5ghz G5s, I think like a 2.33 or something, but I think that the 2.5 isn't stable enough. I bet we'll see 2.5 in april, and then 3ghz in late July/August
Any you're basing this on? You've received engineering samples of the faster 970s?

I think that no-one outside of IBM or Apple's G5 Engineering group knows how stable the 970 is at any given clock speed.

jmho
 
Re: Interesting quote I found

Originally posted by yoman
Sounds interesting I don't know if this guy is for real but he seems to know what he's talking about. Hmmmm...

Uhm... no - that is Jack Campbell of MacTable, MacMice, MacWhispers fame. I wouldn't pay any attention to what he says.
 
Originally posted by Awimoway
Well at least we didn't waste any time making a list of things no MWSF could ever live up to, thus ensuring our utter disappointment when the day arrives. You only left out iWalk, G5 PowerBooks, and Mac-powered rocketships to the next lunar exploration. :rolleyes:

First, everything I've talked about have been rumored or actually leaked out of Apple. It's been in a many mags and many websites.

Will they all appear at the showing maybe not. Will they happen this yr? I would say yes.

Will I be disappointed like most of you think? No, because I only want to see a good event. Nothing more and nothing less.
 
Originally posted by illumin8
You need more memory! Don't say the iApps are slow if you're only running 256 MB... Put at least 512 in there then tell me if it's still slow. I have a 1.25 Ghz 15" AlBook with 1GB of RAM, and all the iApps are very fast.

I have only 512 in my 15 TiBook and all my iApps are fast. I'm going to upgrade to 1GB soon.
 
Originally posted by illumin8
You need more memory! Don't say the iApps are slow if you're only running 256 MB... Put at least 512 in there then tell me if it's still slow. I have a 1.25 Ghz 15" AlBook with 1GB of RAM, and all the iApps are very fast.

Sorry buddy, but I have 896MB of RAM. iPhoto slows down a lot when you get up to around 1000 photos. And I am definitely not a "pro user" - you can get to 1000 photos pretty quickly.
 
Good, Better, Best MWSF

I feel like speculating, so here is my good, better, best (best would be awesome, but is least likely to happen =p)

Good
PowerMac G5 speed bump, new systems are:
Dual 1.8/512MB/200GB/64MB Radeon 9600
Dual 2.2/1GB/250GB/64MB Radeon 9600
Dual 2.5/1GB/250GB/128MB Radeon 9800
BTO 256MB Radeon 9800, all systems with PCI-X motherboards.

G5 Xserve, 1U config, 1x or 2x 2.2Ghz G5s, 4 independent SATA disk controllers with 250+GB SATA drives. 1AGP/PCI and 2 PCI-X slots

Price drop current LCDs.

Better
G5 Xserve is 1x or 2x 2.5Ghz G5s
3U Xserve Blade edition. Lots of redundancies, etc. Dunno how many blades would be practical for a 3U box, but I can see each blade as single/dual 1.6 G5s (it's a blade server, want more power, put in another blade dammit =p).
G5 iMac. Same monitor sizes as now, but with 1.6 & 1.8Ghz G5s, nVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra video, and 120 GB HD.

New LCDs.

iPod $50 cut across the board.

Best
Reborn Cube, 2.0 Ghz G5, 64MB Radeon 9600 video, 160 SATA HD, couple hundred less than low-end PowerMac G5.

20th Anniversary Macintosh
2.5 Ghz G5, 2x250GB SATA HD, 256MB Radeon 9800 graphics, 2GB RAM standard (expandable up to 8GB). Comes with a special edition LCD, largest size Apple's offering. Wireless KB/Mouse, built in iSight. Bluetooth/Airport Extreme. 5.1 speaker system. Complimentary AppleCare. Only $7K =).

iPod $100 cut across the board. $149 5GB iPod in current form factor.

Best would certainly be a cool MWSF though I think =).
 
Originally posted by ffakr
Any you're basing this on? You've received engineering samples of the faster 970s?

I think that no-one outside of IBM or Apple's G5 Engineering group knows how stable the 970 is at any given clock speed.

jmho

Just my own opinion, I really don't know about that.
 
Originally posted by mrsebastian
what is the point of metioning the cube at the end of the article? it's f#@king dead!

You obviously haven't been reading MacRumsors enough. :p There have been plenty of rumors as of late about Apple pulling a Phoenix with their cube form. I personally don't like it but hey.
*shrugs* Never say never when it comes to Apple and Jobs freakish obsession with things.
 
Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
I know this will help but my point is, why should iMovie and iPhoto be slower than Final Cut Express and Photoshop Elements with the same amount of RAM?

I'm just waiting for the 512MB RAM module at crucial to drop below its current £79 and I'll be there.

I can't answer that with respect to iMovie and FCE. As for PE and iPhoto, they do different things. iPhoto is a browser too and it's probably the case that caching that much information about each image and the thumbnails was filling up a lot of RAM. PE doesn't need to do that normally.

Plus, iMovie and iPhoto are "free" (sort of) so I wouldn't expect the same polish and under-the-hood tinkering to squeeze out every ounce of speed. FCE and PE are stripped down versions of expensive software so it doesn't surprise me that their core functions are fast.
 
Originally posted by DGFan


Plus, iMovie and iPhoto are "free" (sort of) so I wouldn't expect the same polish and under-the-hood tinkering to squeeze out every ounce of speed. FCE and PE are stripped down versions of expensive software so it doesn't surprise me that their core functions are fast.


Free doesn't mean an app has to be cheap. Microsoft pulls this kind of crap all the time with crappy products like Movie Maker or MS Paint. The iLife apps are the cornerstone of the Mac. Every time you hear Mac users singing the praises of Apple its because of the OS X and iLife. (Or more specifically iTunes. Why should one app be so much better then the rest of them?) Its what makes a Mac a Mac right? I personally am a shutterbug and have close to 4,000 pictures adding about 30-100 pictures to my collection a month. If, more like when, I get a Mac I want that functionality that Mac is supposedly synonymous for. I know 3 Mac users. All three don’t even bother with iPhoto. What’s the point of these apps if they aren’t going to be the best of breed? Again behavior I expect from Microsoft NOT Apple.
 
Apple can't afford to wait

Some people (a small minority to be sure) here have commented that Apple doesn't really need to upgrade their systems at MWSF (or thereabouts). Well, Intel is apparently releasing Prescott soon after (starting at 3.4GHz)

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/34355.html

Apple needs to be delivering at least a 2.4GHz machine by that time to stay in the ballpark.
 
Re: An expandable, available dual is needed - perhaps more than a quad

Originally posted by AidenShaw
A quad would be a nice addition - but quads are usually quite a bit more expensive per CPU than duals.

A dual 3U is still needed - for expandability and availability, not as much for raw power. Use the Xserve chassis form factor as a start, have 7 disks, dual CPU, ECC memory, redundant power, 5 PCI-X slots....

Just as the Xserve 1U was a nice system to start with, a 3U dualie would be a good next step. Don't force people who need a couple of more PCI-X slots to pay for a quad.

They should not have to. The 3U should be quad processor capable with options to start with one, two or four processors and increase as need be. Other server companies offer that as standard fare. I think Apple will have to do the same to compete in the enterprise space.
 
Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
I know this will help but my point is, why should iMovie and iPhoto be slower than Final Cut Express and Photoshop Elements with the same amount of RAM?

Well, it wouldn't surprise me if Apple were throttling the free iApps to make the pay-for applications appear to be worth the money; it wouldn't be the first time.
 
Originally posted by ITR 81
First, everything I've talked about have been rumored or actually leaked out of Apple. It's been in a many mags and many websites. Will they all appear at the showing maybe not. Will they happen this yr? I would say yes.

Anyone can start a rumor. We can't be sure everything will appear. Video iPod? Please.

Will I be disappointed like most of you think? No, because I only want to see a good event. Nothing more and nothing less.

Well, good. I just know that in my experience, no MWSF ever lives up to the unrealistic set of expectations we place on Apple. It gets old. I am not an apologist for Apple, but I'm even less of one for the fanboys who expect Apple to repeal the law of gravity andf make gold nuggets spew out of their G5 cheese graters. Hell, even if everything on your list is destined to happen, there wouldn't be time enough in the keynote to present all of it. Remember you originally said you "expect" all of these things at MWSF.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.