2A Batterie said:
I disagree. There are many other ways to communicate right/wrong aside from striking a child. I do not believe hitting a child will produce positive results. I'm curious to know what you, and others who believe in corporal punishment, believe that striking a child accomplishes.
Ok, I've been researching the Mongols way too much, but it's like the Mongols. I know that once I was spanked a few times, I had a fear of doing wrong. I knew that if I did something that my parents thought was wrong (or, really, what was wrong), I'd be fetching a belt in no time.
What I'm trying to say is that it's a punishment. In my parents disciplining me through "striking" (I think that's a bit harsh), they were able to display to me right and wrong, trigger a fear of doing wrong, and being able to get it out of the way. Once my punishment was served, all was well again.
In the end, not to sound boastful or anything, but I'm a well respected person who's growing up to be a very calm and not violent person. Something went right in my child hood, and I think that being "stricken" was right.
But there's another side to that. My parents knew what they were doing, and didn't do it out of anger. Some parents punish their kids out of anger, which can hurt both of them, especially the kid. There's always a few sides to an idea, and this is where the "stricking" of a child can go wrong.
-Chase