Might want to avoid his other apps too
8:52PM EST - Still available on Peru App Store
View attachment 599190
DESPITE news it had been withdrawn from App Store, I just looked from in Australia and it's still there
-- full name "Who Viewed Your Profile - InstaAgent" --
![]()
That's not the malicious app - the malicious one just used a similar name8:52PM EST - Still available on Peru App Store
View attachment 599190
Might want to read the O.P. ...I just wonder what's happened in Google Play Store, any news? Is the apps has been remove also? Or the app was fine there, the developer doesn't put malware on Play Store version only he add it on iOS.
So true. Look how we are struggling to get our app to App Store. In review for more than 8 days. Still in review.We are getting lots of fake apps into the AppStore while lots of good apps are rejected because some silly thing that no one cares.
They already take 1-2 weeks. For no apparent reason : https://00f.net/2010/10/11/appstore-review-process/
Before you say "this thing is 5 years old", it was exactly the same for the last app I published, 4 months ago : a whooping 3 minutes review on an app that took over 2 months to develop. They didn't even test most of the features.
On the other hand, network requests are encrypted by Apple's libraries; it wouldn't be too difficult for Apple to substitute a different library during the review that allows Apple to read everything (which would be legitimate, because it would only be the information of the reviewer that could be read).
After they remove this crap, they should remove instagram while they're at it.
What's wrong with Grindr?Why? What's wrong with Snapchat and Yik Yak? They should remove Grindr and Facebook.
Like a government agency, Apple app approval seems to be more 'check the box and make sure the form looks good' rather than actually looking at the software itself.slipped it past the monitors eh? sounds like they need some better app approvers
Apple should fire some of its California retail employees who were participating in that lawsuit against it, and hire more people for the App Review department instead.
That's such a depressing attitude.
You're right. They need MORE employees and a much more thorough testing process. There should be an extensive checklist of tasks that a reviewer has to perform (check app code for malicious code, spam, etc.) before green-lighting a potential app. The reviewer should have to sign off on every item of the checklist. Then the app should not be approved yet--it has to go to that reviewer's supervisor who must ensure (either by random checks, or by double-checking every item on the checklist) that the process has been correctly performed. Both employees need to attach their initials to the app review log (I'm assuming something like this is already happening).You realise the apps were reviewed? Maybe just fire everyone !!!
You're right. They need MORE employees and a much more thorough testing process. There should be an extensive checklist of tasks that a reviewer has to perform (check app code for malicious code, spam, etc.) before green-lighting a potential app. The reviewer should have to sign off on every item of the checklist. Then the app should not be approved yet--it has to go to that reviewer's supervisor who must ensure (either by random checks, or by double-checking every item on the checklist) that the process has been correctly performed. Both employees need to attach their initials to the app review log (I'm assuming something like this is already happening).
Then, accountability. Three strikes and you're out for these employees. Heck, ONE strike in the case of apps which can potentially cause serious damage or theft of data!