What the hell are you talking about?So, your ok with being held against your will, if harm might come to the perpetrator??
This appears on the cusp of kidnapping.
What the hell are you talking about?So, your ok with being held against your will, if harm might come to the perpetrator??
This appears on the cusp of kidnapping.
What the hell are you talking about?
As so many other posters, the fact is that you have no idea what transpired. The driver is prima facie guilty of attempted murder. Nothing more needs to be said. I do not understand the number of otherwise reasonable people here who are blaming the victim.
A problem. He should have called the police if there was no other way to extricate himself. Driving at 100mph with someone clinging to the front of the car is simply not an acceptable option.She is on the hood, and you are prevented from moving.
What the Hell do you call that??
Again, he should have called the police. What should she be charged with? Is she or is she not the victim of attempted murder?Both should be thrown in jail and left to rot.
She is on the hood, and you are prevented from moving.
What the Hell do you call that??
A problem. He should have called the police if there was no other way to extricate himself.
Driving at 100mph with someone clinging to the front of the car is simply not an acceptable option.
An inconvenience.![]()
A sensible suggestion. Well done. You can do it.True, in the absence of a phone, I would have driven very slowly to a police station, and ask for her to be removed.
Again, he should have called the police. What should she be charged with? Is she or is she not the victim of attempted murder?
Both should be thrown in jail and left to rot. Unfortunately there's no law against stupid so only the guy will get his day in court.
Because whether she made a bad decision or not is beside the question. If we were all liable to prosecution for bad decisions, there would be nobody left to pass judgement.Why ask me something I've already answered?
Because whether she made a bad decision or not is beside the question. If we were all liable to prosecution for bad decisions, there would be nobody left to pass judgement.
That is utterly ridiculous.That's my point really, society has done away with personal responsibility. Prosecution should not even come into this. She made a bad judgement call and if she was to die because of it, she should be sole responsible. She's a victim of her own actions.
That is utterly ridiculous.
You keep banging on about personal responsibility, yet now you seem to want to absolve the lunatic who tried to kill his wife of any responsibility at all. He is the one who tried to kill her. That she put herself in danger by underestimating his lunacy is a mistake, not a crime.
He is the one who tried to kill her.
You read in my comments what you want, I clearly stated that both parties are at fault. I don't recognize the "victim" angle on the woman's side, it doesn't mean I don't think the guy was in the right either. Both can be wrong (novel concept, I know).
There is no equivalence. Her choices did not endanger his life in any way.Under the circumstances, if he was really trying to kill her, I think he would have succeeded.
There is no equivalence. Her choices did not endanger his life in any way.
Speak for yourself. You clearly stated that she should bear sole responsibility.You look for equivalence where we have stated none. We have simply stated that her choices endangered her own life. She is a victim of herself. That is our only point.
The man was just sent to prison for five years.
A satisfactory result, I think.The man was just sent to prison for five years.
No one got hurt, did they?A problem. He should have called the police if there was no other way to extricate himself. Driving at 100mph with someone clinging to the front of the car is simply not an acceptable option.
Again, he should have called the police. What should she be charged with? Is she or is she not the victim of attempted murder?
A very silly response.