I personally agree with the judge's ruling.
I obviously wasn't there, but when they claim "if the illness was grave enough" then I assume if he was bleeding profusely then they'd act upon it in a different fashion.
Going from what is in the article in itself, things like "spots of blood" make me assume he's not really gushing any bodily fluids profusely.
Think about it. Most people freak when someone is losing a moderate amount of blood, and I assume flight attendants would to. Perhaps he was bleeding a bit, but I doubt he was in absolute danger.
I understand the need for proper medical attention, but there has to be a line somewhere. The man was clearly alert, standing, and while frightened, I doubt he was showing signs of dying any moment.
I obviously wasn't there, but when they claim "if the illness was grave enough" then I assume if he was bleeding profusely then they'd act upon it in a different fashion.
Going from what is in the article in itself, things like "spots of blood" make me assume he's not really gushing any bodily fluids profusely.
Think about it. Most people freak when someone is losing a moderate amount of blood, and I assume flight attendants would to. Perhaps he was bleeding a bit, but I doubt he was in absolute danger.
I understand the need for proper medical attention, but there has to be a line somewhere. The man was clearly alert, standing, and while frightened, I doubt he was showing signs of dying any moment.
