I've been saying this in forums now for awhile, and I strongly believe that apple will remove the 17" macbook pro from the lineup. Either this revision, or next. They already have an 11.6" macbook air now. People want smaller and more portable computers nowadays, so I think apple will move in that direction.
a 15" macbook pro with 1920x1200 would be perfect. Remove the optical drive, add SSD and you already saved yourself enough space for a decent i7, a better dedicated GPU and more battery life.
I have a 17" MBP, and while it is good for a desktop replacement, it's not something you want to carry around campus 8 hours a day, and I strongly think people would be much better carrying around a 13" and plugging it into a 27" at home.
I disagree. I have a 15" MBP, and I want a 17" MBP soon. I'm 6' 3", built like a straw, and don't have a problem carrying around an extra pound for some 17" bliss.
And who cares about all this 1600x900 and 2048x1536 screen resolution crap. All resolutions these days suck. I want a 13" Macbook Air with 2560x1600 and a 30" Cinema display with 7680x4800. I could just imagine that...
Introducing, the new 30" Apple Cinema Display.
Starting at a fantastic price of just $15,999 inc GST.
With the new 30" Apple Cinema Display, you can see retina detail in a display that offers so many pixels, not only will you require 20/20 vision at 1/2 inch from the screen just to read standard webpage text, but you will also require not one, but FOUR $1999 each Nvidia Quadro FX5800 GPU's in SLI to enjoy this incredible display in it's full native resolution of 7680x4800.
The new 30" Retina Cinema Display. Only from Apple.
Think different!
I do agree with this. 1920x1200 I think is fine how it is. The higher the pixel count goes, the more the GPU has to work to drive it, and the battery life decreases.
I think it's amusing that we (forum members) always have to argue about something. If it's not about ODDs, it's about aspect ratios. How stupid is that???