Thoughtful article here:
https://marco.org/2017/04/15/mac-pro-audacity-of-yes
I especially like the following section, which mirrors much of the debate here on MR.
https://marco.org/2017/04/15/mac-pro-audacity-of-yes
I especially like the following section, which mirrors much of the debate here on MR.
if you ask Mac Pro customers what they need and want, there’s very little overlap:
The requirements are all over the map, but most pro users seem to agree on the core principles of an ideal Mac Pro, none of which include size or minimalism:
- Video creators need as many CPU cores as possible, one or two very fast GPUs with support for cutting-edge video output resolutions (like 8K today), PCIe capture, massive amounts of storage, and the most external peripheral bandwidth possible.
- Audio creators need fast single-core CPU performance, low-latency PCIe/Thunderbolt interfaces, rock-solid USB buses, ECC RAM for stability, and reliable silence regardless of load. (Many also use the optical audio inputs and outputs, and would appreciate the return of the line-in jack.)
- Photographers need tons of CPU cores, tons of storage, a lot of RAM, and the biggest and best single displays.
- Software developers, which Federighi called out in the briefing this month as possibly the largest part of Apple’s “pro” audience, need tons of CPU cores, the fastest storage possible, tons of RAM, tons of USB ports, and multiple big displays, but hardly any GPU power — unless they’re developing games or VR, in which case, they need the most GPU power possible.
- Mac gamers need a high-speed/low-core-count CPU, the best single gaming GPU possible, and VR hardware support.
- Budget-conscious PC builders need as many PC-standard components and interfaces as possible to maximize potential for upgrades, repairs, and expansion down the road.
- And more, and more…
Or, to distill the requirements down to a single word:
- More internal capacity is better.
- Each component should have a reasonably priced base option, but offer the ability to configure up to the best technology on the market.
- It needs to accommodate a wide variety of needs, some of which Apple won’t offer, and some of which may require future upgrades.
- Versatility.