I purchased a 2017 Mazda CX-5, and every single Mazda salesperson had been told that for sure we'd have Apple CarPlay available for our cars as a firmware update by fall 2017. Here we are six months past that deadline, and they are just now adding it to select new models.
I for one am delighted with my car, but it was inexcusable that Apple CarPlay has taken so long to implement, and we were lied to about upcoming availability. I have to say the lies they told to help induce a sale, make me very wary of trusting them again.
Come on Mazda, get this done, honor your promises. Roll out the firmware ASAP. Or you won't be getting a repeat customer.
[doublepost=1522349368][/doublepost]
I drive a 2017 Mazda CX5 and it is a great value vehicle
I really have no desire for Car Play though, so lack of it never factored in my car choice
If it was retro to the 2017, I might try it out, but honestly it doesn't have any real appeal to me
I drive a lot of rental cars because my job involved a great deal of travel. I have to say, once you're used to having it, you really miss it when you don't. It is an exceptionally nice feature to have. And I am angry that Mazda totally lied about implementing it for so long.
When I pick out my rental car, I deliberately gravitate towards models that have it. Especially if it doesn't have navigation.
[doublepost=1522349929][/doublepost]
The CX-5 was on the short list to replace my Mazda3 when it was hit and totaled, but I wanted CarPlay, so I ruled it out. I ended up going with a Honda CR-V. Knowing what I know now about both CarPlay and the CR-V, I wish I would have gone with the CX-5. It was a hell of a lot more fun to drive than the milquetoast CR-V and CarPlay isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.
I was really close on the CR-V and the CX-5. I almost went with the Honda, but fortunately for me, when two dealers owned by the same people, on the same street, priced a lease on both vehicles at identical prices point, the Honda was more than $100 a month more expensive. So I passed, and am so glad because the CX-5 is way better, despite Mazda lying about CarPlay.
I think it was a great choice for Mazda to go to a normally aspirated engine and traditional gearbox over tiny turbo and CVT. The Honda may be a shade faster and more fuel efficient on paper. But if you try and use that speed and acceleration, you'll have to deal with that whiney annoying engine/gearbox, and if you're engaging that turbo, you can kiss those great fuel numbers goodbye.
It's really the new generation car con. Tiny turbo / CVT engines combinations seem like they would be a good deal in terms of 0-60 and MPG. But in real life, they are annoying to drive, and unless you drive like a saint, you won't even come close to posted EPA figures.