Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That said, i have always used a hidden dock on the left side.
This is my practice, as well, as it has been on my old MB and 13" MBP. I wouldn't keep a dock unhidden on a portable, and certainly not on the bottom.

Great thread; I agree with your points. The resolution of these little MBAs is remarkable. You get a lot more screen real estate than you'd expect.
 
agree 11" MBA is fine

I agree, MBA is powerful enough to run any program that I need for work or home. only limitation on 11" screen would be physical limit of sorting photos, movies. I have 22" iMAC at home.

the best size comparison for MBA is IPAD; weight (with BT keyboard for IPAD) and screen size are comparable but MBA has MUCH more functionality.
 
I got the ultimate 13" MBA but have found myself wishing from time to time that I had gotten the 11" model. I just couldn't settle for 128GB max SSD, but I would really love the smaller form factor.
 
The menu bar and dock both take up a considerable amount of space at the top and the bottom. Even if the dock is hidden a lot of people do not use that extra space up. Combine that with the huge menu bars on some of the web browsers, i think chrome is still the only browser with semi-small top bar, and there ends up being a lot of excess space on the sides and not enough vertical space. Lots of 11.6" are putting the dock on the side though. Also with 11.6" inch you usually won't use two windows side-by-side, which is a great way to use a larger 16:9 monitor, especially students.

I really don't care 16:10 or 16:9. For a notebook i'd actually go with 16:9 most of the time if the footprint aspect ratio changes with the screen aspect ratio.

It took a bit of getting used to but i prefer the 16:9 aspect ratio now and all i ended up doing was moving my auto hide dock from the bottom and placing an always present doc on the left side. Its great and more real estate than my 13"uMB. Also my eyesight is not the greatest so i was a bit worried about the higher pixel density but this has been a really great screen for me and I've had no issues with it.
 
For me, I'm pretty much a battery life person. I kind of went for the 13" based on my doubts that the 11" battery life would do it for me. The size of the 11" is pretty much perfect, though.

However, I do have to admit, the 15" resolution of the 13" MBA is a sight to behold. It's incredibly good and I've put it to practical use in ways my 13" MBP couldn't do. Being able to run the typical 13" resolution app, full size in a window, have the dock in the bottom, and have room to work around it, is great. Especially for a small 13" flat piece of hardware that is still about the size of a small stack of papers.
 
I switched my 13 MBP for an 11,6 MBA and never missed the MBP. Indeed the screen resolution is better, however i do agree with some other posters that the 16:9 or 10 is not really ideal for someone typing a lot of very long documents on the go, however it seems to be a way to support the full size keyboard on a pretty small machine. The dock is hidden on the right side for me and made smaller, my office has all toolbars on the left side and therefore the maximized screen real estate is quite nice, apart from being able to run windows side by side of course.

If they could do the small MBA with the same size keyboard and 4:3 screen that would be great, however at the moment widescreen seems to be important to many, even though it is mainly aimed at video viewing and probably editing.

Best mobile screen in my arsenal so far is by far the vaio z 11 full hd one. But that is still a 13 inch notebook and of course it runs windows or linux, not MacOS. However if i need high performance on the go it is the notebook to use.
 
I got the ultimate 13" MBA but have found myself wishing from time to time that I had gotten the 11" model. I just couldn't settle for 128GB max SSD, but I would really love the smaller form factor.
I did exactly the same thing. Although, I was blown away by the 11 inch MBA when it was announced I got the 13 inch Ultimate model instead because I needed its 256GB of storage. I must say that the 13 inch Ultimate has succeeded beyond my wildest dreams. I still admire the 11 inch model, though, and think that the $999 entry level model could be an iPad on steroids.
 
I am (a) a 20 years Mac user who hides the dock at the bottom and uses that extra space and (b) a student who uses two windows side by side on the MBA 11.6" (LaTeX).

flatfoot- are you able to display a full page of the PDF output of LaTeX on the 11.6 and still read it? If so, what font size are you using in LaTeX?
 
Who is "a lot of people", and "most Mac users" and "a lot of 11.6"" for that matter? If you're a student, you should know that such vague arguments don't contribute to making a point. Do you actually have a MBA 11.6"?
I am (a) a 20 years Mac user who hides the dock at the bottom and uses that extra space and (b) a student who uses two windows side by side on the MBA 11.6" (LaTeX).

Stop being so defensive and childish. There are better ways to express your opinion or be heard. There was nothing wrong with what I said; it was not some logical flaw. The arguments were not "vague". I did not forget to put 'in my opinion' 'from my experiences' 'from what i have seen' or list out every experience I have had with some one using OSX or a computer. Some sentences are obviously opinion based on experience and observations. Did you really need an explanation of my post? Did I really need to tell you that these were observations? My post was not offensive nor did I attack any one. You can clearly see which users on the forums are adults and which are children by how they post. Saying that most people like vertical space or used up a lot of vertical space had three people write immature posts. You can disagree, you can explain, but the three posts in this thread were inappropriate.

You may use side-by-side on an 11.6" screen. But for lots of people there is not enough resolution nor enough size to make that comfortable. Even on an external monitor it is uncomfortable for some(no I cannot tell you which people specifically or give you data). From my experience, in my opinion, from what I have seen when people use computers, most people would not be able to use side-by-side well on an 11.6" screen despite the above average resolution. There are times when you do not need a lot of information and the resolution is enough to hold it, but most of the time you will have to scroll a lot and that may not be the best option. You will see people switching which window is on top.

What reason can you give for having the dock on the side of an MBA 11.6"? (Please do not ask for data showing this.)





...
Most mac users... hmmm.
Hmm.... Can you show me a data that proves this?
I do not have data on how people use their space on OSX. I can only guess that your somewhat useless post was to say you disagreed with me. What aspect ratio would you have if you had to choose? Would you choose a 2.35:1 11.6" screen? 16:10 or 16:9? Personally given the footprints I would choose 16:9, and that is why apple choose to use 16:9 on the 11.6" instead of the 16:10 on their other macbooks. If they felt 16:9 was superior they would have pushed it into some of their other models.


Go look at how most people use their OSX and macbooks specifically or take a better look at how you use your operating systems. Liking vertical space is not a bad thing, using vertical space is not a bad thing. Most macbooks are 16:10, in fact all of them except for the 11.6" air.

PC has been shifting more towards 16:9 for a long time now for various reasons. There have been lots of people complaining about this. They argue that they need vertical space for documents, code and webpages. Personally its not that big of a change. The majority of changes to 16:9 were because it was cheaper.
 
Last edited:
If they could do the small MBA with the same size keyboard and 4:3 screen that would be great, however at the moment widescreen seems to be important to many, even though it is mainly aimed at video viewing and probably editing.

I rarely watch or edit video. The widescreen for me is closer to my two monitor set up on my macpro. For Photoshop or indesign I can have my document on the left and all my palates to the right. They would normally be on my second screen on the right so they feel like they are in the same place.

That's my working style, active window or document on the left; reference, palates, background tasks on the right. The widescreen let's me do that

Tom
 
flatfoot- are you able to display a full page of the PDF output of LaTeX on the 11.6 and still read it? If so, what font size are you using in LaTeX?

I usually use 12pt Garamond. OK, I don't display the full PDF-page but zoom in so the actual text width fits the width of the window. That makes the text readable.
 
After using a MBP 17 for about a year now, I don't think I can ever go back to using a 720p screen. Completely unusable for me.

Now only if they made 1200p or 1080p screens in a 14 or 15 inch config. But I think this is highly unlikely.

With regards to screen dpi, the MBA 11 and MBA 13 are now up to par with the MBP 17 and the MBP 15 Hi-res.

The only ones with the lower dpi are the MB and the MBP 13. I have a feeling they will get resolution bumps pretty soon.
 
After using a MBP 17 for about a year now, I don't think I can ever go back to using a 720p screen. Completely unusable for me.

Yeah my first mac was an MBP 13, and my work Mac is an MBA 11. I can't wait to refresh to an MBP 17 for my personal machine but that won't be for a few years.

I often use both attached to a higher res display.
 
I whole hearted agree with the original poster. In the past 3 years I've gone from regular rev b MBA, MacBook pro 13, and regular mb 13, and now the 11.6, and the MBA 11.6 feels totally the same as the 13 in terms of real estate. Just lighter and portable of course!
 
My experience was completely different. Hated my 11 inch, small, hard to seem hard to read. Was one of the few apple products I wasn't sorry to see go.

13 inch should be here soon. That's a machine. The 11 is a fashion statement. Like a little toy dog in some lady's purse.
 
I think the screen on the 11" is perfect, it's not a toy, it's a very portable piece of equipment and great for emailing, web surfing, etc on the go. I didn't buy mine as a 1st computer, it's probably my 3rd, although I don't really see it like that, it's got a purpose, and for that specific purpose it's number one, my office pro and 2x 30" screens couldn't be used on the train for instance!!

I actually replaced a 10" Samsung netbook with my MBA and it's a massive improvement in screen quality and res, but then it did cost £500 more so it should be!
 
The menu bar and dock both take up a considerable amount of space at the top and the bottom. Even if the dock is hidden a lot of people do not use that extra space up. Combine that with the huge menu bars on some of the web browsers, i think chrome is still the only browser with semi-small top bar, and there ends up being a lot of excess space on the sides and not enough vertical space. Lots of 11.6" are putting the dock on the side though. Also with 11.6" inch you usually won't use two windows side-by-side, which is a great way to use a larger 16:9 monitor, especially students.

I really don't care 16:10 or 16:9. For a notebook i'd actually go with 16:9 most of the time if the footprint aspect ratio changes with the screen aspect ratio.

Ever since I upgraded from my Pismo to a new macbook pro last year, I've moved my dock to the side. Since the ratio of width to height increased, it seemed like a good solution. On a very large screen (cinema display) though, I still like having the dock on the bottom.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.