okay so I decided to skip the 15 and 17 inch MBP's and decided to pick either the MBA or MBP 13.
For those saying that MBAs are stupid/waste hear me out, this is my reasoning on why I am troubled between these 2.
The only reason why I would not buy a MBA is for its 2.13 core 2 duo processor. While the Macbook pro indeed has some beast processing power, I ask myself: Will I actually use this? So in order to make the comparison a little more fair, I decided to pick the low end mbp. the 2.3 i5.
The MBA:
-1440 x 900
-Slim, beautiful.
-Nvidia 320m
-256 SSD
-2.13 core2duo
-4GB RAM (same thing in MBP. I doubt i will see myself using more than 4GB RAM. I had my PC over 4 years and I am barely using 1.5)
-$1729 (Edu disc)
The MBP:
-1280 x 800
- Heavier than MBA (twice the weight)
- Intel 3000HD
- 256 SSD
- 2.3 i5
- 4 GB RAM
- $1684 (Edu disc)
So, the MBP ends up being almost the same price as the MBA. If I were using the high end MBP ($1939) I would rather go for a 15 MBP.
So my question is: Is sandybridge really worth it? I mean, I skipped out the 2010 MBA just for sandy bridge, but now that I see the power of SSDs there really is no point on using a beast processor when your HHD is doing 5400/7200 RPM.
Also, 1440 x 900 is just amazing compared to a 1280 x 800. plus weighing less does add to the satisfaction equation.
I rather use a 2.13 core2duo and 256SSD. But then again, I feel like im missing out on thunderbolt/raw power/usb ports (not so much)
Am I crazy if I were to pick an MBA over the MBP? Or should I just get the 13 and save 40 dollars.
or should i just wait for the new MBA (only if it launches before august and uses sandybridge).
Btw, for people that will ask me on what do I do in my computer is the following:
Youtube, itunes, LOTS of internet browsing, macrumors, facebook, starcraft II. (Again, if it werent starcraft II, I would most probably go for the MBA, but I heard the MBA isnt that bad in gaming.)
Help 😛
For those saying that MBAs are stupid/waste hear me out, this is my reasoning on why I am troubled between these 2.
The only reason why I would not buy a MBA is for its 2.13 core 2 duo processor. While the Macbook pro indeed has some beast processing power, I ask myself: Will I actually use this? So in order to make the comparison a little more fair, I decided to pick the low end mbp. the 2.3 i5.
The MBA:
-1440 x 900
-Slim, beautiful.
-Nvidia 320m
-256 SSD
-2.13 core2duo
-4GB RAM (same thing in MBP. I doubt i will see myself using more than 4GB RAM. I had my PC over 4 years and I am barely using 1.5)
-$1729 (Edu disc)
The MBP:
-1280 x 800
- Heavier than MBA (twice the weight)
- Intel 3000HD
- 256 SSD
- 2.3 i5
- 4 GB RAM
- $1684 (Edu disc)
So, the MBP ends up being almost the same price as the MBA. If I were using the high end MBP ($1939) I would rather go for a 15 MBP.
So my question is: Is sandybridge really worth it? I mean, I skipped out the 2010 MBA just for sandy bridge, but now that I see the power of SSDs there really is no point on using a beast processor when your HHD is doing 5400/7200 RPM.
Also, 1440 x 900 is just amazing compared to a 1280 x 800. plus weighing less does add to the satisfaction equation.
I rather use a 2.13 core2duo and 256SSD. But then again, I feel like im missing out on thunderbolt/raw power/usb ports (not so much)
Am I crazy if I were to pick an MBA over the MBP? Or should I just get the 13 and save 40 dollars.
or should i just wait for the new MBA (only if it launches before august and uses sandybridge).
Btw, for people that will ask me on what do I do in my computer is the following:
Youtube, itunes, LOTS of internet browsing, macrumors, facebook, starcraft II. (Again, if it werent starcraft II, I would most probably go for the MBA, but I heard the MBA isnt that bad in gaming.)
Help 😛